0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical and NGS predictors of response to regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 1 , 3 , 2 , 2 , 2 , , 1 , 2
      Scientific Reports
      Nature Publishing Group UK
      Genomic analysis, High-throughput screening, Cancer genomics, Cancer therapy, CNS cancer, Cancer genomics, Clinical genetics, Gene regulation, Genomics, Sequencing, Gliogenesis, Biological techniques, Biotechnology, Cancer, Genetics, Molecular biology, Neuroscience, Biomarkers, Predictive markers, Prognostic markers, Oncology, Cancer, Surgical oncology

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Predictive factors for response to regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma, IDH- wildtype, are scarcely recognized. The objective of this study was to identify molecular predictive factors for response to regorafenib using a clinically available platform. We analyzed a prospective cohort of 30 patients harboring recurrent glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, and treated with regorafenib. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was performed on DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tissues using a clinically available platform. Moreover, MGMT methylation and EGFRvIII expression analyses were performed. Six-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 30% and median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months, in line with literature data. NGS analysis revealed a mutation in the EGFR pathway in 18% of cases and a mutation in the mitogen-activated protein-kinase (MAPK) pathway in 18% of cases. In the remaining cases, no mutations were detected. Patients carrying MAPK pathway mutation had a poor response to regorafenib treatment, with a significantly shorter PFS and a nonsignificantly shorter OS compared to EGFR-mutated patients (for PFS, 2.5 vs 4.5 months, p = 0.0061; for OS, 7 vs 9 months, p = 0.1076). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MAPK pathway mutations independently predicted a shorter PFS after regorafenib treatment ( p = 0.0188). The negative prognostic role of MAPK pathway alteration was reinforced when we combined EGFR-mutated with EGFRvIII-positive cases. Recurrent glioblastoma tumors with an alteration in MAPK pathway could belong to the mesenchymal subtype and respond poorly to regorafenib treatment, while EGFR-altered cases have a better response to regorafenib. We thus provide a molecular selection criterion easy to implement in the clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

          The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System is both a conceptual and practical advance over its 2007 predecessor. For the first time, the WHO classification of CNS tumors uses molecular parameters in addition to histology to define many tumor entities, thus formulating a concept for how CNS tumor diagnoses should be structured in the molecular era. As such, the 2016 CNS WHO presents major restructuring of the diffuse gliomas, medulloblastomas and other embryonal tumors, and incorporates new entities that are defined by both histology and molecular features, including glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype and glioblastoma, IDH-mutant; diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant; RELA fusion-positive ependymoma; medulloblastoma, WNT-activated and medulloblastoma, SHH-activated; and embryonal tumour with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered. The 2016 edition has added newly recognized neoplasms, and has deleted some entities, variants and patterns that no longer have diagnostic and/or biological relevance. Other notable changes include the addition of brain invasion as a criterion for atypical meningioma and the introduction of a soft tissue-type grading system for the now combined entity of solitary fibrous tumor / hemangiopericytoma-a departure from the manner by which other CNS tumors are graded. Overall, it is hoped that the 2016 CNS WHO will facilitate clinical, experimental and epidemiological studies that will lead to improvements in the lives of patients with brain tumors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma

            Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, is usually rapidly fatal. The current standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is surgical resection to the extent feasible, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. In this trial we compared radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy plus temozolomide, given concomitantly with and after radiotherapy, in terms of efficacy and safety. Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed glioblastoma were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (fractionated focal irradiation in daily fractions of 2 Gy given 5 days per week for 6 weeks, for a total of 60 Gy) or radiotherapy plus continuous daily temozolomide (75 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day, 7 days per week from the first to the last day of radiotherapy), followed by six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (150 to 200 mg per square meter for 5 days during each 28-day cycle). The primary end point was overall survival. A total of 573 patients from 85 centers underwent randomization. The median age was 56 years, and 84 percent of patients had undergone debulking surgery. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the median survival was 14.6 months with radiotherapy plus temozolomide and 12.1 months with radiotherapy alone. The unadjusted hazard ratio for death in the radiotherapy-plus-temozolomide group was 0.63 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.75; P<0.001 by the log-rank test). The two-year survival rate was 26.5 percent with radiotherapy plus temozolomide and 10.4 percent with radiotherapy alone. Concomitant treatment with radiotherapy plus temozolomide resulted in grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects in 7 percent of patients. The addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma resulted in a clinically meaningful and statistically significant survival benefit with minimal additional toxicity. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma.

              We describe the landscape of somatic genomic alterations based on multidimensional and comprehensive characterization of more than 500 glioblastoma tumors (GBMs). We identify several novel mutated genes as well as complex rearrangements of signature receptors, including EGFR and PDGFRA. TERT promoter mutations are shown to correlate with elevated mRNA expression, supporting a role in telomerase reactivation. Correlative analyses confirm that the survival advantage of the proneural subtype is conferred by the G-CIMP phenotype, and MGMT DNA methylation may be a predictive biomarker for treatment response only in classical subtype GBM. Integrative analysis of genomic and proteomic profiles challenges the notion of therapeutic inhibition of a pathway as an alternative to inhibition of the target itself. These data will facilitate the discovery of therapeutic and diagnostic target candidates, the validation of research and clinical observations and the generation of unanticipated hypotheses that can advance our molecular understanding of this lethal cancer. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                roberto.pallini@unicatt.it
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                28 September 2022
                28 September 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 16265
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.8142.f, ISNI 0000 0001 0941 3192, Department of Radiation Oncology, , Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, ; Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.8142.f, ISNI 0000 0001 0941 3192, Department of Neurosurgery, , Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, ; Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.8142.f, ISNI 0000 0001 0941 3192, Depatrment of Pathology, , Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, ; Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
                [4 ]GRID grid.8142.f, ISNI 0000 0001 0941 3192, Department of Radiology, , Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, ; Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4611-8827
                Article
                20417
                10.1038/s41598-022-20417-y
                9519741
                36171338
                eac34005-8925-4444-ae34-0f10ab56af18
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 4 April 2022
                : 13 September 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
                Award ID: IG 2019 23154
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Uncategorized
                genomic analysis,high-throughput screening,cancer genomics,cancer therapy,cns cancer,clinical genetics,gene regulation,genomics,sequencing,gliogenesis,biological techniques,biotechnology,cancer,genetics,molecular biology,neuroscience,biomarkers,predictive markers,prognostic markers,oncology,surgical oncology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content634

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors886