0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiphase characterization of AGN winds in five local type-2 quasars

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We present MEGARA integral field unit (IFU) observations of five local type-2 quasars (QSO2s, z ∼ 0.1) from the Quasar Feedback (QSOFEED) sample. These active galactic nuclei (AGN) have bolometric luminosities of 10 45.5 − 46 erg s −1 and stellar masses of ∼10 11 M . The LR-V grating of MEGARA allows us to explore the kinematics of the ionized gas through the [O III] λ5007 Å emission line. The nuclear spectra of the five QSO2s, extracted in a circular aperture of ∼1.2″ (∼2.2 kpc) in diameter, matching the resolution of these seeing-limited observations, show signatures of high velocity winds in the form of broad (full width at half maximum, 1300 ≤ FWHM ≤ 2240 km s −1) and blueshifted components. We found that four out of the five QSO2s present outflows that we can resolve with our seeing-limited data, and they have radii ranging from 3.1 to 12.6 kpc. In the case of the two QSO2s with extended radio emission, we found that it is well aligned with the outflows, suggesting that low-power jets might be compressing and accelerating the ionized gas in these radio-quiet QSO2s. In the four QSO2s with spatially resolved outflows, we measured ionized mass outflow rates of 3.3–6.5 M yr −1 when we used [S II]-based densities, and of 0.7–1.6 M yr −1 when trans-auroral line-based densities were considered instead. We compared them with the corresponding molecular mass outflow rates (8–16 M yr −1), derived from CO(2–1) ALMA observations at 0.2″ resolution. The cold molecular outflows carry more mass than their ionized counterparts. However, both phases show lower outflow mass rates than those expected from observational scaling relations where uniform assumptions on the outflow properties were adopted. This might be indicating that the AGN luminosity is not the only driver of massive outflows and/or that these relations need to be rescaled using accurate outflow properties (i.e., electron density and radius). We did not find a significant impact of the outflows on the global star formation rates when considering the energy budget of the molecular and ionized outflows together. However, spatially resolved measurements of recent star formation in these targets are needed in order to evaluate this fairly, considering the dynamical timescales of the outflows, of 3–20 Myr for the ionized gas and 1–10 Myr for the molecular gas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references102

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Binary Companions of Evolved Stars in APOGEE DR14: Search Method and Catalog of ∼5000 Companions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Astronomy & Astrophysics
                A&A
                EDP Sciences
                0004-6361
                1432-0746
                January 2024
                January 16 2024
                January 2024
                : 681
                : A63
                Article
                10.1051/0004-6361/202347715
                e980c873-e31e-4332-92ef-b147e41b8e18
                © 2024

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article