14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Police savagery during COVID-19 pandemic in India; psychological perspective – Correspondence

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor While the current global pandemic of COVID-19 has posed a major challenge all over the globe, developing countries like India are still doing its best to protect the public's health by limiting the spread of the virus. People are witness to lengthy and strict pandemic lockdowns. In theory, lockdowns have prevented hospitals from being overwhelmed. One of the first steps in attempting to contain the spread of COVID-19 has been to restrict people's movements; however, not everyone has the luxury of staying at home. Those affected by the lockdowns have already been disproportionately affected due to loss of livelihood and lack of food, shelter, health, and other basic needs. There was a mass exodus among the working poor during the lockdowns who migrated from cites back to villages. As torture and other forms of ill-treatment are often committed in prisons and detentions, we increasingly see them on the Indian streets, at checkpoints, and during curfew enforcement by law enforcing agencies [1]. Unlike the scenario in other developed countries, Indian police force is extremely diverse depending on the states, regions or even language belts of India. Therefore, it is unwise to see them through a similar lens. Also, educational level, preliminary skills before recruitment to police force, level of corruption, financial benefits, political influences, and almost all possible factors are different among the police force of India. In general, the police is ill-equipped to deal with most natural disasters, rather the police is often tied by orders of politicians. Because of minimum independence in their life, policemen often suffer from demoralization. Most of the time, policemen are little aware of mental health issues even though they are also the silent victims of stress, alcoholism, depression or suicide [2,3]. There is a culture of toxic masculinity and perceived superiority among policemen who might have been influenced by their acceptance of all the government policies [4]. Also, it is possible that corruption level has skyrocketed during the pandemic season. On one hand, the police has to deal with the high level of work volume which might have caused a significant amount of stress, and it is also possible that the situation might have worked as a positive factor where they have got a sense of purpose. On a negative note, it is not impossible that the pandemic works in favor of earning more cash by unfair means. It cannot be ignored that the level of violence inflicted by police on the general population has been extremely high, which might have served the purpose of their superiority, or it might be a reflection of their stress level [5]. As most surveys during corona hours are done online or via convenience sampling, it is not appropriate to tell that police personnel are more vulnerable than the general population due to the COVID virus [[6], [7], [8]]. We must think about those common populations who have lost their jobs, have to migrate from state to state, and have died on the roads - the conditions that the police might be much better than some groups of the common populations [9]. Nonetheless, it is high time that the police force should get ready for any future environmental or psychological disaster as their behavior often influences social architecture. Several studies have reported human right abuse by police officers as a result of ensuring compliance with lockdown measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Others include use of unwarranted force and gross misconduct by police all over the world [[10], [11], [12], [13]]. As there have been massive lockdowns around the world due to the Covid-19 pandemic, with incidents which pose among the worst governance crises of the twentieth century. Law enforcement agencies have been tasked with enforcing lockdown restrictions. Negative experiences between the public and the police have been, therefore, natural. A study conducted in 10 states titled ‘Policing in the Covid-19 Pandemic’ revealed astonishing findings [14]. The study was conducted in the states like NCT of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Andra Pradesh, Tamil, Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Maharashtra and Gujarat. In the lockdowns, more than half (56%) of the population saw police helping civilians. However, a similar proportion of respondents (58%) also witnessed the police frequently using force during lockdowns. There was frequent conflicts between civilians and police during the lockdown, according to one in three common people (33%) who reported it. During the lockdown, most common people (55%) reported being afraid of the police. Five in ten were concerned about being fined (57%) and beaten by the police (55%). Almost one of two police personnel (49%) reported frequently using force against migrant workers returning home. A third of police personnel (33%) reported preventing migrants from entering shelters with force when the migrants were trying to do so [14]. More than three-quarters (64%) believed that a longer notice before the lockdown could have prevented the migrant crisis. During the lockdowns, there was a distinct class divide in the perceptions of the police. Poor people and those from lower social classes were more afraid of the police during the lockdowns, particularly of police violence. The police's instructions were also more likely to be perceived as threatening during this period. According to the cops, poor localities were also less likely to adhere to lockdown guidelines when compared to the affluent areas. Eighty-six percent of common people (86%) expressed a positive view of the police's behavior during the lockdowns. The behavior was rated as very good by a quarter (25%) and as good by three out of five (61%) respondents [14]. Challenges • Police officers generally are poorly prepared, equipped, nor trained properly to respond or assist in public health crisis requiring enforcement of newly formed laws. • In cases of response to emergency calls, not all responding officers are trained in crisis management for persons with mental health disorders. This results in mishandling and mismanagement of situations leading to police violence. • Use of military equipment against unarmed civilians in any opportunity the police force finds. This facilitates the mistrust against them by the populace. Recommendations • There is a need to train and re-train police personnel, especially in procedural justice focusing on fairness, and to gain more education for respect on human rights of citizens to reduce widespread mistrust of police by the populace. Training reduces biases among the police officers and facilitates de-escalation. • People's trust for the police should be enhanced through police public relations enlightenment programs and campaigns. Doing this will enhance the quality of policing during any crisis, including the current COVID-19 pandemic. It will also promote interaction between police officers and citizens. • Effective monitoring system should be put in place to provide strict punishment for erring police officers who breach the law and cause human right abuse, particularly sexual and physical violence against the populace. There should also be a means of tracking complaints made against police officers, and making the data publicly available. • Legislation should be made to prohibit rehiring police officers who have been terminated from services as a result of a serious misconduct. • There should be programs for crisis assistance with the aim of preventing situations where crisis is mismanaged. Emergency call response should go along side with police officers, crisis workers and mental health providers so that they can work together when responding to incidents involving substance abuse, mental health crises, and homelessness. This can work to minimize violence especially by police officers. • Reinstating limits around what type of gear can and should be used by local law enforcement agencies to help reduce police-inflicted violence and death. • Community policing is an alternative to the “Broken Windows” style policing that crack down hard on minor infractions, and flooding neighborhoods with police enforcement. • There should be an independent and civilian oversight of police departments with the aim of reducing bad behavior. A study in 2016 reported that complaints made by citizens for investigation was more effective when reviewed by an outside agency [15]. They are more likely to merit the complaint than dismissing it. Others include citizen watchdog (policing the police) which has grown especially with video-equipped smartphones. In the back drop of all these, we suggest police should adopt the policy of police of no harm. Education and human right should be taught, and brought into the curriculum. There is no one-size-fits-all answer to the issues as mentioned above. This is a problem that requires zooming out and rising beyond local interests to be seen. The only way out is for citizens to become more informed, with better levels of civic education and political involvement, and to see the vicious loop of this disaster and the perilous condition of affairs to which we are all being led. Until then, we can continue to discuss police reform. Ethical approval N/A. Source of funding N/A. Author contributhon All authors have contributed in writing and reviewing the manuscript. Trail registry number N/A. Guarantor Sheikh Shoib. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned, internally peer-reviewed. Statement The data in this correspondence article is not sensitive in nature and is accessible in the public domain. The data is therefore available and not of a confidential nature. Declaration of competing interest N/A.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Depression, anxiety, and stress and socio-demographic correlates among general Indian public during COVID-19

          The severe outbreak of COVID-19 has affected the mental health of Indians. The objective of this article was to find the prevalence rates of depression, anxiety and stress and their socio-demographic correlates among Indian population during the lockdown to contain the spread of COVID-19. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an electronic questionnaire. A total of 354 participants were recruited through convenience sampling. Depression, anxiety and stress were measured using Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), a 21-item self-reported questionnaire. In total, 25%, 28% and 11.6% of the participants were moderate to extremely severely depressed, anxious and stressed, respectively. Binary logistic regressions indicated employment status (odds ratio (OR) = 1.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.072–3.418) and binge drinking (OR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.045–3.945) were significantly associated with depressive symptoms; gender (OR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.317–3.589), employment status (OR = 1.77; 95% CI: 1.002–3.141) and binge drinking (OR = 2.62; 95% CI: 1.361–5.048) were significantly associated with anxiety symptoms; and binge drinking (OR = 3.42; 95% CI: 1.544–7.583) was significantly associated with stress symptoms. Depression, anxiety and stress among Indian population during the lockdown were prevalent. Along with other measures to contain the spread of COVID-19, mental health of citizens needs the urgent attention of the Indian government and mental health experts. Further large-scale studies should be conducted on different professions and communities such as health care professionals and migrant workers and incorporate other mental health indicators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Limitations of Online Surveys

            Online surveys are growing in popularity, perhaps because they are an easy, convenient, and inexpensive means of data collection. Online surveys commonly suffer from two serious methodological limitations: the population to which they are distributed cannot be described, and respondents with biases may select themselves into the sample. Research is of value only when the findings from a sample can be generalized to a meaningful population. When the population addressed by the survey cannot be described, and when the sample is contaminated by respondents with biases, findings from online surveys cannot be generalized and may therefore mislead.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Police officers: a high-risk group for the development of mental health disturbances? A cohort study

              Objectives Policing is generally considered a high-risk profession for the development of mental health problems, but this assumption lacks empirical evidence. Research question of the present study is to what extent mental health disturbances, such as (very) severe symptoms of anxiety, depression and hostility are more prevalent among police officers than among other occupational groups. Design Multicomparative cross-sectional study using the data of several cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in the Netherlands. Participants Two samples of police officers (N=144 and 503), employees of banks (N=1113) and employees of banks who were robbed (N=144); employees of supermarkets (N=335), and a psychiatric hospital (N=219), employees of a governmental social welfare organisation (N=76), employees who followed a training based on rational-motive therapy to strengthen their assertiveness (N=710), soldiers before deployment (N=278) and before redeployment (N=236) and firefighters (N=123). The numbers refer to respondents with complete data. Primary outcomes Prevalence of severe (subclinical level) and very severe symptoms (clinical level) were computed using the Dutch norm tables (80th percentile and 95th percentile, respectively) of the Symptom Check List Revised (SCL-90-R). All comparisons were controlled for age, gender and education. Results Multivariate logistic regression and analyses showed that the prevalence of clinical and subclinical levels of symptoms of anxiety, depression and hostility among police officers were not significantly higher than among comparison groups. The same pattern was found for the other SCL-90-R subscales. Conclusions We found no indications that self-reported mental health disturbances were more prevalent among police officers than among groups of employees that are not considered high-risk groups, such as employees of banks, supermarkets, psychiatric hospital and soldiers before deployment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Surg
                Int J Surg
                International Journal of Surgery (London, England)
                IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                1743-9191
                1743-9159
                25 September 2022
                October 2022
                25 September 2022
                : 106
                : 106950
                Affiliations
                [1]Consultant Psychiatrist, Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Hospital, Directorate of Health Services, Kashmir, J&K, India
                [2]Consultant Psychiatrist, RMH & NWMH, Melbourne, Australia
                [3]Faculty of Medicine, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria
                [4]Department of Psychiatry, Forensic Unit, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Plateau State, Nigeria
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author.
                Article
                S1743-9191(22)00727-0 106950
                10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106950
                9509530
                ec194ce3-e439-444a-ba7e-4ebc2949a8cf
                © 2022 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 29 August 2022
                : 22 September 2022
                Categories
                Correspondence

                Surgery
                Surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article