8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) has been implicated in several auditory processes. The putative role of the MOCR in improving speech perception in noise is particularly relevant for children who complain of listening difficulties (LiD). The hypothesis that the MOCR may be impaired in individuals with LiD or auditory processing disorder has led to several investigations but without consensus. In two related studies, we compared the MOCR functioning of children with LiD and typically developing (TD) children in the same age range (7–17 years). In Study 1, we investigated ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral MOCR using forward-masked click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs; n = 17 TD, 17 LiD). In Study 2, we employed three OAE types: CEOAEs ( n = 16 TD, 21 LiD), stimulus frequency OAEs ( n = 21 TD, 30 LiD), and distortion product OAEs ( n = 17 TD, 22 LiD) in a contralateral noise paradigm. Results from both studies suggest that the MOCR functioning is not significantly different between the two groups. Some likely reasons for differences in findings among published studies could stem from the lack of strict data quality measures (e.g., high signal-to-noise ratio, control for the middle ear muscle reflex) that were enforced in the present study. The inherent variability of the MOCR, the subpar reliability of current MOCR methods, and the heterogeneity in auditory processing deficits that underlie auditory processing disorder make detecting clinically relevant differences in MOCR function impractical using current methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans.

            This review covers the basic anatomy and physiology of the olivocochlear reflexes and the use of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) in humans to monitor the effects of one group, the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents. MOC fibers synapse on outer hair cells (OHCs), and activation of these fibers inhibits basilar membrane responses to low-level sounds. This MOC-induced decrease in the gain of the cochlear amplifier is reflected in changes in OAEs. Any OAE can be used to monitor MOC effects on the cochlear amplifier. Each OAE type has its own advantages and disadvantages. The most straightforward technique for monitoring MOC effects is to elicit MOC activity with an elicitor sound contralateral to the OAE test ear. MOC effects can also be monitored using an ipsilateral elicitor of MOC activity, but the ipsilateral elicitor brings additional problems caused by suppression and cochlear slow intrinsic effects. To measure MOC effects accurately, one must ensure that there are no middle-ear-muscle contractions. Although standard clinical middle-ear-muscle tests are not adequate for this, adequate tests can usually be done with OAE-measuring instruments. An additional complication is that most probe sounds also elicit MOC activity, although this does not prevent the probe from showing MOC effects elicited by contralateral sound. A variety of data indicate that MOC efferents help to reduce acoustic trauma and lessen the masking of transients by background noise; for instance, they aid in speech comprehension in noise. However, much remains to be learned about the role of efferents in auditory function. Monitoring MOC effects in humans using OAEs should continue to provide valuable insights into the role of MOC efferents and may also provide clinical benefits.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis.

              A growing body of research suggests that musical training has a beneficial impact on speech processing (e.g., hearing of speech in noise and prosody perception). As this research moves forward two key questions need to be addressed: 1) Can purely instrumental musical training have such effects? 2) If so, how and why would such effects occur? The current paper offers a conceptual framework for understanding such effects based on mechanisms of neural plasticity. The expanded OPERA hypothesis proposes that when music and speech share sensory or cognitive processing mechanisms in the brain, and music places higher demands on these mechanisms than speech does, this sets the stage for musical training to enhance speech processing. When these higher demands are combined with the emotional rewards of music, the frequent repetition that musical training engenders, and the focused attention that it requires, neural plasticity is activated and makes lasting changes in brain structure and function which impact speech processing. Initial data from a new study motivated by the OPERA hypothesis is presented, focusing on the impact of musical training on speech perception in cochlear-implant users. Suggestions for the development of animal models to test OPERA are also presented, to help motivate neurophysiological studies of how auditory training using non-biological sounds can impact the brain's perceptual processing of species-specific vocalizations. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled . Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Trends Hear
                Trends Hear
                TIA
                sptia
                Trends in Hearing
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2331-2165
                26 September 2019
                Jan-Dec 2019
                : 23
                : 2331216519870942
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
                [2 ]Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
                [3 ]School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western University, London, ON, Canada
                [4 ]National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
                Author notes
                [*]Sriram Boothalingam, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Waisman Center, Rm 539, 1500 Highland Avenue, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA. Email: boothalingam@ 123456wisc.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3901-3071
                Article
                10.1177_2331216519870942
                10.1177/2331216519870942
                6767729
                31558110
                efea8670-c0b8-4d40-8a76-ea819d9c23a9
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 9 April 2019
                : 10 July 2019
                : 26 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Western Graduate Research Scholarship , FundRef ;
                Funded by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, FundRef https://doi.org10.13039/501100000038;
                Award ID: 05320-2007
                Funded by: Canada Foundation for Innovation, FundRef https://doi.org10.13039/501100000196;
                Award ID: 11419
                Funded by: Ontario Research Fund, FundRef ;
                Award ID: LEF#RE-03009
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2019

                auditory processing disorder,listening difficulty,medial olivocochlear reflex,otoacoustic emissions

                Comments

                Comment on this article