15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Researching with Qualitative Methodologies in the Time of Coronavirus: Clues and Challenges

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In late 2020 and the first semester of 2021, in Santiago de Chile, five women researchers who work with qualitative methodologies, based on their reflections on how the context of the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted on their doctoral research or their role as thesis advisors, conducted a reflective exploration of the conditions and challenges for qualitative research amid a global crisis. In this context, they convene once per week to explore how other researchers conduct and document their research processes, based on a purposive and thorough bibliographic exploration of qualitative studies on the pandemic and remote methods published in qualitative research journals. During these meetings, they reflect on and analyze the impacts and challenges of research in today’s world, identifying possibilities and challenges in the methodological and ethical domains. Thus, they organize the present paper around two axes: one on the effects of the pandemic on academic and research practices, in general terms, and another on the specific methodological challenges facing qualitative research during the pandemic. These challenges are largely caused by difficulties in accessing and recruiting participants; the conditions of participation, influenced by vulnerabilities or barriers that constitute factors of inequality; the data production strategies and methodologies used in virtual contexts; ethical considerations; and the effects of the pandemic context on quality and rigor criteria. The article concludes with reflections and questions on the meanings, underlying logic, and practices of qualitative research, which are interrogated and re-signified in light of the COVID-19 pandemic while also illuminating research in post-pandemic settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population

          Summary Background The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on population mental health is of increasing global concern. We examine changes in adult mental health in the UK population before and during the lockdown. Methods In this secondary analysis of a national, longitudinal cohort study, households that took part in Waves 8 or 9 of the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) panel, including all members aged 16 or older in April, 2020, were invited to complete the COVID-19 web survey on April 23–30, 2020. Participants who were unable to make an informed decision as a result of incapacity, or who had unknown postal addresses or addresses abroad were excluded. Mental health was assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Repeated cross-sectional analyses were done to examine temporal trends. Fixed-effects regression models were fitted to identify within-person change compared with preceding trends. Findings Waves 6–9 of the UKHLS had 53 351 participants. Eligible participants for the COVID-19 web survey were from households that took part in Waves 8 or 9, and 17 452 (41·2%) of 42 330 eligible people participated in the web survey. Population prevalence of clinically significant levels of mental distress rose from 18·9% (95% CI 17·8–20·0) in 2018–19 to 27·3% (26·3–28·2) in April, 2020, one month into UK lockdown. Mean GHQ-12 score also increased over this time, from 11·5 (95% CI 11·3–11·6) in 2018–19, to 12·6 (12·5–12·8) in April, 2020. This was 0·48 (95% CI 0·07–0·90) points higher than expected when accounting for previous upward trends between 2014 and 2018. Comparing GHQ-12 scores within individuals, adjusting for time trends and significant predictors of change, increases were greatest in 18–24-year-olds (2·69 points, 95% CI 1·89–3·48), 25–34-year-olds (1·57, 0·96–2·18), women (0·92, 0·50–1·35), and people living with young children (1·45, 0·79–2·12). People employed before the pandemic also averaged a notable increase in GHQ-12 score (0·63, 95% CI 0·20–1·06). Interpretation By late April, 2020, mental health in the UK had deteriorated compared with pre-COVID-19 trends. Policies emphasising the needs of women, young people, and those with preschool aged children are likely to play an important part in preventing future mental illness. Funding None.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Qualitative Quality: Eight "Big-Tent" Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Now I see it, now I don't: researcher's position and reflexivity in qualitative research

              M R Berger (2015)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Qual Methods
                Int J Qual Methods
                spijq
                IJQ
                International Journal of Qualitative Methods
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                1609-4069
                3 January 2023
                Jan-Dec 2023
                3 January 2023
                : 22
                : 16094069221150110
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Ringgold 28033, universityPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; , Santiago, Chile
                Author notes
                [*]Marcela Cornejo, Department of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile. Email: marcela@ 123456uc.cl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9805-8889
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6018-7255
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5703-4103
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-023X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1217-8351
                Article
                10.1177_16094069221150110
                10.1177/16094069221150110
                9816627
                36628132
                eac7f7f3-c1bc-417c-b7e4-135374d54775
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Center of Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies, COES;
                Award ID: CONICYT/FONDAP/15130009
                Funded by: Millennium Institute for Research on Violence and Democracy, VIODEMOS;
                Award ID: ANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - ICS
                Funded by: ANID National Doctoral Scholarship;
                Award ID: 21170739, 21190814, 21200494, 21200465
                Categories
                Regular Article
                Custom metadata
                ts10
                January-December 2023

                covid-19 pandemic,remote research methods,ethical implications,quality and rigor,collective autoethnography,challenges facing qualitative research

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                21
                0
                19
                0
                Smart Citations
                21
                0
                19
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content87

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors482