0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predicting subsurface stormflow response of a forested hillslope – the role of connected flow paths

      ,
      Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
      Copernicus GmbH

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Rapid flow processes in connected preferential flow paths are widely accepted to play a key role in the rainfall–runoff response at the hillslope scale, but a quantitative description of these processes is still a major challenge in hydrological research. This paper investigates the approach of incorporating preferential flow paths explicitly in a process-based model for modelling water flow and solute transport at a steep forested hillslope. We conceptualise preferential flow paths as spatially explicit structures with high conductivity and low retention capacity, and evaluate simulations with different combinations of vertical and lateral flow paths in conjunction with variable or constant soil depths against measured discharge and tracer breakthrough. <br><br> Out of 122 tested realisations, six set-ups fulfilled our selection criteria for the water flow simulation. These set-ups successfully simulated infiltration, vertical and lateral subsurface flow in structures, and allowed predicting the magnitude, dynamics and water balance of the hydrological response of the hillslope during successive periods of steady-state sprinkling on selected plots and intermittent rainfall on the entire hillslope area. The number of equifinal model set-ups was further reduced by the results of solute transport simulations. Two of the six acceptable model set-ups matched the shape of the observed breakthrough curve well, indicating that macrodispersion induced by preferential flow was captured well by the topology of the preferential flow network. <br><br> The configurations of successful model set-ups suggest that preferential flow related to connected vertical and lateral flow paths is a first-order control on the hydrology of the study hillslope, whereas spatial variability of soil depth is secondary especially when lateral flow paths are present. Virtual experiments for investigating hillslope controls on subsurface processes should thus consider the effect of distinctive flow paths within the soil mantle. The explicit representation of flow paths in a hydrological process model was found to be a suitable approach for this purpose.</p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
                Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
                Copernicus GmbH
                1607-7938
                2014
                January 13 2014
                : 18
                : 1
                : 121-138
                Article
                10.5194/hess-18-121-2014
                ebc00507-6d28-4007-921a-d39dc7611687
                © 2014

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article