10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and Recurrence-Free Survival Among Patients With Stage III Melanoma Randomized to Receive Pembrolizumab or Placebo : A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

      research-article
      , MD, PhD 1 , , PhD 2 , , MD, PhD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD, PhD 5 , , MD 6 , , MD 7 , , MD 8 , , MD 9 , , MD, PhD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD, PhD 13 , , MD 14 , , MD, PhD 15 , , MD, PhD 16 , 17 , , MD 18 , , MD 19 , , MD 20 , , MD 21 , , MD 22 , , MD 23 , , MD 24 , , MD 25 , , MD 26 , , MD 26 , , MD 2 , , MD, PhD 3 , , MD, PhD 1 , , PhD 2 ,
      JAMA Oncology
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial examines the association between immune-related adverse events and recurrence-free survival among patients with high-risk stage III melanoma who were treated with pembrozimulab therapy or placebo in the EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 study.

          Key Points

          Question

          Are immune-related adverse events associated with recurrence-free survival in patients with high-risk stage III melanoma treated with pembrolizumab therapy compared with placebo?

          Findings

          In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of 1019 adults with stage III melanoma, the occurrence of an immune-related adverse event was associated with longer recurrence-free survival among both men and women in the pembrolizumab arm. However, in the placebo arm, this association was not significant.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that the occurrence of an immune-related adverse event is an indicator of pembrolizumab activity in patients with high-risk stage III melanoma.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Whether immune-related adverse events (irAEs) indicate drug activity in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors remains unknown.

          Objective

          To investigate the association between irAEs and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the double-blind EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 clinical trial comparing pembrolizumab therapy and placebo for the treatment of patients with high-risk stage III melanoma.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          A total of 1019 adults with stage III melanoma were randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to receive treatment with pembrolizumab therapy or placebo. Eligible patients were adults 18 years and older with complete resection of cutaneous melanoma metastatic to lymph nodes, classified with stage IIIA (at least 1 micrometastasis measuring >1 mm in greatest diameter), IIIB, or IIIC (without in-transit metastasis) cancer. Patients were randomized from August 26, 2015, to November 14, 2016. The clinical cutoff for the data set was October 2, 2017. Analyses were then performed on the database, which was locked on November 28, 2017.

          Interventions

          Participants were scheduled to receive 200 mg of pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses for approximately 1 year or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxic effects, major protocol violation, or withdrawal of consent.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The association between irAEs and RFS was estimated using a Cox model adjusted for sex, age, and AJCC-7 stage, with a time-varying covariate that had a value of 0 before irAE onset and 1 after irAE onset.

          Results

          Of 1011 patients who began treatment with pembrolizumab therapy or placebo, 622 (61.5%) were men and 389 (38.5%) were women; 386 patients (38.2%) were aged 50 to 64 years, 377 (37.3%) were younger than 50 years, and 248 (24.5%) were 65 years and older. Consistent with the reported main analysis in the intent-to-treat population, RFS was longer in the pembrolizumab arm compared with the placebo arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 98.4% CI, 0.43-0.74) among patients who started treatment. The incidence of irAEs was 190 (37.4%) in the pembrolizumab arm (n = 509) and 45 (9.0%) in the placebo arm (n = 502); in each treatment group, the incidence was similar for men and women. The occurrence of an irAE was associated with a longer RFS in the pembrolizumab arm (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.95; P = .03) in both men and women. However, in the placebo arm, this association was not significant. Compared with the placebo arm, the reduction in the hazard of recurrence or death in the pembrolizumab arm was greater after the onset of an irAE than without or before an irAE (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24-0.57 vs HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49-0.77, respectively; P = .03).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this study, the occurrence of an irAE was associated with a longer RFS in the pembrolizumab arm.

          Trial Registrations

          ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02362594; EudraCT identifier: 2014-004944-37

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

          (2013)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma

            Nivolumab and ipilimumab are immune checkpoint inhibitors that have been approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma. In the United States, ipilimumab has also been approved as adjuvant therapy for melanoma on the basis of recurrence-free and overall survival rates that were higher than those with placebo in a phase 3 trial. We wanted to determine the efficacy of nivolumab versus ipilimumab for adjuvant therapy in patients with resected advanced melanoma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Placebo in Resected Stage III Melanoma

              The programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab has been found to prolong progression-free and overall survival among patients with advanced melanoma. We conducted a phase 3 double-blind trial to evaluate pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected, high-risk stage III melanoma.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncology
                American Medical Association
                2374-2437
                2374-2445
                April 2020
                2 January 2020
                2 January 2020
                : 6
                : 4
                : 519-527
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Universite Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
                [2 ]European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
                [3 ]Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [4 ]Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
                [5 ]Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney and Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [6 ]Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [7 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon Cancer Institute, Lyon University, Lyon, France
                [8 ]Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [9 ]Fiona Stanley Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Washington, Australia
                [10 ]Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute Australia and the University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [11 ]Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [12 ]Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
                [13 ]Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [14 ]Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
                [15 ]Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
                [16 ]University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
                [17 ]Germany and German Cancer Consortium of Translational Cancer Research, Heidelberg, Germany
                [18 ]Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [19 ]Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
                [20 ]Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
                [21 ]Vrije Universiteit Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [22 ]Hopital de la Timone, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
                [23 ]Skin Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
                [24 ]Centre de Recherche, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [25 ]Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
                [26 ]Merck & Co, Kenilworth, New Jersey
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: October 15, 2019.
                Published Online: January 2, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5570
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. © 2020 Eggermont AMM et al. JAMA Oncology.
                Corresponding Author: Stefan Suciu, PhD, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Avenue Mounier 83/11, 1200 Brussels, Belgium ( stefan.suciu@ 123456eortc.org ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Robert and Suciu had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Eggermont, Kicinski, Long, Khattak, Lorigan, Marreaud, Robert, Suciu.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Eggermont, Kicinski, Mandala, Khattak, Larkin, Hernandez-Aya, van Akkooi, Suciu.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Eggermont, Kicinski.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Blank, Mandala, Carlino, Sandhu, Larkin, Rutkowski, Schadendorf, Koornstra, van den Eertwegh, Krepler, van Akkooi.
                Supervision: Eggermont, Mandala, Atkinson, Haydon, Ascierto, Rutkowski, Koornstra, Lorigan, Ibrahim, Marreaud, van Akkooi, Suciu.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Eggermont reported being the study chair of the EORTC 18071 phase 3 clinical trial of ipilimumab therapy vs placebo in patients with stage III melanoma and receiving personal fees from Actelion, Agenus, Amgen, Bayer, BioInvent, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CatalYm, Celldex, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, HalioDx, Incyte, IO Biotech, ISA Pharmaceuticals, MedImmune, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Polynoma, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, and SkylineDx and owning equity in SkylineDx outside the submitted work. Dr Kicinski reported receiving grants from Merck during the conduct of the study. Dr Blank reported receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, NanoString Technologies, and Novartis and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GenMab, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, NanoString Technologies, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Roche during the conduct of the study. Dr Mandala reported receiving grants from Genentech/Roche and Novartis and serving as an advisor for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre outside the submitted work. Dr Long reported receiving personal fees from Aduro, Amgen, Array BioPharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, OncoSec, Pierre Fabre, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Atkinson reported receiving personal fees, speaking fees, and/or travel support from and/or serving on the advisory board of Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, OncoSec, Pierre Fabre, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Dalle reported receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck Sharpe & Dohme outside the submitted work. Dr Haydon reported receiving personal fees from Merck outside the submitted work. Dr Carlino reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, IDEAYA Biosciences, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Sandhu reported receiving grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Endocyte, and Merck Sharp & Dohme outside the submitted work. Dr Larkin reported receiving grants from Achilles Therapeutics, AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Covance, Genentech/Roche, Immunocore, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Nektar, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, and Pfizer and personal fees from Achilles Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boston Biomedical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Covance, Eisai, EUSA Pharma, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunocore, Imugene, Incyte, iOnctura, Ipsen, Kymab, Merck Serono, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Secarna Pharmaceuticals, and Vitaccess during the conduct of the study. Dr Puig reported receiving patient fees for Merck Sharpe & Dohme during the conduct of the study and receiving grants from Almirall, Castle Biosciences, Leo Pharma, MelaGenix, and Novartis, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Almirall, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ISDIN, La Roche-Posay, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Sanofi, and patient fees for Biofrontera, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Philogen, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. Dr Ascierto reported receiving grants and research funds from Array BioPharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Genentech/Roche and receiving personal fees for serving as an advisor for 4SC, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche Genmab, Idera Pharmaceutials, Immunocore, Incyte, MedImmune, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, NewLink Genetics, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sandoz, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, and Ultimovacs outside the submitted work. Dr Rutkowski reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Schadendorf reported receiving personal fees and nonfinancial support from Merck Sharp & Dohme during the conduct of the study and receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and personal fees and nonfinancial support from 4SC, Array BioPharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Immunocore, InflaRx, NeraCare, Novartis, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Sandoz-Hexal, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, and Ultimovacs outside the submitted work. Dr Koornstra reported receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Roche and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre outside the submitted work. Dr Hernandez-Aya reported receiving grants from Merck during the conduct of the study and receiving grants from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Immunocore, MedImmune, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Polynoma, Roche, and Takeda, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and speaking fees and travel support from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi outside the submitted work. Dr Di Giacomo reported receiving personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme during the conduct of the study and receiving personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, and Pierre Fabre outside the submitted work. Dr van den Eertwegh reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Grob reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Gutzmer reported receiving grants from Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer and personal fees and nonfinancial support from 4SC, Almirall, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck Serono, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, and Takeda outside the submitted work. Dr Jamal reported receiving grants and patient fees from Merck Sharpe & Dohme during the conduct of the study and receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, patient fees for Array BioPharma, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, MedImmune, Merck Canada, Novartis Canada, Pfizer, and Genentech/Quintiles/Roche, and serving as an advisor for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr Lorigan reported receiving patient fees for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer during the conduct of the study and receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and personal fees, speaking fees, and/or travel support from or serving as an advisor for Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck, NeraCare, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre outside the submitted work. Dr Ibrahim reported owning financial shares in GlaxoSmithKline and Merck outside the submitted work. Dr van Akkooi reported receiving grants from 4SC, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr Robert reported receiving personal fees from Merck Sharpe & Dohme during the conduct of the study and receiving personal fees from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. Dr Suciu reported receiving grants from Merck during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by Merck & Co.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: Merck & Co. participated in and supported the design and conduct of the study and the collection of the data. Merck & Co. also reviewed and approved the manuscript but had no role in the analysis and interpretation of the data or in the preparation of the manuscript. The decision to submit the manuscript for publication was made by the authors.
                Meeting Presentation: The results were presented in part at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 1, 2019; Chicago, Illinois.
                Additional Contributions: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters 1325 study team members provided assistance with data and project management, statistical analysis, pharmacovigilance, and medical knowledge. The Merck Sharpe & Dohme KEYNOTE-054 study team members provided study oversight, protocol conception, and study design. In addition, Mikhail Lichinitser, MD (deceased), of the Russian Oncology Scientific Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation, made important contributions. We thank all of the additional investigators who participated in this clinical trial; a full list is provided in eTable 7 in Supplement 2.
                Article
                coi190101
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5570
                6990933
                31895407
                f0387fcb-dde2-425b-860e-d72f121ee65b
                Copyright 2020 Eggermont AMM et al. JAMA Oncology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.

                History
                : 26 July 2019
                : 5 October 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Selected for Univadis Oncology
                Online First
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article