1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Constraining M ν with the bispectrum. Part II. The information content of the galaxy bispectrum monopole

      ,
      Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
      IOP Publishing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Massive neutrinos suppress the growth of structure on small scales and leave an imprint on large-scale structure that can be measured to constrain their total mass, M ν. With standard analyses of two-point clustering statistics, M ν constraints are severely limited by parameter degeneracies. Ref. [1] demonstrated that the bispectrum, the next higher-order statistic, can break these degeneracies and dramatically improve constraints on M ν and other cosmological parameters. In this paper, we present the constraining power of the redshift-space galaxy bispectrum monopole, B g 0. We construct the Molino suite of 75,000 mock galaxy catalogs from the Quijote N-body simulations using the halo occupation distribution (HOD) model, which provides a galaxy bias framework well-suited for simulation-based approaches. Using these mocks, we present Fisher matrix forecasts for {Ω m, Ω b, h, n s , σ 8, M ν} and quantify, for the first time, the information content of the B g 0 down to nonlinear scales. For k max = 0.5 h/Mpc, B g 0 improves constraints on Ω m, Ω b, h, n s , σ 8, and M ν by 2.8, 3.1, 3.8, 4.2, 4.2, and 4.6× over the power spectrum, after marginalizing over HOD parameters. Even with priors from Planck, B g 0 improves all of the cosmological constraints by ≳ 2×. In fact, for P g 0+ P g 2 and B g 0 out to k max = 0.5 h/Mpc with Planck priors, we achieve a 1σ M ν constraint of 0.048 eV, which is tighter than the current best cosmological constraint. While effects such as survey geometry and assembly bias will have an impact, these constraints are derived for (1 h -1 Gpc) 3, a substantially smaller volume than upcoming surveys. Therefore, we conclude that the galaxy bispectrum will significantly improve cosmological constraints for upcoming galaxy surveys — especially for M ν.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Neutrino oscillations refitted

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Neutrino Mass from Cosmology

              Neutrinos can play an important role in the evolution of the universe, modifying some of the cosmological observables. In this contribution we summarize the main aspects of cosmological relic neutrinos, and we describe how the precision of present cosmological data can be used to learn about neutrino properties, in particular their mass, providing complementary information to beta decay and neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments. We show how the analysis of current cosmological observations, such as the anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background or the distribution of large-scale structure, provides an upper bound on the sum of neutrino masses of order 1 eV or less, with very good perspectives from future cosmological measurements which are expected to be sensitive to neutrino masses well into the sub-eV range.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
                J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.
                IOP Publishing
                1475-7516
                April 12 2021
                April 01 2021
                April 12 2021
                April 01 2021
                : 2021
                : 04
                : 029
                Article
                10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/029
                eeefdaf7-1b14-491b-a1fd-e03500f512bb
                © 2021

                https://iopscience.iop.org/page/copyright

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article