9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracic surgery: a study protocol for a prospective randomized open label non-inferiority trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Thoracic epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard for pain relief in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. This neuraxial technique blocks pain sensation by injecting a local anesthetic agent in the epidural space near the spinal cord to block spinal nerve roots. Recently, the erector spinae plane block has been introduced as a practical alternative to the thoracic epidural. This interfascial regional anesthesia technique interrupts pain sensation by injecting a local anesthetic agent in between the muscular layers of the thoracic wall. Several case series and three RCTs described it as an effective pain management technique in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (Scimia et al., Reg Anesth Pain Med 42:537, 2017; Adhikary et al., Indian J Anaesth 62:75–8, 2018; Kim, A randomized controlled trial comparing continuous erector spinae plane block with thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative pain management in video-assisted thoracic surgery, n.d.; Yao et al., J Clin Anesth 63:109783, 2020; Ciftci et al., J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 34:444–9, 2020).

          The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that a continuous erector spinae plane block incorporated into an opioid-based systemic multimodal analgesia regimen is non-inferior in terms of the quality of postoperative recovery compared to continuous thoracic epidural local anesthetic-opioid analgesia in patients undergoing elective unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

          Methods

          This is a prospective randomized open label non-inferiority trial. A total of 90 adult patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery will be randomized 1:1 to receive pain treatment with either (1) continuous erector spinae plane block plus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with piritramide (study group) or (2) continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with a local anesthetic-opioid infusate (control group). All patients will receive additional systemic multimodal analgesia with paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The primary endpoint is the quality of recovery as measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 score. Secondary endpoints are postoperative pain as Numerical Rating Score scores, length of hospital stay, failure of analgesic technique, postoperative morphine-equivalent consumption, itching, nausea and vomiting, total operative time, complications related to surgery, perioperative hypotension, complications related to pain treatment, duration of bladder catheterization, and time of first assisted mobilization > 20 m and of mobilization to sitting in a chair.

          Discussion

          This randomized controlled trial aims to confirm whether continuous erector spinae plane block plus patient-controlled opioid analgesia can equal the analgesic effect of a thoracic epidural local anesthetic-opioid infusion in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

          Trial registration

          Netherlands Trial Register NL6433. Registered on 1 March 2018. This trial was prospectively registered.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Erector Spinae Plane Block

          Thoracic neuropathic pain is a debilitating condition that is often poorly responsive to oral and topical pharmacotherapy. The benefit of interventional nerve block procedures is unclear due to a paucity of evidence and the invasiveness of the described techniques. In this report, we describe a novel interfascial plane block, the erector spinae plane (ESP) block, and its successful application in 2 cases of severe neuropathic pain (the first resulting from metastatic disease of the ribs, and the second from malunion of multiple rib fractures). In both cases, the ESP block also produced an extensive multidermatomal sensory block. Anatomical and radiological investigation in fresh cadavers indicates that its likely site of action is at the dorsal and ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerves. The ESP block holds promise as a simple and safe technique for thoracic analgesia in both chronic neuropathic pain as well as acute postsurgical or posttraumatic pain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999.

            Central neuraxial blockades find widespread applications. Severe complications are believed to be extremely rare, but the incidence is probably underestimated. A retrospective study of severe neurologic complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999 was performed. Information was obtained from a postal survey and administrative files in the health care system. During the study period approximately 1,260,000 spinal blockades and 450,000 epidural blockades were administered, including 200,000 epidural blockades for pain relief in labor. : The 127 complications found included spinal hematoma (33), cauda equina syndrome (32), meningitis (29), epidural abscess (13), and miscellaneous (20). Permanent neurologic damage was observed in 85 patients. Incidence of complications after spinal blockade was within 1:20-30,000 in all patient groups. Incidence after obstetric epidural blockade was 1:25,000; in the remaining patients it was 1:3600 (P < 0.0001). Spinal hematoma after obstetric epidural blockade carried the incidence 1:200,000, significantly lower than the incidence 1:3,600 females subject to knee arthroplasty (P < 0.0001). : More complications than expected were found, probably as a result of the comprehensive study design. Half of the complications were retrieved exclusively from administrative files. Complications occur significantly more often after epidural blockade than after spinal blockade, and the complications are different. Obstetric patients carry significantly lower incidence of complications. Osteoporosis is proposed as a previously neglected risk factor. Close surveillance after central neuraxial blockade is mandatory for safe practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales.

              Several quality of recovery (QoR) health status scales have been developed to quantify the patient's experience after anesthesia and surgery, but to date, it is unclear what constitutes the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). That is, what minimal change in score would indicate a meaningful change in a patient's health status?
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Renee.vd.broek@catharinaziekenhuis.nl
                KoopmanJ@maasstadziekenhuis.nl
                PostemaJ@maasstadziekenuis.nl
                Niels.verberkmoes@catharinaziekenhuis.nl
                gasgenie@gmail.com
                Arthur.bouwman@catharinaziekenhuis.nl
                Barbara.versyck@azturnhout.be
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                4 May 2021
                4 May 2021
                2021
                : 22
                : 321
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.413532.2, ISNI 0000 0004 0398 8384, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, , Catharina Hospital, ; Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623 EJ The Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.416213.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0460 0556, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, , Maasstad Hospital, ; Maasstadweg 21, Rotterdam, 3079 DZ the Netherlands
                [3 ]GRID grid.413532.2, ISNI 0000 0004 0398 8384, Heart Center Catharina Hospital, ; Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623 EJ the Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, , University of Toronto, ; 339 Bathurst St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8 Canada
                [5 ]GRID grid.476094.8, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, , AZ Turnhout, ; Steenweg op Merksplas 44, 2300 Turnhout, Belgium
                Article
                5275
                10.1186/s13063-021-05275-9
                8094519
                33947442
                ed13dd5d-4a5c-48f3-958d-33cf09ad42b2
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 18 June 2020
                : 15 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Stichting Onderzoeksfonds Catharina ziekenhuis
                Award ID: 2018-7
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Medicine
                erector spinae plane block,thoracic epidural analgesia,regional anesthesia,postoperative pain,video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery,pain management,randomized controlled trial

                Comments

                Comment on this article