Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Emergency department clinical leads’ experiences of implementing primary care services where GPs work in or alongside emergency departments in the UK: a qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To manage increasing demand for emergency and unscheduled care NHS England policy has promoted services in which patients presenting to Emergency Departments (EDs) with non-urgent problems are directed to general practitioners (GPs) and other primary care clinicians working within or alongside emergency departments. However, the ways that hospitals have implemented primary care services in EDs are varied. The aim of this study was to describe ED clinical leads’ experiences of implementing and delivering ‘primary care services’ and ‘emergency medicine services’ where GPs were integrated into the ED team.

          Methods

          We conducted interviews with ED clinical leads in England ( n = 19) and Wales ( n = 2). We used framework analysis to analyse interview transcripts and explore differences across ‘primary care services’, ‘emergency medicine services’ and emergency departments without primary care services.

          Results

          In EDs with separate primary care services, success was reported when having a distinct workforce of primary care clinicians, who improved waiting times and flow by seeing primary care-type patients in a timely way, using fewer investigations, and enabling ED doctors to focus on more acutely unwell patients. Some challenges were: trying to align their service with the policy guidance, inconsistent demand for primary care, accessible community primary care services, difficulties in recruiting GPs, lack of funding, difficulties in agreeing governance protocols and establishing effective streaming pathways. Where GPs were integrated into an ED workforce success was reported as managing the demand for both emergency and primary care and reducing admissions.

          Conclusions

          Introducing a policy advocating a preferred model of service to address primary care demand was not useful for all emergency departments. To support successful and sustainable primary care services in or alongside EDs, policy makers and commissioners should consider varied ways that GPs can be employed to manage variation in local demand and also local contextual factors such as the ability to recruit and retain GPs, sustainable funding, clear governance frameworks, training, support and guidance for all staff. Whether or not streaming to a separate primary care service is useful also depended on the level of primary care demand.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Use of out of hours services: a comparison between two organisations.

          To investigate differences in numbers and characteristics of patients using primary or emergency care because of differences in organisation of out of hours care. Increasing numbers of self referrals at the accident and emergency (A&E) department cause overcrowding, while a substantial number of these patients exhibit minor injuries that can be treated by a general practitioner (GP). Two different organisations of out of hours care in two Dutch cities (Heerlen and Maastricht) were investigated. Important differences between the two organisations are the accessibility and the location of primary care facility (GP cooperative). The Heerlen GP cooperative is situated in the centre of the city and is respectively 5 km and 9 km away from the two A&E departments situated in the area of Heerlen. This GP cooperative can only be visited by appointment. The Maastricht GP cooperative has free access and is located within the local A&E department. During a three week period all registration forms of patient contacts with out of hours care (GP cooperative and A&E department) were collected and with respect to the primary care patients a random sample of one third was analysed. For the Heerlen and Maastricht GP cooperative the annual contact rate, as extrapolated from our data, per 1000 inhabitants per year is 238 and 279 respectively (chi(2)((1df))=4.385, p=0.036). The contact rate at the A&E departments of Heerlen (n=66) and Maastricht (n=52) is not different (chi(2)((1df))=1.765, p=0.184). Some 51.7% of the patients attending the A&E department in Heerlen during out of hours were self referred, compared with 15.9% in Maastricht (chi(2)((1df))=203.13, p<0.001). The organisation of out of hours care in Maastricht has optimised the GP's gatekeeper function and thereby led to fewer self referrals at the A&E department, compared with Heerlen.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Primary care services located with EDs: a review of effectiveness

            Primary care focused unscheduled care centres (UCC) co-located with major EDs have been proposed as a solution to the rise in ED attendances. They aim to reduce the burden of primary care patients attending the ED, hence reducing crowding, waits and cost.This review analysed available literature in the context of the impact of general practitioner (GP) delivered, hospital-based (adjacent or within the ED) unscheduled care services on process outcomes, cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The impact of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a rapid realist review

              Objectives Worldwide, emergency healthcare systems are under intense pressure from ever-increasing demand and evidence is urgently needed to understand how this can be safely managed. An estimated 10%–43% of emergency department patients could be treated by primary care services. In England, this has led to a policy proposal and £100 million of funding (US$130 million), for emergency departments to stream appropriate patients to a co-located primary care facility so they are ‘free to care for the sickest patients’. However, the research evidence to support this initiative is weak. Design Rapid realist literature review. Setting Emergency departments. Inclusion criteria Articles describing general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments. Aim To develop context-specific theories that explain how and why general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments affect: patient flow; patient experience; patient safety and the wider healthcare system. Results Ninety-six articles contributed data to theory development sourced from earlier systematic reviews, updated database searches (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane DSR & CRCT, DARE, HTA Database, BSC, PsycINFO and SCOPUS) and citation tracking. We developed theories to explain: how staff interpret the streaming system; different roles general practitioners adopt in the emergency department setting (traditional, extended, gatekeeper or emergency clinician) and how these factors influence patient (experience and safety) and organisational (demand and cost-effectiveness) outcomes. Conclusions Multiple factors influence the effectiveness of emergency department streaming to general practitioners; caution is needed in embedding the policy until further research and evaluation are available. Service models that encourage the traditional general practitioner approach may have shorter process times for non-urgent patients; however, there is little evidence that this frees up emergency department staff to care for the sickest patients. Distinct primary care services offering increased patient choice may result in provider-induced demand. Economic evaluation and safety requires further research. PROSPERO registration number CRD42017069741.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Edwardsm28@cardiff.ac.uk
                CooperA8@cardiff.ac.uk
                DaviesF9@cardiff.ac.uk
                SherlockR2@cardiff.ac.uk
                Carson-StevensAP@cardiff.ac.uk
                PriceD15@cardiff.ac.uk
                a.m.porter@swansea.ac.uk
                b.a.evans@swansea.ac.uk
                M.S.Islam@Swansea.ac.uk
                h.a.snooks@swansea.ac.uk
                p.anderson@swansea.ac.uk
                nsiriwardena@lincoln.ac.uk
                peter.hibbert@mq.edu.au
                tom.hughes@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
                M.W.Cooke@warwick.ac.uk
                jeremy.dale@warwick.ac.uk
                EdwardsAG@cardiff.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Emerg Med
                BMC Emerg Med
                BMC Emergency Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-227X
                14 August 2020
                14 August 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 62
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5600.3, ISNI 0000 0001 0807 5670, Division of Population Medicine, , Cardiff University, ; Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.4827.9, ISNI 0000 0001 0658 8800, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, ; Swansea, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.4827.9, ISNI 0000 0001 0658 8800, Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, , Swansea University, ; Swansea, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.36511.30, ISNI 0000 0004 0420 4262, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Health & Social Care, , University of Lincoln, ; Lincoln, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.1004.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2158 5405, Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, , Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, ; Macquarie Park, Australia
                [6 ]GRID grid.8348.7, ISNI 0000 0001 2306 7492, Emergency Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, ; Oxford, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.7372.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8809 1613, Warwick Medical School, , University of Warwick, ; Coventry, UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.7372.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8809 1613, Academic Primary Care, , Warwick University, ; Coventry, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-2828
                Article
                358
                10.1186/s12873-020-00358-3
                7429882
                32799820
                ebbd6cb4-841c-4355-b41d-f0a4c21ba429
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 4 February 2020
                : 6 August 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002001, Health Services and Delivery Research Programme;
                Award ID: 15/145/04
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                emergency care,urgent care,general practitioners
                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                emergency care, urgent care, general practitioners

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content144

                Cited by9

                Most referenced authors141