72
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Low-Cost Ultrasound Program Leads to Increased Antenatal Clinic Visits and Attended Deliveries at a Health Care Clinic in Rural Uganda

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In June of 2010, an antenatal ultrasound program to perform basic screening for high-risk pregnancies was introduced at a community health care center in rural Uganda. Whether the addition of ultrasound scanning to antenatal visits at the health center would encourage or discourage potential patients was unknown. Our study sought to evaluate trends in the numbers of antenatal visits and deliveries at the clinic, pre- and post-introduction of antenatal ultrasound to determine what effect the presence of ultrasound at the clinic had on these metrics.

          Methods and Findings

          Records at Nawanyago clinic were reviewed to obtain the number of antenatal visits and deliveries for the 42 months preceding the introduction of ultrasound and the 23 months following. The monthly mean deliveries and antenatal visits by category (first visit through fourth return visit) were compared pre- and post- ultrasound using a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. Following the introduction of ultrasound, significant increases were seen in the number of mean monthly deliveries and antenatal visits. The mean number of monthly deliveries at the clinic increased by 17.0 (13.3–20.6, 95% CI) from a pre-ultrasound average of 28.4 to a post-ultrasound monthly average of 45.4. The number of deliveries at a comparison clinic remained flat over this same time period. The monthly mean number of antenatal visits increased by 97.4 (83.3–111.5, 95% CI) from a baseline monthly average of 133.5 to a post-ultrasound monthly mean of 231.0, with increases seen in all categories of antenatal visits.

          Conclusions

          The availability of a low-cost antenatal ultrasound program may assist progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5 by encouraging women in a rural environment to come to a health care facility for skilled antenatal care and delivery assistance instead of utilizing more traditional methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Top ten biotechnologies for improving health in developing countries.

          Most research into genomics and other related biotechnologies is concerned with the priorities of industrialized nations, and yet a limited number of projects have shown that these technologies could help improve health in developing countries. To encourage the successful application of biotechnology to global health, we carried out a study in which we asked an international group of eminent scientists with expertise in global health issues to identify the top ten biotechnologies for improving health in developing countries. The results offer concrete guidance to those in a position to influence the direction of research and development, and challenge common assumptions about the relevance and affordability of biotechnology for developing countries.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Strategies for reducing maternal mortality in developing countries: what can we learn from the history of the industrialized West?

            Ten years of Safe Motherhood Initiative notwithstanding, many developing countries still experience maternal mortality levels similar to those of industrialized countries in the early 20th century. This paper analyses the conditions under which the industrialized world has reduced maternal mortality over the last 100 years. Preconditions appear to have been early awareness of the magnitude of the problem, recognition that most maternal deaths are avoidable, and mobilization of professionals and the community. Still, there were considerable differences in the timing and speed of reduction of maternal mortality between countries, related to the way professionalization of delivery care was determined: firstly, by the willingness of the decision-makers to take up their responsibility; secondly, by making modern obstetrical care available to the population (particularly by encouragement or dissuasion of midwifery care); and thirdly, by the extent to which professionals were held accountable for addressing maternal health in an effective way. Reduction of maternal mortality in developing countries today is hindered by limited awareness of the magnitude and manageability of the problem, and ill-informed professionalization strategies focusing on antenatal care and training of traditional birth attendants. These strategies have by and large been ineffective and diverted attention from development of professional first-line midwifery and second-line hospital delivery care.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Is antenatal care effective in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality?

              Women in developing countries are dying from simple preventable conditions but what impact can the procedures collectively called antenatal care having in reducing maternal mortality and morbidity? More importantly what is antenatal care? This review found that questions have been raised about the impact of antenatal care (specifically on maternal mortality) since its inception in developed countries, and that although the questions continue to be asked there is very little research trying to find answers. Many antenatal procedures are essentially screening tests yet it was found that there were very few results showing sensitivity and specificity, and that they rarely complied with the established criteria for the effectiveness of a screening test. The acknowledged gold standard measurement of effectiveness is the randomized controlled trial, yet the only results available referred to nutritional supplementation. This service of flawed methodology has been exported to developing countries and is being promoted by WHO and other agencies. This paper argues that there is insufficient evidence to reach a firm decision about the effectiveness of antenatal care, yet there is sufficient evidence to cast doubt on the possible effect of antenatal care. Research is urgently required in order to identify those procedures which ought to be included in the antenatal process. In the final analysis the greatest impact will be achieved by developing a domiciliary midwifery service supported by appropriate local efficient obstetric services. That this domiciliary service should provide care for women in pregnancy is not disputed but the specific nature of this care needs considerable clarification.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                30 October 2013
                : 8
                : 10
                : e78450
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America
                [2 ]Ultrasound Research and Development, Philips Healthcare, Philips Innovation Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
                [3 ]Research Division, Philips Healthcare, Bothell, Washington, United States of America
                [4 ]University of Vermont College of Medicine, Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America
                [5 ]Philips Health Care, Andover, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [6 ]Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Hospital, Washington, DC, United States of America
                [7 ]Department of Surgery, Kamuli Mission Hospital, Kamuli, Uganda
                [8 ]Ernest Cook Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Mengo Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
                Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran (Islamic Republic Of)
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: Funding for this study was provided by Imaging the World which received funding from the Fineberg Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Philips Health Care, McKesson Corporation, and Peervue Corporation. Several authors including MR, SS, MN, and EZS are employees of Philips Health Care. Author KD reports receiving consultancy fees from Philips Health Care. All of the other authors have no relevant personal financial disclosures to reveal. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: KD BG MGK AM MR. Performed the experiments: KD BG MGK AM. Analyzed the data: ABR MR SS MN. Wrote the paper: ABR KD MR GEM MN SS ES.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-27882
                10.1371/journal.pone.0078450
                3813603
                24205234
                ecb68ae3-5e24-4ded-8c19-62c80d7aeaf5
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 18 June 2013
                : 9 September 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funding for this study was provided by Imaging the World which received funding from the Fineberg Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Philips Health Care, McKesson Corporation, and Peervue Corporation. This research was also supported (in part) by an Alpha Omega Alpha postgraduate award. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article