55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Smartphone use is a risk factor for pediatric dry eye disease according to region and age: a case control study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In 2014, the overall rate of smartphone use in Korea was 83 and 89.8 % in children and adolescents. The rate of smartphone use differs according to region (urban vs. rural) and age (younger grade vs. older grade). We investigated risk and protective factors associated with pediatric dry eye disease (DED) in relation to smartphone use rate according to region and age.

          Methods

          We enrolled 916 children and performed an ocular exam that included slit lamp exam and tear break-up time. A questionnaire administered to children and their families consisted of video display terminal (VDT) use, outdoor activity, learning, and modified ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score. DED was defined based on the International Dry Eye Workshop guidelines (Objective signs: punctate epithelial erosion or short tear break-up time; subjective symptoms: modified OSDI score) We performed statistical analysis of risk factors and protective factors in children divided into groups as follows: DED vs. control, urban vs. rural, younger grade (1st to 3rd) vs. older grade (4th to 6th).

          Results

          A total of 6.6 % of children were included in the DED group, and 8.3 % of children in the urban group were diagnosed with DED compared to 2.8 % in the rural group ( P = 0.03). The rate of smartphone use was 61.3 % in the urban group and 51.0 % in the rural group ( P = 0.04). In total, 9.1 % of children in the older-grade group were diagnosed with DED compared to 4 % in the younger-grade group ( P = 0.03). The rate of smartphone use was 65.1 % in older-grade children and 50.9 % in younger-grade children ( P < 0.001). The mean daily duration of smartphone use was longer in the DED group than controls (logistic regression analysis, P < 0.001, OR = 13.07), and the mean daily duration of outdoor activities was shorter in the DED group than controls (logistic regression analysis, P < 0.01, OR = 0.33). After cessation of smartphone use for 4 weeks in the DED group, both subjective symptoms and objective signs had improved.

          Conclusions

          Smartphone use in children was strongly associated with pediatric DED; however, outdoor activity appeared to be protective against pediatric DED. Older-grade students in urban environments had DED risk factors (long duration of smartphone use), and a short duration of outdoor activity time. Therefore, close observation and caution are needed when older children in urban areas use smartphones.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0364-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne, Australia.

          To describe the epidemiology of dry eye in the adult population of Melbourne, Australia. A cross-sectional prevalence study. Participants were recruited by a household census from two of nine clusters of the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project, a population-based study of age-related eye disease in the 40 and older age group of Melbourne, Australia. Nine hundred and twenty-six (82.3% of eligible) people participated; 433 (46.8%) were male. They ranged in age from 40 to 97 years, with a mean of 59.2 years. Self-reported symptoms of dry eye were elicited by an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Four objective assessments of dry eye were made: Schirmer's test, tear film breakup time, rose bengal staining, and fluorescein corneal staining. A standardized clinical slit-lamp examination was performed on all participants. Dry eye for the individual signs or symptoms was defined as: rose bengal > 3, Schirmers 1/3 fluorescein staining, and severe symptoms (3 on a scale of 0 to 3). Dry eye was diagnosed as follows: 10.8% by rose bengal, 16.3% by Schirmer's test, 8.6% by tear film breakup time, 1.5% by fluorescein staining, 7.4% with two or more signs, and 5.5% with any severe symptom not attributed to hay fever. Women were more likely to report severe symptoms of dry eye (odds ratio [OR] = 1.85; 95% confidence limits [CL] = 1.01, 3.41). Risk factors for two or more signs of dry eye include age (OR = 1.04; 95% CL = 1.01, 1.06), and self-report of arthritis (OR = 3.27; 95% CL = 1.74, 6.17). These results were not changed after excluding the 21 people (2.27%) who wore contact lenses. These are the first reported population-based data of dry eye in Australia. The prevalence of dry eye varies by sign and symptom.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dry eye with only decreased tear break-up time is sometimes associated with allergic conjunctivitis.

            The authors' clinical experience has suggested that there is a form of dry eye with only decreased tear break-up time, which is associated with allergic conjunctivitis. The current study was performed to verify this hypothesis. The authors recruited patients with two types of dry eye syndrome, those with only decreased tear break-up (BUT type) and those with positive vital staining (staining type). Individuals without any symptoms or signs served as controls. All subjects were compared regarding symptoms, Schirmer and tear clearance test results, conjunctival papillary formation, antigen-specific serum-IgE level (s-IgE), and goblet cell density of the palpebral conjunctiva. Antigen-induced allergic conjunctivitis was produced in guinea pigs, and histopathologic changes of the conjunctiva were examined. Patients with the BUT-type dry eye syndrome were younger and their symptoms were as severe as the staining type. The Schirmer and tear clearance test results were better, and the papillary formation and s-IgE were observed more than in the BUT type. The average goblet cell density in the BUT-type syndrome was 625.4 +/- 193.2/mm2, which was significantly less than 1005.6 +/- 294.5/mm2 in the controls (P < 0.01). The average goblet cell density was significantly decreased in the allergic animals (10.40 +/- 1.11/0.2 mm) compared with that of the controls (16.21 +/- 0.26/0.2 mm) or the anti-allergic drug-treated group (13.69 +/- 0.30/0.2 mm) (P < 0.01). These results support the authors' hypothesis that decreased break-up time is in part associated with the decreased goblet cell density caused by allergic conjunctivitis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association between video display terminal use and dry eye disease in school children.

              To evaluate the risk factors of dry eye disease in school children associated with video display terminal use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hyung1984@hanmail.net
                kkanssa@hanmail.net
                82-2-6299-1665 , njmoon@chol.com
                Journal
                BMC Ophthalmol
                BMC Ophthalmol
                BMC Ophthalmology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2415
                28 October 2016
                28 October 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 188
                Affiliations
                Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Chung Ang University Hospital, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 06973 Korea
                Article
                364
                10.1186/s12886-016-0364-4
                5084437
                27788672
                eb28b081-d7a5-419b-ad9f-d2aab55e0ca8
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 23 March 2016
                : 14 October 2016
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                dry eye disease,pediatrics,smartphone,outdoor activity,video display terminal

                Comments

                Comment on this article