10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Editorial: Cancer genetics and epigenetics: theranostic targets and mechanisms

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cancer poses a threat to global health and is among the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Hence, a mechanistic understanding of cancer aimed toward developing successful interventions mandates particular focus. Being a multifactorial disease, the development and progress of cancer intercepts genetic alterations, epigenetic dysregulation, and environmental influences. These research topics highlight the growing knowledge of the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of cancer, and how it can be harnessed for successful therapeutic interventions. Cancer initiates and progresses through genetic and epigenetic alterations fostered by environmental and genetic interactions (Ocaña-Paredes et al., 2024). Most cancer-causing mutations damage the DNA sequence, i.e., genetic mutations, while others are dynamic and heritable but independent of the DNA sequence, i.e., epigenetic mutations. DNA mutations may be irreversible point mutations, chromosomal rearrangement, deletion, duplication, etc., or reversible epigenetic changes like alterations in methylation patterns and histone posttranslational modifications. Epigenetic mutations can disrupt methylation patterns and modify histones and nucleosome positioning to alter gene expression. Also, inactivating genetic mutations within the epigenome alters the epigenomic machinery (Ushijima et al., 2021). Therefore, an interplay of genomic and epigenomic circuits is the basis of cancer development and progression. Genetic mutations are hardwired resilient changes in the genome, while epigenetic modifications are softwired and more vulnerable to therapeutic intervention. The current hurdles in the diagnostic and therapeutic discoveries against cancers have necessitated a deeper mechanistic understanding of cancer at the genetic-epigenetic interface (Farhana et al., 2021). Interestingly, besides genetic underpinning, recent reports have also identified solely epigenetic mechanisms of cancer using Drosophila models. Transient disturbances in some genes can induce irreversible deregulation of cancer-associated genes, leading to tumorigenesis (Parreno et al., 2024). Furthermore, cancer-associated abnormalities mosaics have been identified in every chromatin pathway domain, spanning histones, histone effectors, chromatin remodeling machinery, transcription factors, DNA modifiers, etc. Genetic alteration of small and large magnitude perturb the healthy human epigenome and can serve as a malleable therapeutic target, thereby strengthening the impact of epigenetic modulations in driving various cancers (Gryder et al., 2022). This Research Topic encompasses an explorative review of genetic mutation leading to methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) deficiency as a target for cancer therapeutics by Fan et al. MTAP loss occurs as part of 9p21 loss and has an overall prevalence of 8% (Nilforoushan and Moatamed, 2020). Understanding the intricate and dynamic function of MTAP mutations in various cancers holds the therapeutic success of MTAP deleted tumors. The review details the molecular mechanisms and structural insights into MTAP and the potential of manipulating protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) and methionine adenosyltransferase 2A (MAT2A) as therapeutic targets in such tumors. Another outstanding work from this Research Topic by Awah et al., discovered that ERBB2+ cancers, which leads to many cancer deaths, harbors mRNA stabilizing poly U sequences on their 3′UTR. The researchers developed a novel method to synthesize unstable ERBB2 mRNA-stabilizing sequences. The engineered sequences were effective and competent against the endogenous ERBB2 mRNA-encoded sequences (Liu et al., 2021). This conclusively demonstrates the effect of sequence manipulation to degrade ERBB2 transcripts and subsequent protein loss in various cancer cell types in drug-resistant and wild-type cancers, in vitro and in vivo. The innovative approach developed by Awah et al. can be effectively expanded to other oncogenic signals to mitigate their effect, which lead to therapeutic failure. The impact of ovarian cancer on global cancer-associated mortality is daunting due to prognostic and therapeutic challenges (Liu et al., 2021). Even though numerous research efforts are directed toward ovarian cancers, the identification of significant biomarkers remains far-fetched (Yousefi et al., 2020). Chen et al., comprehensively reviewed ferroptosis as a potent marker for the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy for ovarian cancers (Li et al., 2020). Ferroptosis, a regulated cell death pathway distinct from apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy, lies at the junction of various tumors’ initiation, progression, and metastatic phases. Their work provides a knowledge base of ferroptosis, covering its genetics, mechanistic understanding, signaling pathways, clinical features, and functional significance in ovarian cancers, highlighting the prospects of ferroptosis as a biomarker and a treatment modality for ovarian cancers (Chen and Liu, 2024; Ngoi et al., 2024). Further, in a comprehensive systematic review and metanalysis, You et al. presented an overview of the association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms, C677T and A1298C, for the developmental risk of prostate cancers. The systematic review of 26 case-control studies spanning control and cases for C677T and A1298C polymorphism did not demonstrate significant risk association with MTHFR genes. Nonetheless, they identified a lower cancer risk in the Asian population harboring C677T polymorphism and an increased risk among several races in the United States harboring A1298C polymorphism. Notably, the study seeks to resolve the contradicting research outcomes underpinning the association of prostate cancer risk with MTHFR gene polymorphism, identifying that C677T and A1298C polymorphisms influence on prostate cancer risk is specific to the populations. Though the genetic and epigenetic knowledge of cancers is expansive, existing lacunae in identifying strategic genetic-epigenetic nodes are impeding the progress of the field toward advanced theranostic and socioeconomic goals. Overall, the studies in this Research Topic establish new knowledge about cancer genetics and epigenetics mechanisms, opening novel diagnostic and therapeutic fronts. The studies published in these Research Topic and other similar focused Research Topic prompt subsequent exploration of genetic and epigenetic biomarkers, mechanistic drivers of cancer, cancer classification, drug resistance mechanisms, etc. Identifying the intricate relationship between genetics and epigenetics and the modular node that skews average cellular growth and development towards cancerous phenotype can help precise diagnostic and therapeutic intervention for various cancers (Morel et al., 2020). Since cancer epigenomic orchestrates responses to therapeutic interventions, expanding our knowledge of the landscape of cancer genetic-epigenetics interface is imperative in the clinical course of precision medicine. The field has advanced to developing medications targeting epigenetic modulators, which have shown promise in treating solid tumors in preclinical and clinical trials (Kan et al., 2022). Cutting-edge epigenetic therapy offers unique insights into several cancer treatment models that identify aberrant epigenetic modifications (Davalos and Esteller, 2023). This is a significant advancement in treating malignant tumors and tailored precision diagnostics. Advancements in technology, such as artificial intelligence and sequencing techniques, along with the ongoing progress in epigenetic therapies, will create new opportunities for developing precision diagnostics and treatments. Conclusion: The Research Topic presents significant knowledge about the genetic and epigenetic nexus of cancer development and subsequent translational tracks that can be derived from this knowledge. Nevertheless, further research is warranted to draw prognostic, diagnostic, and therapeutic courses toward targeted cancer modalities and precision medicine.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Ferroptosis: past, present and future

          Ferroptosis is a new type of cell death that was discovered in recent years and is usually accompanied by a large amount of iron accumulation and lipid peroxidation during the cell death process; the occurrence of ferroptosis is iron-dependent. Ferroptosis-inducing factors can directly or indirectly affect glutathione peroxidase through different pathways, resulting in a decrease in antioxidant capacity and accumulation of lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells, ultimately leading to oxidative cell death. Recent studies have shown that ferroptosis is closely related to the pathophysiological processes of many diseases, such as tumors, nervous system diseases, ischemia-reperfusion injury, kidney injury, and blood diseases. How to intervene in the occurrence and development of related diseases by regulating cell ferroptosis has become a hotspot and focus of etiological research and treatment, but the functional changes and specific molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis still need to be further explored. This paper systematically summarizes the latest progress in ferroptosis research, with a focus on providing references for further understanding of its pathogenesis and for proposing new targets for the treatment of related diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Combining epigenetic drugs with other therapies for solid tumours — past lessons and future promise

            Epigenetic dysregulation has long been recognized as a key factor contributing to tumorigenesis and tumour maintenance that can influence all of the recognized hallmarks of cancer. Despite regulatory approvals for the treatment of certain haematological malignancies, the efficacy of the first generation of epigenetic drugs (epi-drugs) in patients with solid tumours has been disappointing; however, successes have now been achieved in selected solid tumour subtypes, thanks to the development of novel compounds and a better understanding of cancer biology that have enabled precision medicine approaches. Several lines of evidence support that, beyond their potential as monotherapies, epigenetic drugs could have important roles in synergy with other anticancer therapies or in reversing acquired therapy resistance. Herein, we review the mechanisms by which epi-drugs can modulate the sensitivity of cancer cells to other forms of anticancer therapy, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy. We provide a critical appraisal of the preclinical rationale, completed clinical studies and ongoing clinical trials relating to combination therapies incorporating epi-drugs. Finally, we propose and discuss rational clinical trial designs and drug development strategies, considering key factors including patient selection, tumour biomarker evaluation, drug scheduling and response assessment and study end points, with the aim of optimizing the development of such combinations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Crosstalk between epitranscriptomic and epigenetic mechanisms in gene regulation

              Epigenetic modifications occur on genomic DNA and histones to influence gene expression. More recently, the discovery that mRNA undergoes similar chemical modifications that powerfully impact transcript turnover and translation adds another layer of dynamic gene regulation. Central to precise and synchronized regulation of gene expression is intricate crosstalk between multiple checkpoints involved in transcript biosynthesis and processing. There are more than 100 internal modifications of RNA in mammalian cells. The most common is N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) methylation. Although m 6 A is established to influence RNA stability dynamics and translation efficiency, rapidly accumulating evidence shows significant crosstalk between RNA methylation and histone/DNA epigenetic mechanisms. These interactions specify transcriptional outputs, translation, recruitment of chromatin modifiers, as well as the deployment of the m 6 A methyltransferase complex (MTC) at target sites. In this review, we dissect m 6 A-orchestrated feedback circuits that regulate histone modifications and the activity of regulatory RNAs, such as long noncoding (lnc)RNA and chromosome-associated regulatory RNA. Collectively, this body of evidence suggests that m 6 A acts as a versatile checkpoint that can couple different layers of gene regulation with one another.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Genet
                Front Genet
                Front. Genet.
                Frontiers in Genetics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-8021
                26 July 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1446474
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences , College of Applied Medical Sciences , Jouf University , Sakaka, Aljouf Province, Saudi Arabia
                [2] 2 Department of Dermatology , Heersink School of Medicine , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, AL, United States
                [3] 3 Department of Pathology , College of Medicine , Qassim University , Buraidah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes

                Edited and reviewed by: Anton A. Buzdin, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Belgium

                *Correspondence: Aisha Farhana, afarhana@ 123456ju.edu.sa
                Article
                1446474
                10.3389/fgene.2024.1446474
                11310138
                ec136691-bcf3-460c-b8aa-5350a430ab75
                Copyright © 2024 Farhana, Yusuf and Rasheed.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 June 2024
                : 03 July 2024
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research is funded by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Jouf University through the Fast-Track Research Funding Program.
                Categories
                Genetics
                Editorial
                Custom metadata
                Cancer Genetics and Oncogenomics

                Genetics
                cancers,epigenetics,genetics,cancer theranostics,cancer mechanisms,tumor biomarkers,mutations
                Genetics
                cancers, epigenetics, genetics, cancer theranostics, cancer mechanisms, tumor biomarkers, mutations

                Comments

                Comment on this article