50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The efficacy of app‐supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 4
      World Psychiatry
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although impressive progress has been made toward developing empirically-supported psychological treatments, the reality remains that a significant proportion of people with mental health problems do not receive these treatments. Finding ways to reduce this treatment gap is crucial. Since app-supported smartphone interventions are touted as a possible solution, access to up-to-date guidance around the evidence base and clinical utility of these interventions is needed. We conducted a meta-analysis of 66 randomized controlled trials of app-supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems. Smartphone interventions significantly outperformed control conditions in improving depressive (g=0.28, n=54) and generalized anxiety (g=0.30, n=39) symptoms, stress levels (g=0.35, n=27), quality of life (g=0.35, n=43), general psychiatric distress (g=0.40, n=12), social anxiety symptoms (g=0.58, n=6), and positive affect (g=0.44, n=6), with most effects being robust even after adjusting for various possible biasing factors (type of control condition, risk of bias rating). Smartphone interventions conferred no significant benefit over control conditions on panic symptoms (g=-0.05, n=3), post-traumatic stress symptoms (g=0.18, n=4), and negative affect (g=-0.08, n=5). Studies that delivered a cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)-based app and offered professional guidance and reminders to engage produced larger effects on multiple outcomes. Smartphone interventions did not differ significantly from active interventions (face-to-face, computerized treatment), although the number of studies was low (n≤13). The efficacy of app-supported smartphone interventions for common mental health problems was thus confirmed. Although mental health apps are not intended to replace professional clinical services, the present findings highlight the potential of apps to serve as a cost-effective, easily accessible, and low intensity intervention for those who cannot receive standard psychological treatment.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          World Psychiatry
          World Psychiatry
          Wiley
          1723-8617
          2051-5545
          September 09 2019
          October 2019
          September 09 2019
          October 2019
          : 18
          : 3
          : 325-336
          Affiliations
          [1 ]School of PsychologyDeakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
          [2 ]Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
          [3 ]Department of PsychologyStockholm University Stockholm Sweden
          [4 ]Center for Social and Early Emotional DevelopmentDeakin University Burwood Victoria Australia
          Article
          10.1002/wps.20673
          6732686
          31496095
          f0b2413a-1e61-4d77-93c1-06c214ecffbf
          © 2019

          http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article