Improving Decision Making in Forensic Child Sexual Abuse Evaluations. – ScienceOpen
14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Improving Decision Making in Forensic Child Sexual Abuse Evaluations.

      Law and Human Behavior
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mental health professionals can assist legal decision makers in cases of allegations of child sexual abuse by collecting data using forensic interviews, psychological testing, and record reviews, and by summarizing relevant findings from social science research. Significant controversy surrounds another key task performed by mental health professionals in most child sexual abuse evaluations, i.e., deciding whether or not to substantiate unconfirmed abuse allegations. The available evidence indicates that, on the whole, these substantiation decisions currently lack adequate psychometric reliability and validity: an analysis of empirical research findings leads to the conclusion that at least 24% of all of these decisions are either false positive or false negative errors. Surprisingly, a reanalysis of existing research also indicates that it may be possible to develop reliable, objective procedures to improve the consistency and quality of decision making in this domain. A preliminary, empirically-grounded procedure for making substantiation decisions is proposed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis.

          The process of making judgments and decisions requires a method for combining data. To compare the accuracy of clinical and mechanical (formal, statistical) data-combination techniques, we performed a meta-analysis on studies of human health and behavior. On average, mechanical-prediction techniques were about 10% more accurate than clinical predictions. Depending on the specific analysis, mechanical prediction substantially outperformed clinical prediction in 33%-47% of studies examined. Although clinical predictions were often as accurate as mechanical predictions, in only a few studies (6%-16%) were they substantially more accurate. Superiority for mechanical-prediction techniques was consistent, regardless of the judgment task, type of judges, judges' amounts of experience, or the types of data being combined. Clinical predictions performed relatively less well when predictors included clinical interview data. These data indicate that mechanical predictions of human behaviors are equal or superior to clinical prediction methods for a wide range of circumstances.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence.

            Paul Meehl (1954)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children's testimony.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Law and Human Behavior
                Law and Human Behavior
                Springer Nature
                1573-661X
                0147-7307
                2005
                2005
                : 29
                : 1
                : 87-120
                Article
                10.1007/s10979-005-1400-8
                15865333
                ef8c38e7-7af8-4a2d-a398-360451a02524
                © 2005
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article