2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anti-science case study: COVID-19 vaccines’ effectiveness and safety exaggerated

      letter
      Public Health in Practice
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults

          Introduction In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We adapted the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in mRNA COVID-19 vaccine trials. Methods Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adults (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on Brighton Collaboration adverse events of special interest. Results Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95 % CI −0.4 to 20.6 and −3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 2.1 to 22.9); risk ratio 1.43 (95 % CI 1.07 to 1.92). The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group; risk difference 18.0 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group: risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI –23.2 to 37.4); risk ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33). Combined, there was a 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients: risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI −3.2 to 29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39). Discussion The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Sources of bias in observational studies of covid‐19 vaccine effectiveness

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Public Health Pract (Oxf)
                Public Health Pract (Oxf)
                Public Health in Practice
                Elsevier
                2666-5352
                23 May 2024
                June 2024
                23 May 2024
                : 7
                : 100517
                Affiliations
                [1]University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                Article
                S2666-5352(24)00054-5 100517
                10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100517
                11153924
                38846110
                f069f1eb-f43b-47a2-9afa-023cfb5145e3
                © 2024 The Author

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 13 April 2024
                : 19 April 2024
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Comments

                Comment on this article