4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Digital Biomarker Representing Frailty Phenotypes: The Use of Machine Learning and Sensor-Based Sit-to-Stand Test

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since conventional screening tools for assessing frailty phenotypes are resource intensive and unsuitable for routine application, efforts are underway to simplify and shorten the frailty screening protocol by using sensor-based technologies. This study explores whether machine learning combined with frailty modeling could determine the least sensor-derived features required to identify physical frailty and three key frailty phenotypes (slowness, weakness, and exhaustion). Older participants (n = 102, age = 76.54 ± 7.72 years) were fitted with five wearable sensors and completed a five times sit-to-stand test. Seventeen sensor-derived features were extracted and used for optimal feature selection based on a machine learning technique combined with frailty modeling. Mean of hip angular velocity range (indicator of slowness), mean of vertical power range (indicator of weakness), and coefficient of variation of vertical power range (indicator of exhaustion) were selected as the optimal features. A frailty model with the three optimal features had an area under the curve of 85.20%, a sensitivity of 82.70%, and a specificity of 71.09%. This study suggests that the three sensor-derived features could be used as digital biomarkers of physical frailty and phenotypes of slowness, weakness, and exhaustion. Our findings could facilitate future design of low-cost sensor-based technologies for remote physical frailty assessments via telemedicine.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Frailty in elderly people

            Frailty is the most problematic expression of population ageing. It is a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homoeostasis after a stressor event and is a consequence of cumulative decline in many physiological systems during a lifetime. This cumulative decline depletes homoeostatic reserves until minor stressor events trigger disproportionate changes in health status. In landmark studies, investigators have developed valid models of frailty and these models have allowed epidemiological investigations that show the association between frailty and adverse health outcomes. We need to develop more efficient methods to detect frailty and measure its severity in routine clinical practice, especially methods that are useful for primary care. Such progress would greatly inform the appropriate selection of elderly people for invasive procedures or drug treatments and would be the basis for a shift in the care of frail elderly people towards more appropriate goal-directed care. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.

              There is no single generally accepted clinical definition of frailty. Previously developed tools to assess frailty that have been shown to be predictive of death or need for entry into an institutional facility have not gained acceptance among practising clinicians. We aimed to develop a tool that would be both predictive and easy to use. We developed the 7-point Clinical Frailty Scale and applied it and other established tools that measure frailty to 2305 elderly patients who participated in the second stage of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA). We followed this cohort prospectively; after 5 years, we determined the ability of the Clinical Frailty Scale to predict death or need for institutional care, and correlated the results with those obtained from other established tools. The CSHA Clinical Frailty Scale was highly correlated (r = 0.80) with the Frailty Index. Each 1-category increment of our scale significantly increased the medium-term risks of death (21.2% within about 70 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.5%-30.6%) and entry into an institution (23.9%, 95% CI 8.8%-41.2%) in multivariable models that adjusted for age, sex and education. Analyses of receiver operating characteristic curves showed that our Clinical Frailty Scale performed better than measures of cognition, function or comorbidity in assessing risk for death (area under the curve 0.77 for 18-month and 0.70 for 70-month mortality). Frailty is a valid and clinically important construct that is recognizable by physicians. Clinical judgments about frailty can yield useful predictive information.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                sensors
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                08 May 2021
                May 2021
                : 21
                : 9
                : 3258
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Interdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; catherine.park@ 123456bcm.edu (C.P.); ram.mishra@ 123456bcm.edu (R.M.)
                [2 ]Telehealth Cardio-Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program, Medical Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; amirs@ 123456bcm.edu (A.S.); msbryant@ 123456bcm.edu (M.S.B.); christina.nguyen@ 123456va.gov (C.N.); ilse.torresruiz@ 123456bcm.edu (I.T.)
                [3 ]VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Houston, TX 77021, USA; anaik@ 123456bcm.edu
                [4 ]VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (a Virtual Center), Houston, TX 77021, USA
                [5 ]Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: bijan.najafi@ 123456bcm.edu ; Tel.: +1-713-798-7536
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9441-683X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0320-8101
                Article
                sensors-21-03258
                10.3390/s21093258
                8125840
                34066716
                ea9bc7ae-7e68-4d34-a8cc-66da74849bb0
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 March 2021
                : 05 May 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                physical frailty,frailty phenotype,machine learning,digital health,sit-to-stand test,wearable technology,older adults,remote assessment,telemedicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article