27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Distal radius fractures in children: substantial difference in stability between buckle and greenstick fractures

      research-article
      ,
      Acta Orthopaedica
      Informa Healthcare

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and purpose Numerous follow-up visits for wrist fractures in children are performed without therapeutic consequences. We investigated the degree to which the follow-up visits reveal complications and lead to change in management. The stability of greenstick and buckle fractures of the distal radius was assessed by comparing the lateral angulation radiographically.

          Patients and methods The medical records of 305 distal radius fractures in patients aged less than 16 years treated at our institution in 2006 were reviewed, and any complications were noted. The fracture type was determined from the initial radiographs and the angulation on the lateral films was noted.

          Results Only 1 of 311 follow-ups led to an active intervention. The greenstick fractures had more complications than the buckle fractures. The lateral angulation of the buckle fractures did not change importantly throughout the treatment. The greenstick fractures displaced 5° on average, and continued to displace after the first 2 weeks. On average, the complete fractures displaced 9°.

          Conclusion Buckle fractures are stable and do not require follow-up. Greenstick fractures are unstable and continue to displace after 2 weeks. Complete fractures of the distal radius are uncommon in children, and highly unstable. A precise classification of fracture type at the time of diagnosis would identify a smaller subset of patients that require follow-up.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Incidence of childhood distal forearm fractures over 30 years: a population-based study.

          The incidence of distal forearm fractures in children peaks around the time of the pubertal growth spurt, possibly because physical activity increases at the time of a transient deficit in cortical bone mass due to the increased calcium demand during maximal skeletal growth. Changes in physical activity or diet may therefore influence risk of forearm fracture. To determine whether there has been a change in the incidence of distal forearm fractures in children in recent years. Population-based study among Rochester, Minn, residents younger than 35 years with distal forearm fractures in 1969-1971, 1979-1981, 1989-1991, and 1999-2001. Estimated incidence of distal forearm fractures in 4 time periods. Comparably age- and sex-adjusted annual incidence rates per 100 000 increased from 263.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 231.1-295.4) in 1969-1971 to 322.3 (95% CI, 285.3-359.4) in 1979-1981 and to 399.8 (95% CI, 361.0-438.6) in 1989-1991 before leveling off at 372.9 (95% CI, 339.1-406.7) in 1999-2001. Age-adjusted incidence rates per 100 000 were 32% greater among male residents in 1999-2001 compared with 1969-1971 (409.4 [95% CI, 359.9-459.0] vs 309.4 [95% CI, 259.3-359.5]; P =.01) and 56% greater among female residents in the same time periods (334.3 [95% CI, 288.6-380.1] vs 214.6 [95% CI, 174.9-254.4]; P<.001). The peak incidence and greatest increase occurred between ages 11 and 14 years in boys and 8 and 11 years in girls. There has been a statistically significant increase in the incidence of distal forearm fractures in children and adolescents, but whether this is due to changing patterns of physical activity, decreased bone acquisition due to poor calcium intake, or both is unclear at present. Given the large number of childhood fractures, however, studies are needed to define the cause(s) of this increase.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epidemiology of children's fractures.

            L. Landin (1997)
            Fractures constitute 10% to 25% of all pediatric injuries and are more common in boys than in girls, and after age 13 or 14 years are twice as common. The results from an epidemiologic study in Malmö indicate that a child's risk of sustaining a fracture is 42% in boys and 27% in girls from birth to age 16 years. Fractures of the distal end of the radius are the most common injury, followed by fractures of the phalanges of the hand. From 1950 to 1979 there was a twofold increase in the risk of fracture, due to an increase in light-energy trauma, mainly sporting activities. Since the end of the 1970s there has been no further increase in the fracture risk. The data also indicate that preventive measures have been effective in decreasing severe accidents.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk factors in redisplacement of distal radial fractures in children.

              The causes of redisplacement following closed treatment of distal metaphyseal radial fractures in children are still controversial. Various risk factors and radiographic indices have been suggested to predict redisplacement. The aims of this study were to prospectively identify the causes of redisplacement and to test the accuracy of previously described radiographic indices and our new method, the "three-point index." This prospective study included seventy-five displaced or severely angulated distal radial fractures in seventy-four children under the age of fifteen years. Age, gender, initial complete displacement of the radius, an associated ulnar fracture, the accuracy of the reduction, the maximum degree of obliquity of the fracture line in the sagittal or coronal plane, and the distance to the physis were examined as possible risk factors. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to search for risk factors. We also calculated the cast index, padding index, Canterbury index, gap index, and three-point index on the radiographs of each reduction. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were calculated for each test. Initial complete displacement and the degree of obliquity of the fracture were the most important risk factors for redisplacement. Fractures that were completely displaced initially were 11.7 times more likely to redisplace than were angulated but incompletely displaced fractures. A 20 degree oblique fracture was 4.9 times more likely to redisplace and a 30 degree oblique fracture was 10.9 times more likely to redisplace than was a 0 degree true transverse fracture. The three-point index was superior to the other radiographic indices for predicting redisplacement, with a sensitivity of 94.7%, a specificity of 95.2%, a negative predictive value of 98.4%, and a positive predictive value of 85.7%. The gap index was the next-best measure, but it had a sensitivity of 63.2%, a specificity of 76.2%, a negative predictive value of 87.3%, and a positive predictive value of 44.4%. Initial complete displacement and the degree of obliquity of the fracture line are the dominant factors affecting redisplacement. Our new radiographic index, the three-point index, should be used to predict redisplacement and assess the quality of the cast treatment of these fractures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acta Orthop
                ORT
                Acta Orthopaedica
                Informa Healthcare
                1745-3674
                1745-3682
                1 October 2009
                1 October 2009
                : 80
                : 5
                : 585-589
                Affiliations
                simpleDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital Norway
                Author notes
                Correspondence: pran@ 123456ahus.no
                Article
                SORT_A_431859_O
                10.3109/17453670903316850
                2823323
                19916694
                ed4fd0e6-74b0-4551-b36d-c7d2de61b44f
                Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.

                History
                : 05 March 2009
                : 28 May 2009
                Categories
                Research Article

                Orthopedics
                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article