25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dietary intake and biomarkers of alpha linolenic acid and risk of all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To examine the associations between dietary intake and tissue biomarkers of alpha linolenic acid (ALA) and risk of mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer.

          Design

          Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

          Data sources

          PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar to 30 April 2021.

          Study selection

          Prospective cohort studies that reported the risk estimates for death from all causes, CVD, and cancer.

          Data synthesis

          Summary relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the highest versus lowest categories of ALA intake using random effects and fixed effects models. Linear and non-linear dose-response analyses were conducted to assess the dose-response associations between ALA intake and mortality.

          Results

          41 articles from prospective cohort studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, totalling 1 197 564 participants. During follow-up ranging from two to 32 years, 198 113 deaths from all causes, 62 773 from CVD, and 65 954 from cancer were recorded. High intake of ALA compared with low intake was significantly associated with a lower risk of deaths from all causes (pooled relative risk 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.97, I 2=77.8%, 15 studies), CVD (0.92, 0.86 to 0.99, I 2=48.2%, n=16), and coronary heart disease (CHD) (0.89, 0.81 to 0.97, I 2=5.6%, n=9), and a slightly higher risk of cancer mortality (1.06, 1.02 to 1.11, I 2=3.8%, n=10). In the dose-response analysis, a 1 g/day increase in ALA intake (equivalent to one tablespoon of canola oil or 0.5 ounces of walnut) was associated with a 5% lower risk of all cause (0.95, 0.91 to 0.99, I 2=76.2%, n=12) and CVD mortality (0.95, 0.91 to 0.98, I 2=30.7%, n=14). The pooled relative risks for the highest compared with lowest tissue levels of ALA indicated a significant inverse association with all cause mortality (0.95, 0.90 to 0.99, I 2=8.2%, n=26). Also, based on the dose-response analysis, each 1 standard deviation increment in blood concentrations of ALA was associated with a lower risk of CHD mortality (0.92, 0.86 to 0.98, I 2=37.1%, n=14).

          Conclusions

          The findings show that dietary ALA intake is associated with a reduced risk of mortality from all causes, CVD, and CHD, and a slightly higher risk of cancer mortality, whereas higher blood levels of ALA are associated with a reduced risk of all cause and CHD mortality only.

          Systematic review registration

          PROSPERO CRD42021229487.

          Related collections

          Most cited references102

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

            Estimates of the worldwide incidence and mortality from 27 major cancers and for all cancers combined for 2012 are now available in the GLOBOCAN series of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. We review the sources and methods used in compiling the national cancer incidence and mortality estimates, and briefly describe the key results by cancer site and in 20 large "areas" of the world. Overall, there were 14.1 million new cases and 8.2 million deaths in 2012. The most commonly diagnosed cancers were lung (1.82 million), breast (1.67 million), and colorectal (1.36 million); the most common causes of cancer death were lung cancer (1.6 million deaths), liver cancer (745,000 deaths), and stomach cancer (723,000 deaths). © 2014 UICC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: masters student
                Role: associate professor
                Role: professor of biostatistics
                Role: assistant professor of infectious disease
                Role: masters of operation room
                Role: professor of nutrition
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                BMJ-UK
                bmj
                The BMJ
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2021
                14 October 2021
                : 375
                : n2213
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Students’ Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [2 ]Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [3 ]Department of Nutrition, Bjørknes University College, Oslo, Norway
                [4 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [5 ]Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
                [6 ]Unit of Cardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [7 ]Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
                [8 ]Chanchlani Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
                [9 ]Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran
                [10 ]Department of Operating Room Nursing, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran
                [11 ]Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                [12 ]Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: O Sadeghi omidsadeghi69@ 123456yahoo.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1029-1652
                Article
                nags065034
                10.1136/bmj.n2213
                8513503
                34645650
                f0698163-7a00-4961-9011-36ce86c6ef3d
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 07 September 2021
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article