20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      International recognition of the Ilizarov bone reconstruction techniques: Current practice and research (dedicated to 100 th birthday of G. A. Ilizarov)

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Ilizarov method is one of the current methods used in bone reconstruction. It originated in the middle of the past century and comprises a number of bone reconstruction techniques executed with a ring external fixator developed by Ilizarov GA. Its main merits are viable new bone formation through distraction osteogenesis, high union rates and functional use of the limb throughout the course of treatment. The study of the phenomenon of distraction osteogenesis induced by tension stress with the Ilizarov apparatus was the impetus for advancement in bone reconstruction surgery. Since then, the original method has been used along with a number of its modifications developed due to emergence of new fixation devices and techniques of their application such as hexapod external fixators and motorized intramedullary lengthening nails. They gave rise to a relatively new orthopedic subspecialty termed “limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery”. Based on a comprehensive literature search, we summarized the recent clinical practice and research in bone reconstruction by the Ilizarov method with a special focus on its modification and recognition by the world orthopedic community. The international influence of the Ilizarov method was reviewed in regard to the origin country of the authors and journal’s rating. The Ilizarov method and other techniques based on distraction osteogenesis have been used in many countries and on all populated continents. It proves its international significance and confirms the greatest contribution of Ilizarov GA to bone reconstruction surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references140

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Application of the Tension-Stress Effect for Limb Lengthening

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Management of critical-sized bone defects in the treatment of fracture-related infection: a systematic review and pooled analysis

              Purpose This systematic review determined the reported treatment strategies, their individual success rates, and other outcome parameters in the management of critical-sized bone defects in fracture-related infection (FRI) patients between 1990 and 2018. Methods A systematic literature search on treatment and outcome of critical-sized bone defects in FRI was performed. Treatment strategies identified were, autologous cancellous grafts, autologous cancellous grafts combined with local antibiotics, the induced membrane technique, vascularized grafts, Ilizarov bone transport, and bone transport combined with local antibiotics. Outcomes were bone healing and infection eradication after primary surgical protocol and recurrence of FRI and amputations at the end of study period. Results Fifty studies were included, describing 1530 patients, the tibia was affected in 82%. Mean age was 40 years (range 6–80), with predominantly male subjects (79%). Mean duration of infection was 17 months (range 1–624) and mean follow-up 51 months (range 6–126). After initial protocolized treatment, FRI was cured in 83% (95% CI 79–87) of all cases, increasing to 94% (95% CI 92–96) at the end of each individual study. Recurrence of infection was seen in 8% (95% CI 6–11) and amputation in 3% (95% CI 2–3). Final outcomes overlapped across treatment strategies. Conclusion Results should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective and observational design of most studies, the lack of clear classification systems, incomplete data reports, potential underreporting of adverse outcomes, and heterogeneity in patient series. A consensus on classification, treatment protocols, and outcome is needed to improve reliability of future studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Orthop
                WJO
                World Journal of Orthopedics
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                2218-5836
                18 August 2021
                18 August 2021
                : 12
                : 8
                : 515-533
                Affiliations
                Department of Medical Information and Analysis, Ilizarov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Kurgan 640014, Russia. tmalkova@ 123456mail.ru
                Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ural State Medical University, Ekaterinburg 620109, Russia
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Malkova TA contributed to the acquisition of data; both authors Malkova TA and Borzunov DY contributed to the conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript.

                Corresponding author: Tatiana A Malkova, Department of Medical Information and Analysis, Ilizarov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics, 6, M. Ulianova Street, Kurgan 640014, Russia. tmalkova@ 123456mail.ru

                Article
                jWJO.v12.i8.pg515
                10.5312/wjo.v12.i8.515
                8384611
                34485099
                ec5858d6-bf8c-4139-9f23-82c1464b2623
                ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 15 February 2021
                : 8 April 2021
                : 9 July 2021
                Categories
                Review

                ilizarov method,ilizarov apparatus,distraction osteogenesis,bone lengthening,bone defect,bone transport,arthrodesis

                Comments

                Comment on this article