32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Confounding and exposure misclassification are issues that concern epidemiologists because of their potential to bias results of studies and complicate interpretations. In occupational epidemiology both are routinely raised to argue that an observed result is either a false positive or a false negative finding. Although it is important to consider the potential for limitations of epidemiologic investigations, judgment regarding their importance should be based on their actual likelihood of occurrence.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am J Ind Med
          American journal of industrial medicine
          Wiley
          0271-3586
          0271-3586
          Mar 2007
          : 50
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
          Article
          10.1002/ajim.20281
          17096363
          e8b337e7-22d7-46d7-a4f6-73fa57d4d503
          (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article