6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interprofessional Consensus Regarding Design Requirements for Liquid-Based Perinatal Life Support (PLS) Technology

      brief-report
      1 , 2 , 3 , * , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 2 , 9 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 15 , 20 , 20 , 21 , 1 , 3 , 19 , 22 , 2 , 1 , 3
      Frontiers in Pediatrics
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      perinatal life support, artificial placenta, AAPT, user perspectives, design implications, value-sensitive design

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Liquid-based perinatal life support (PLS) technology will probably be applied in a first-in-human study within the next decade. Research and development of PLS technology should not only address technical issues, but also consider socio-ethical and legal aspects, its application area, and the corresponding design implications. This paper represents the consensus opinion of a group of healthcare professionals, designers, ethicists, researchers and patient representatives, who have expertise in tertiary obstetric and neonatal care, bio-ethics, experimental perinatal animal models for physiologic research, biomedical modeling, monitoring, and design. The aim of this paper is to provide a framework for research and development of PLS technology. These requirements are considering the possible respective user perspectives, with the aim to co-create a PLS system that facilitates physiological growth and development for extremely preterm born infants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Intraventricular hemorrhage and neurodevelopmental outcomes in extreme preterm infants.

          Not many large studies have reported the true impact of lower-grade intraventricular hemorrhages in preterm infants. We studied the neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants in relation to the severity of intraventricular hemorrhage. A regional cohort study of infants born at 23 to 28 weeks' gestation and admitted to a NICU between 1998 and 2004. Primary outcome measure was moderate to severe neurosensory impairment at 2 to 3 years' corrected age defined as developmental delay (developmental quotient >2 SD below the mean), cerebral palsy, bilateral deafness, or bilateral blindness. Of the 1472 survivors assessed, infants with grade III-IV intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH; n = 93) had higher rates of developmental delay (17.5%), cerebral palsy (30%), deafness (8.6%), and blindness (2.2%). Grade I-II IVH infants (n = 336) also had increased rates of neurosensory impairment (22% vs 12.1%), developmental delay (7.8% vs 3.4%), cerebral palsy (10.4% vs 6.5%), and deafness (6.0% vs 2.3%) compared with the no IVH group (n = 1043). After exclusion of 40 infants with late ultrasound findings (periventricular leukomalacia, porencephaly, ventricular enlargement), isolated grade I-II IVH (n = 296) had increased rates of moderate-severe neurosensory impairment (18.6% vs 12.1%). Isolated grade I-II IVH was also independently associated with a higher risk of neurosensory impairment (adjusted odds ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.22-2.46). Grade I-II IVH, even with no documented white matter injury or other late ultrasound abnormalities, is associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in extremely preterm infants.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            An extra-uterine system to physiologically support the extreme premature lamb

            In the developed world, extreme prematurity is the leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity due to a combination of organ immaturity and iatrogenic injury. Until now, efforts to extend gestation using extracorporeal systems have achieved limited success. Here we report the development of a system that incorporates a pumpless oxygenator circuit connected to the fetus of a lamb via an umbilical cord interface that is maintained within a closed ‘amniotic fluid' circuit that closely reproduces the environment of the womb. We show that fetal lambs that are developmentally equivalent to the extreme premature human infant can be physiologically supported in this extra-uterine device for up to 4 weeks. Lambs on support maintain stable haemodynamics, have normal blood gas and oxygenation parameters and maintain patency of the fetal circulation. With appropriate nutritional support, lambs on the system demonstrate normal somatic growth, lung maturation and brain growth and myelination.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fetal Physiology and the Transition to Extrauterine Life.

              The physiology of the fetus is fundamentally different from the neonate, with both structural and functional distinctions. The fetus is well-adapted to the relatively hypoxemic intrauterine environment. The transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life requires rapid, complex, and well-orchestrated steps to ensure neonatal survival. This article explains the intrauterine physiology that allows the fetus to survive and then reviews the physiologic changes that occur during the transition to extrauterine life. Asphyxia fundamentally alters the physiology of transition and necessitates a thoughtful approach in the management of affected neonates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pediatr
                Front Pediatr
                Front. Pediatr.
                Frontiers in Pediatrics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2360
                19 January 2022
                2021
                : 9
                : 793531
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Centre , Veldhoven, Netherlands
                [2] 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology , Eindhoven, Netherlands
                [3] 3Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology , Eindhoven, Netherlands
                [4] 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Fetal Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) , Leiden, Netherlands
                [5] 5Department of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Centre , Veldhoven, Netherlands
                [6] 6Department of Applied Physics, School of Medical Physics and Engineering Eindhoven, Eindhoven University of Technology , Eindhoven, Netherlands
                [7] 7Division of Neonatology, Department of Perinatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital , Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [8] 8Department of Neonatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital , Groningen, Netherlands
                [9] 9Department of Industrial Design Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology , Eindhoven, Netherlands
                [10] 10Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [11] 11Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen, Netherlands
                [12] 12Department of Neonatology, Utrecht University Medical Center , Utrecht, Netherlands
                [13] 13Department of Neonatology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC) , Maastricht, Netherlands
                [14] 14Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht University Medical Center , Utrecht, Netherlands
                [15] 15Institute for Applied Medical Engineering and Clinic for Neonatology, University Hospital Aachen , Aachen, Germany
                [16] 16Department of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [17] 17Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [18] 18Department of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) , Leiden, Netherlands
                [19] 19Department of Neonatology, Erasmus Medical Centre , Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [20] 20Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Medical Centre , Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [21] 21Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC) , Maastricht, Netherlands
                [22] 22Care4Neo Foundation , Rotterdam, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Claus Klingenberg, Arctic University of Norway, Norway

                Reviewed by: Janicke Syltern, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway; Elisabeth Olhager, Lund University, Sweden

                *Correspondence: M. Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt m.b.v.d.hout@ 123456tue.nl

                This article was submitted to Neonatology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

                †Membership of the PLS Consortium and Dutch Consortium are provided in the Acknowledgments

                Article
                10.3389/fped.2021.793531
                8809135
                35127593
                edfd920f-8e7b-4f6d-a0b1-5e6e956de2ff
                Copyright © 2022 van der Hout-van der Jagt, Verweij, Andriessen, de Boode, Bos, Delbressine, Eggink, Erwich, Feijs, Groenendaal, Kramer, Lely, Loop, Neukamp, Onland, Oudijk, te Pas, Reiss, Schoberer, Scholten, Spaanderman, van der Ven, Vermeulen, van de Vosse and Oei.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 October 2021
                : 14 December 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 45, Pages: 8, Words: 6347
                Funding
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, doi 10.13039/100010661;
                Categories
                Pediatrics
                Perspective

                perinatal life support,artificial placenta,aapt,user perspectives,design implications,value-sensitive design

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content161

                Cited by9

                Most referenced authors346