0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genetic Variants of the TERT Gene, Telomere Length, and Circulating TERT as Prognostic Markers in Rectal Cancer Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TERT gene, which encode the catalytic component of telomerase, can affect TERT expression and constitutive telomere length and have been associated with risk and/or outcome for several human cancers, but very few data are available about their impact on rectal cancer. The aim of our study was to comprehensively investigate the associations of eight common TERT SNPs with telomere length, circulating TERT mRNA in plasma, response to neoadjuvant therapy (CRT) and disease outcome in rectal cancer patients. Our findings indicate that the TERT variants can differently contribute to telomere erosion during CRT, circulating TERT levels and response to CRT. Thus, they could be a useful tool for improving the selection of patients who might benefit from CRT. Furthermore, circulating TERT variation during CRT and its level post-CRT are independent markers of response to CRT and disease progression.

          Abstract

          Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TERT gene can affect telomere length and TERT expression and have been associated with risk and/or outcome for several tumors, but very few data are available about their impact on rectal cancer. Eight SNPs (rs2736108, rs2735940, rs2736098, rs2736100, rs35241335, rs11742908, rs2736122 and rs2853690), mapping in regulatory and coding regions of the TERT gene, were studied in 194 rectal cancer patients to evaluate their association with constitutive telomere length, circulating TERT mRNA levels, response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and disease outcome. At diagnosis, the rs2736100CC genotype was associated with longer telomeres measured pre-CRT, while the rs2736100CC, rs2736108TT and rs2735940AA were associated with greater telomere erosion evaluated post-CRT. The rs2736108CC and rs2853690AA/GG genotypes, respectively associated with lower telomere erosion and lower levels of circulating TERT post-CRT, were also independently associated with a better response to therapy [OR 4.6(1.1–19.1) and 3.0(1.3–6.9)]. Overall, post-CRT, low levels (≤ median value) of circulating TERT and its stable/decreasing levels compared to those pre-CRT, were independently associated with a better response to therapy [OR 5.8(1.9–17.8) and 5.3(1.4–19.4), respectively]. Furthermore, post-CRT, patients with long telomeres (>median value) and low levels of circulating TERT had a significantly lower risk of disease progression [HR 0.4(0.1–0.9) and 0.3(0.1–0.8), respectively]. These findings suggest that TERT SNPs could be a useful tool for improving the selection of patients who could benefit from CRT and support the role of telomere length and circulating TERT mRNA levels as useful markers for monitoring the response to therapy and disease outcome in rectal cancer patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging.

          The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual has become the benchmark for classifying patients with cancer, defining prognosis, and determining the best treatment approaches. Many view the primary role of the tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) system as that of a standardized classification system for evaluating cancer at a population level in terms of the extent of disease, both at initial presentation and after surgical treatment, and the overall impact of improvements in cancer treatment. The rapid evolution of knowledge in cancer biology and the discovery and validation of biologic factors that predict cancer outcome and response to treatment with better accuracy have led some cancer experts to question the utility of a TNM-based approach in clinical care at an individualized patient level. In the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, the goal of including relevant, nonanatomic (including molecular) factors has been foremost, although changes are made only when there is strong evidence for inclusion. The editorial board viewed this iteration as a proactive effort to continue to build the important bridge from a "population-based" to a more "personalized" approach to patient classification, one that forms the conceptual framework and foundation of cancer staging in the era of precision molecular oncology. The AJCC promulgates best staging practices through each new edition in an effort to provide cancer care providers with a powerful, knowledge-based resource for the battle against cancer. In this commentary, the authors highlight the overall organizational and structural changes as well as "what's new" in the Eighth Edition. It is hoped that this information will provide the reader with a better understanding of the rationale behind the aggregate proposed changes and the exciting developments in the upcoming edition. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:93-99. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM.

            The American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union for Cancer Control update the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) cancer staging system periodically. The most recent revision is the 7th edition, effective for cancers diagnosed on or after January 1, 2010. This editorial summarizes the background of the current revision and outlines the major issues revised. Most notable are the marked increase in the use of international datasets for more highly evidenced-based changes in staging, and the enhanced use of nonanatomic prognostic factors in defining the stage grouping. The future of cancer staging lies in the use of enhanced registry data standards to support personalization of cancer care through cancer outcome prediction models and nomograms.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies.

              5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely used in the treatment of cancer. Over the past 20 years, increased understanding of the mechanism of action of 5-FU has led to the development of strategies that increase its anticancer activity. Despite these advances, drug resistance remains a significant limitation to the clinical use of 5-FU. Emerging technologies, such as DNA microarray profiling, have the potential to identify novel genes that are involved in mediating resistance to 5-FU. Such target genes might prove to be therapeutically valuable as new targets for chemotherapy, or as predictive biomarkers of response to 5-FU-based chemotherapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                25 October 2020
                November 2020
                : 12
                : 11
                : 3115
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Section of Oncology and Immunology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padova, Italy; silvia.giunco@ 123456unipd.it (S.G.); anita.derossi@ 123456unipd.it (A.D.R.)
                [2 ]Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO)-IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano (PN), Italy; ececchin@ 123456cro.it (E.C.); gtoffoli@ 123456cro.it (G.T.)
                [3 ]Clinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV)-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padova, Italy; paola.delbianco@ 123456iov.veneto.it
                [4 ]Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV)-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padova, Italy; chiara.menin@ 123456iov.veneto.it
                [5 ]Section of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Via Giustiniani 1, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; gaya.spolverato@ 123456unipd.it (G.S.); puc@ 123456unipd.it (S.P.)
                [6 ]Medical Oncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV)-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padova, Italy; sara.lonardi@ 123456iov.veneto.it
                [7 ]Eurac Research, Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Viale Druso Drususallee 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; sandro.malacrida@ 123456eurac.edu
                [8 ]Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO)-IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano (PN), Italy; adepaoli@ 123456cro.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: enrica.rampazzo@ 123456unipd.it ; Tel.: +39-049-821-5831
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9996-2925
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-7490
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6597-0265
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8907-772X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-1478
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4775-3857
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5323-4762
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-7509
                Article
                cancers-12-03115
                10.3390/cancers12113115
                7692334
                33113831
                ec8fc6fb-cae8-4164-aaf9-8ffc89ecefad
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 23 September 2020
                : 23 October 2020
                Categories
                Article

                tert,telomerase,snps,variants,telomere length,circulating tert mrna,plasma,rectal cancer,neoadjuvant therapy,prognostic markers

                Comments

                Comment on this article