17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Combating iron and zinc malnutrition through mineral biofortification in maize through plant growth promoting Bacillus and Paenibacillus species

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The burgeoning population of the world is causing food insecurity not only by less food availability but also by the malnutrition of essential nutrients and vitamins. Malnutrition is mostly linked with food having micronutrients lower than the optimal concentration of that specific food commodity and becoming an emerging challenge over the globe. Microbial biofortification in agriculture ensures nutritional security through microbial nitrogen fixation, and improved phosphate and zinc solubilization, which increase the uptake of these nutrients. The present study evaluates the novel plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to biofortify maize gain.

          Methods

          For this purpose, a pot and two field experiments for maize were conducted. PGPRs were applied alone and in combination for a better understanding of the biofortification potential of these strains. At physiological maturity, the growth parameters, and at harvest, the yield, microbial population, and nutritional status of maize were determined.

          Results and discussion

          Results revealed that the consortium (ZM27+ZM63+S10) has caused the maximum increase in growth under pot studies like plant height (31%), shoot fresh weight (28%), shoot dry weight (27%), root fresh (33%) and dry weights (29%), and microbial count (21%) in the maize rhizosphere. The mineral analysis of the pot trial also revealed that consortium of ZM27+ZM63+S10 has caused 28, 16, 20, 11 and 11% increases in P, N, K, Fe, and Zn contents in maize, respectively, as compared to un-inoculated treatment in pot studies. A similar trend of results was also observed in both field trials as the consortium of ZM27+ZM63+S10 caused the maximum increase in not only growth and biological properties but also caused maximum biofortification of mineral nutrients in maize grains. The grain yield and 1000-grain weight were also found significantly higher 17 and 12%, respectively, under consortium application as compared to control. So, it can be concluded from these significant results obtained from the PGPR consortium application that microbial inoculants play a significant role in enhancing the growth, yield, and quality of the maize. However, the extensive evaluation of the consortium may help in the formulation of a biofertilizer for sustainable production and biofortification of maize to cope with nutritional security.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A comprehensive system of leaf analyses and its use for diagnosing crop nutrient status

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                01 February 2023
                2022
                : 13
                : 1094551
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Soil Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur , Bahawalpur, Pakistan
                [2] 2 Department of environmental science, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University , Sheringal, Pakistan
                [3] 3 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia , Perth, WA, Australia
                [4] 4 National Research Center of Intercropping, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur , Bahawalpur, Pakistan
                [5] 5 Provincial Reference Fertilizer Testing Laboratory, Raiwind Lahore , Lahore, Pakistan
                [6] 6 Institute of Agroindustry and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur , Bahawalpur, Pakistan
                [7] 7 Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [8] 8 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kafrelsheikh , Kafr el-Sheikh, Egypt
                Author notes

                Edited by: Raul Antonio Sperotto, Universidade do Vale do Taquari - Univates, Brazil

                Reviewed by: Arshad Jalal, São Paulo State University, Brazil; Sukamal Sarkar, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute, India; Sancar Bulut, Kayseri University, Turkey

                This article was submitted to Plant Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2022.1094551
                9929565
                36816488
                ed997a2b-b8ad-46f1-9e79-8df8a8aca70c
                Copyright © 2023 Ahmad, Hussain, Dar, Luqman, Ditta, Iqbal, Ahmad, Nazli, Soufan, Almutairi and Sabagh

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 November 2022
                : 19 December 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 7, Equations: 0, References: 72, Pages: 16, Words: 8225
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Agriculture, Faisalabad , doi 10.13039/501100007654;
                Award ID: RSP-2020/180
                This research was funded by the Researchers Supporting Project No. (RSP2023R390), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The research is funded by the Endowment Fund Secretariat (EFS), Project Number (RSP-2020/180), University of Agriculture Faisalabad.
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research

                Plant science & Botany
                food security,undernourished,vitamins,biofortification,pgpr
                Plant science & Botany
                food security, undernourished, vitamins, biofortification, pgpr

                Comments

                Comment on this article