For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
2
views
44
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      1,459
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      COVID Stress Scales (CSS): evidências psicométricas no contexto brasileiro Translated title: COVID Stress Scales (CSS): psychometric evidence in the brazilian Context

      research-article

      Read this article at

      SciELO
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumo Objetivo. Adaptar a COVID Stress Scales (CSS), reunindo evidências psicométricas, e verificar o padrão de relação com ansiedade frente a COVID-19. Método. Foram realizados dois estudos com participantes de diferentes estados brasileiros. No primeiro (n = 423) a análise fatorial exploratória sugeriu uma estrutura pentafatorial. No segundo (n = 300) executou-se uma análise fatorial confirmatória testando modelo pentafatorial. Resultado. Reuniram-se evidências de validade convergente e discriminante. A correlação de Pearson (r) que evidenciou relações positivas e estatisticamente significativas entre ansiedade e o estresse frente a COVID, indicando validade baseada em medida externa. Ademais, constatou-se consistência interna satisfatória em ambos os estudos. Conclui-se que o CSS é válida e fidedigna, podendo auxiliar na avaliação de indivíduos com estresse ocasionado pela pandemia da COVID e seus correlatos.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract Objective. Adapt the COVID Stress Scales (CSS), gathering psychometric evidence, and to verify the pattern of relationship with anxiety compared to COVID-19. Method. Two studies were carried out with participants from different Brazilian states. In the first (n = 423) the exploratory factor analysis suggested a pentafactorial structure. In the second (n = 300), a confirmatory factor analysis was performed, testing a pentafactorial model. Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was gathered. Pearson's correlation (r) was performed, which showed positive and statistically significant relationships between anxiety and stress in the face of COVID, indicating validity based on external measure. Results. Satisfactory internal consistency was found in both studies. It is concluded that the CSS is valid and reliable and can assist in the assessment of individuals with stress caused by the COVID pandemic and its correlated factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

          Chaolin Huang, Yeming Wang, Xingwang Li … (2020)
          Summary Background A recent cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China, was caused by a novel betacoronavirus, the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). We report the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and treatment and clinical outcomes of these patients. Methods All patients with suspected 2019-nCoV were admitted to a designated hospital in Wuhan. We prospectively collected and analysed data on patients with laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing. Data were obtained with standardised data collection forms shared by WHO and the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium from electronic medical records. Researchers also directly communicated with patients or their families to ascertain epidemiological and symptom data. Outcomes were also compared between patients who had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and those who had not. Findings By Jan 2, 2020, 41 admitted hospital patients had been identified as having laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection. Most of the infected patients were men (30 [73%] of 41); less than half had underlying diseases (13 [32%]), including diabetes (eight [20%]), hypertension (six [15%]), and cardiovascular disease (six [15%]). Median age was 49·0 years (IQR 41·0–58·0). 27 (66%) of 41 patients had been exposed to Huanan seafood market. One family cluster was found. Common symptoms at onset of illness were fever (40 [98%] of 41 patients), cough (31 [76%]), and myalgia or fatigue (18 [44%]); less common symptoms were sputum production (11 [28%] of 39), headache (three [8%] of 38), haemoptysis (two [5%] of 39), and diarrhoea (one [3%] of 38). Dyspnoea developed in 22 (55%) of 40 patients (median time from illness onset to dyspnoea 8·0 days [IQR 5·0–13·0]). 26 (63%) of 41 patients had lymphopenia. All 41 patients had pneumonia with abnormal findings on chest CT. Complications included acute respiratory distress syndrome (12 [29%]), RNAaemia (six [15%]), acute cardiac injury (five [12%]) and secondary infection (four [10%]). 13 (32%) patients were admitted to an ICU and six (15%) died. Compared with non-ICU patients, ICU patients had higher plasma levels of IL2, IL7, IL10, GSCF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα. Interpretation The 2019-nCoV infection caused clusters of severe respiratory illness similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and was associated with ICU admission and high mortality. Major gaps in our knowledge of the origin, epidemiology, duration of human transmission, and clinical spectrum of disease need fulfilment by future studies. Funding Ministry of Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission.
          Article 0 comments Cited 22182 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China

            Cuiyan Wang, Riyu Pan, Xiaoyang Wan … (2020)
            Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
            Article 0 comments Cited 4089 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Global Measure of Perceived Stress

              Sheldon Cohen, Tom Kamarck, Robin Mermelstein (1983)
              Article 0 comments Cited 3804 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (publisher-id): ap
                Title: Actualidades en Psicología
                Abbreviated Title: Act.Psi
                Publisher: Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas, Universidad de Costa Rica (José, San Pedro Montes de Oca, San José, San Pedro Montes de Oca, Costa Rica )
                ISSN (Print): 0258-6444
                ISSN (Electronic): 2215-3535
                Publication date (Print and electronic): December 2022
                Volume: 36
                Issue: 133
                Pages: 73-86
                Affiliations
                [1] orgnameUniversidade Federal da Paraíba orgdiv1Departamento de Pós-graduação em Psicologia Brazil rislaybrito@ 123456gmail.com
                [3] orgnameUniversidade Federal da Paraíba orgdiv1Departamento de Pós-graduação em Psicologia Social Brazil silvapgn@ 123456gmail.com
                [2] orgnameUniversidade Federal da Paraíba orgdiv1Departamento de Pós-graduação em Psicologia Brazil sandraelisa.freire@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                Publisher ID: S2215-35352022000200073 Publisher ID: S2215-3535(22)03613300073
                DOI: 10.15517/ap.v36i133.43688
                SO-VID: eac2b0f3-0597-4679-a92c-ad0a9cbee3a8
                License:

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 International License.

                History
                Date received : 01 September 2020
                Date accepted : 15 September 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 44, Pages: 14
                Product

                SciELO Costa Rica


                Keywords: validade,Estresse,COVID-19,adaptação,consistência interna,Stress,adaptation,validity,internal consistency
                Data availability:
                Keywords: validade, Estresse, COVID-19, adaptação, consistência interna, Stress, adaptation, validity, internal consistency

                Comments

                Comment on this article