35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Repercussão da dor da cintura pélvica na funcionalidade de gestantes avaliadas através da versão brasileira do Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ-Brasil): estudo transversal Translated title: La repercusión del dolor pélvico en la funcionalidad de embarazadas evaluadas desde la versión brasileña del Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ-Brasil): estudio transversal Translated title: Repercussion of pelvic girdle pain on pregnant women's functionality evaluated through the Brazilian version of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ-Brazil): a cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMO Com o objetivo de analisar a repercussão da dor da cintura pélvica na funcionalidade de gestantes, foi realizado um estudo transversal envolvendo mulheres grávidas, com idade entre 18 e 30 anos e diagnóstico clínico de dor da cintura pélvica relacionada à gravidez (DCPG). Foram coletados dados clínicos, seguidos da aplicação do Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire versão brasileira (PGQ-Brasil). Participaram do estudo 105 gestantes, das quais 62,9% eram multíparas. O diagnóstico mais frequente foi o de síndrome sacroilíaca unilateral. Quanto ao aparecimento da dor, 45,7% relataram que a dor ocorria durante os movimentos e as atividades que apresentaram maior limitação eram ficar sentada, em pé e andar por mais de 60 minutos. A média da dor na Escala Visual Analógica (EVA) foi 6,59 (1,8 DP), considerada dor moderada. As gestantes com síndrome da cintura pélvica apresentaram uma média de 54,86 (22,39 DP) para o escore total do PGQ-Brasil, as com síndrome sacroilíaca unilateral, 31,11 (17,37 DP) e com síndrome sacroilíaca bilateral 40,32 (17,46 DP). Quando comparada a média de dor entre as síndromes mediante a EVA, a síndrome da cintura pélvica apresentou a maior média (7,67; 1,72 DP), seguida pela síndrome sacroilíaca bilateral (6,86; 1,95 DP) e síndrome sacroilíaca unilateral (6,21; 1,72 DP). Ao correlacionar a média da EVA com o escore total do PGQ-Brasil, observou-se uma correlação positiva (r=0,458, p=0,01), indicando que quanto maior a dor, maior a incapacidade da gestante. Dessa forma, os achados sugerem que a DCPG pode acarretar diversos níveis de incapacidade e afetar diretamente a funcionalidade das gestantes.

          Translated abstract

          RESUMEN A fin de evaluar la repercusión del dolor pélvico en la funcionalidad de embarazadas, se realizó un estudio transversal con mujeres embarazadas, entre 18 y 30 años de edad y diagnosticadas clínicamente con dolor pélvico en el embarazo (DPE). Se recolectaron datos clínicos, después de aplicado la versión brasileña del Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ-Brasil). Han participado del estudio 105 embarazadas, de las cuales 62,9% eran multíparas. El diagnóstico más común fue el síndrome sacroilíaco unilateral. Al respecto de la aparición del dolor, un 45,7% dijeron que este dolor ocurría en movimientos y las actividades que les presentaban una mayor limitación eran estar sentada, de pie y caminar por más de 60 minutos. El promedio del dolor en la escala visual analógica (EVA) fue de 6,59 (1,8 DP), considerado un dolor moderado. Las embarazadas con el síndrome pélvico presentaron el promedio de 54,86 (22,39 DP) para la puntuación total del PGQ-Brasil, las con síndrome sacroilíaco unilateral 31,11 (17,37 DP) y con síndrome sacroilíaco bilateral 40,32 (17,46 DP). Al compararse el promedio de dolor entre los síndromes utilizando la EVA, el síndrome pélvico presentó el promedio mayor (7,67; 1,72 DP), enseguida del síndrome sacroilíaco bilateral (6,86; 1,95 DP) y del síndrome sacroilíaco unilateral (6,21; 1,72 DP). Al correlacionarse el promedio de EVA con la puntuación total del PGQ-Brasil, se ha observado una correlación positiva (r=0,458, p=0,01), que muestra que cuanto mayor es el dolor, mayor será la incapacidad de la embarazada. De esta manera, los resultados mostraron que el DPE puede resultar en diversos niveles de incapacidad y puede afectar directamente a la funcionalidad de las embarazadas.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT To analyze the impact of pelvic girdle pain on pregnant women's functionality, a cross-sectional study involving pregnant women, aged between 18 and 30 years, with a clinical diagnosis of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PGPP) was performed. Clinical data were collected followed by the application of the Brazilian version of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ-Brazil). One hundred and five pregnant women participated, of which 62.9% were multiparous. The most frequent diagnostic was the unilateral sacroiliac syndrome. About the onset of pain, 45.7% of them reported that pain occurred on movement and the activities that had greater limitation were sitting, standing, and walking for more than 60 minutes. The average pain according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was 6.59 (SD 1.8), considered a moderate pain. Pregnant women with pelvic girdle syndrome had a mean of 54.86 (SD 22.39) for the total score of PGQ-Brazil; with unilateral sacroiliac syndrome, 31.11 (SD 17.37); and bilateral sacroiliac syndrome, 40.32 (SD 17.46). When the average pain was compared among the groups assessed by the VAS, the pelvic girdle syndrome had the highest average pain (7.67; SD 1.72), followed by bilateral sacroiliac syndrome (6.86; SD 1.95), and the unilateral sacroiliac syndrome (6.21; SD 1.72). By correlating the average VAS with the total score of PGQ-Brazil, there was a positive correlation (r=0.458, p=0.01), indicating that the greater the pain, the greater the level of disability of the pregnant woman. The findings suggest that PGPP may result in different levels of disability, which may directly affect the pregnant women's functionality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence.

          Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain has puzzled medicine for a long time. The present systematic review focuses on terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Numerous terms are used, as if they indicated one and the same entity. We propose "pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP)", and "pregnancy-related low back pain (PLBP)", present evidence that the two add up to "lumbopelvic pain", and show that they are distinct entities (although underlying mechanisms may be similar). Average pain intensity during pregnancy is 50 mm on a visual analogue scale; postpartum, pain is less. During pregnancy, serious pain occurs in about 25%, and severe disability in about 8% of patients. After pregnancy, problems are serious in about 7%. The mechanisms behind disabilities remain unclear, and constitute an important research priority. Changes in muscle activity, unusual perceptions of the leg when moving it, and altered motor coordination were observed but remain poorly understood. Published prevalence for PPP and/or PLBP varies widely. Quantitative analysis was used to explain the differences. Overall, about 45% of all pregnant women and 25% of all women postpartum suffer from PPP and/or PLBP. These values decrease by about 20% if one excludes mild complaints. Strenuous work, previous low back pain, and previous PPP and/or PLBP are risk factors, and the inclusion/exclusion of high-risk subgroups influences prevalence. Of all patients, about one-half have PPP, one-third PLBP, and one-sixth both conditions combined. Overall, the literature reveals that PPP deserves serious attention from the clinical and research communities, at all times and in all countries.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain.

            The aim of the present study was to describe, on the basis of specific classification criteria and for a period of two years after delivery, the prognosis for women suffering from pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain, and to describe the characteristics influencing the prognosis. One thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine pregnant women who were booked for delivery at Odense University Hospital formed a cohort to investigate the prognosis. Women whose reported daily pain from pelvic joints could be objectively confirmed were divided, according to symptoms, into five subgroups (n=405) - four classification groups (pelvic girdle syndrome, symphysiolysis, one-sided sacroiliac syndrome and double-sided sacroiliac syndrome) and one miscellaneous. The women in the five subgroups were re-examined at regular intervals for two years after delivery or until disappearance of symptoms (whichever was less). Thre hundred and forty-one women from the 5 subgroups participated in the postpartum follow-up. The majority (62.5%) of women in the four classification groups experienced disappearance of pain within a month after delivery. Two years after parturition 8.6% were still suffering from pelvic joint pain (determined subjectively and objectively). Persistence of pain was found to vary significantly from one classification group to another. None of those initially classified as suffering from symphysiolysis had pain 6 months after delivery in comparison to the 21 percent of those with pelvic girdle syndrome who continued to have pain at the two-year mark. This study shows that pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain had an excellent postpartum prognosis (in general) in three out of four classification groups. The women with pelvic girdle syndrome (pain in all 3 pelvic joints) had a markedly worse prognosis than the women in the other three classification groups. High number of positive test and a low mobility index were identified as giving the highest relative risk for long term pain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up.

              This study is a prospective, consecutive, 3-year cohort study of women with back pain in an index pregnancy. The aim was to describe the physical status and disability among women with back pain 3 years after delivery. Pain was identified as lumbar back pain, posterior pelvic pain or combined lumbar as well as posterior pelvic pain. Previous studies have established that all three types of pain can be reduced by structured physiotherapy during pregnancy, and the beneficial effect may last for several years. Though it is known that some women have residual pain for a long time, the relative incidence of the three pain types and their degree of disability associated with each have never been reported. Neither has any study presented findings of a physical examination of women 3 years post partum with a focus on the type of pain. All women who were registered as having experienced back pain during an index pregnancy were interviewed by mail 3 years post partum. Women who had residual back pain filled in an additional questionnaire and were physically examined. Out of 799 pregnant women, 231 had some type of back pain during the index pregnancy, and 41 women had pain 3 years later. Women with combined lumbar and posterior pelvic pain were significantly more disabled ( P<0.05) and had significantly lower endurance in the lumbar back and hip abduction muscles ( P<0.01). Some 5% of all pregnant women, or 20% of all women with back pain during pregnancy, had pain 3 years later. The key problem may be poor muscle function in the back and pelvis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                fp
                Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
                Fisioter. Pesqui.
                Universidade de São Paulo
                2316-9117
                December 2015
                : 22
                : 4
                : 404-410
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Brazil
                [2 ] Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Brazil
                [3 ] Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Brazil
                [4 ] Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Brazil
                Article
                S1809-29502015000400404
                10.590/1809-2950/14342922042015
                ed9d16ab-4921-46d4-aaae-bb2eb4716514

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1809-2950&lng=en
                Categories
                ORTHOPEDICS
                REHABILITATION

                Orthopedics,Physiotherapy
                Embarazo,Actividades Cotidianas,Dolor Pélvico,Cuestionarios,Pregnancy,Activities of Daily Living,Pelvic Girdle Pain,Questionnaires,Gravidez,Atividades Cotidianas,Dor da Cintura Pélvica,Questionários

                Comments

                Comment on this article