30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Examining the role of psychological factors in the relationship between sleep problems and suicide

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We sought to conduct the first systematic review of empirical evidence investigating the role of psychological factors in the relationship between sleep problems and suicidal thoughts and behaviours. Twelve studies were identified which examined psychological factors grouped into four categories of cognitive appraisals, psychosocial factors, emotion regulation strategies, and risk behaviours. Although there was substantial heterogeneity across studies with respect to measurement, sampling, and analysis, preliminary evidence indicated that negative cognitive appraisals, perceived social isolation, and unhelpful emotion regulation strategies may contribute to the association between sleep problems and suicidal thoughts and behaviours. Given that findings in this area are currently restricted to studies with cross-sectional designs, the directionality of the interrelationships between these psychological factors, sleep problems and suicidality, remains unclear. We integrate the findings of our review with contemporary psychological models of suicidal behaviour to develop a clear research agenda. Identified pathways should now be tested with longitudinal and experimental designs. In addition, a more thorough investigation of the complexities of sleep, psychological factors, and suicidal thoughts and behaviours is crucial for the development of targeted psychological interventions.

          Highlights

          • Systematic review of the role of psychological factors in sleep/suicide relationships

          • Review findings integrated with suicide theory to define a clear research agenda.

          • Reliance on cross-sectional designs limits interpretation of directionality of pathways.

          • Identified pathways should be investigated with longitudinal and experimental designs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples.

          Past suicidal behaviors including ideation and attempts have been identified as significant risk factors for subsequent suicidal behavior. However, inadequate attention has been given to the development or validation of measures of past suicidal behavior. The present study examined the reliability and validity of a brief self-report measure of past suicidal behavior, the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R). Participants included psychiatric inpatient adolescents, high school students, psychiatric inpatient adults, and undergraduates. Logistic regression analyses provided empirical support for the usefulness of the SBQ-R as a risk measure of suicide to differentiate between suicide-risk and nonsuicidal study participants. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicated that the most useful cutoff scores on the SBQ-R were 7 for nonsuicidal samples, and 8 for clinical samples. Both the single SBQ-R Item 1 and SBQ-R total scores are recommended for use in clinical and nonclinical settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sleep and mental disorders: A meta-analysis of polysomnographic research.

              Investigating sleep in mental disorders has the potential to reveal both disorder-specific and transdiagnostic psychophysiological mechanisms. This meta-analysis aimed at determining the polysomnographic (PSG) characteristics of several mental disorders. Relevant studies were searched through standard strategies. Controlled PSG studies evaluating sleep in affective, anxiety, eating, pervasive developmental, borderline and antisocial personality disorders, attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and schizophrenia were included. PSG variables of sleep continuity, depth, and architecture, as well as rapid-eye movement (REM) sleep were considered. Calculations were performed with the "Comprehensive Meta-Analysis" and "R" software. Using random effects modeling, for each disorder and each variable, a separate meta-analysis was conducted if at least 3 studies were available for calculation of effect sizes as standardized means (Hedges' g). Sources of variability, that is, sex, age, and mental disorders comorbidity, were evaluated in subgroup analyses. Sleep alterations were evidenced in all disorders, with the exception of ADHD and seasonal affective disorders. Sleep continuity problems were observed in most mental disorders. Sleep depth and REM pressure alterations were associated with affective, anxiety, autism and schizophrenia disorders. Comorbidity was associated with enhanced REM sleep pressure and more inhibition of sleep depth. No sleep parameter was exclusively altered in 1 condition; however, no 2 conditions shared the same PSG profile. Sleep continuity disturbances imply a transdiagnostic imbalance in the arousal system likely representing a basic dimension of mental health. Sleep depth and REM variables might play a key role in psychiatric comorbidity processes. Constellations of sleep alterations may define distinct disorders better than alterations in 1 single variable. (PsycINFO Database Record
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Clin Psychol Rev
                Clin Psychol Rev
                Clinical Psychology Review
                Elsevier Science
                0272-7358
                1873-7811
                1 June 2017
                June 2017
                : 54
                : 1-16
                Affiliations
                [a ]Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
                [b ]Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, UK
                [c ]Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK
                [d ]Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Building 1, UK.School of Health SciencesUniversity of ManchesterCoupland Building 1UK donna.littlewood@ 123456manchester.ac.uk
                Article
                S0272-7358(16)30310-5
                10.1016/j.cpr.2017.03.009
                5434037
                28371648
                ea27273e-8b52-4685-806f-b2e5cea64fd0
                © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 15 August 2016
                : 29 November 2016
                : 27 March 2017
                Categories
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                suicide,suicidal ideation,suicidal behaviour,sleep,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article