3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The seedbeds of Tuberculosis: is it time to target congregate settings and workplaces?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Countries where the incidence of Tuberculosis (TB) is low display a low transmission rate in the general population, and this rate has progressively declined in recent decades; however, TB epidemiology has shown a shift of the disease burden from the general population to specific populations at higher risk, such as vulnerable individuals and hard-to-reach groups. In low-incidence countries, preventive and therapeutic strategies must therefore be geared towards targeted interventions in these populations, with the priority being to promptly identify and treat latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) rather than manage infectious cases. One of the most complex challenges in this area is to identify population subgroups with increased incidence/prevalence of LTBI/TB.

          The aim of this study was to provide a concise overview of the main studies and available evidence concerning the epidemiology of TB and LTBI in non-healthcare congregate settings, with specific emphasis on studies conducted in occupational settings and workplaces.

          Recognizing settings at increased risk might contribute to eliminating TB in low-incidence countries, a challenge which requires tailored responses.

          Occupational and preventive medicine has a major role to play in directing ad hoc policies and programs of LTBI surveillance. If TB is to be eradicated, it is essential to contain the seedbeds of infection: indeed, as long as a large reservoir of infected subjects exists, new active TB cases may arise at any time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A scoping review of rapid review methods

          Background Rapid reviews are a form of knowledge synthesis in which components of the systematic review process are simplified or omitted to produce information in a timely manner. Although numerous centers are conducting rapid reviews internationally, few studies have examined the methodological characteristics of rapid reviews. We aimed to examine articles, books, and reports that evaluated, compared, used or described rapid reviews or methods through a scoping review. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, internet websites of rapid review producers, and reference lists were searched to identify articles for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened literature search results and abstracted data from included studies. Descriptive analysis was conducted. Results We included 100 articles plus one companion report that were published between 1997 and 2013. The studies were categorized as 84 application papers, seven development papers, six impact papers, and four comparison papers (one was included in two categories). The rapid reviews were conducted between 1 and 12 months, predominantly in Europe (58 %) and North America (20 %). The included studies failed to report 6 % to 73 % of the specific systematic review steps examined. Fifty unique rapid review methods were identified; 16 methods occurred more than once. Streamlined methods that were used in the 82 rapid reviews included limiting the literature search to published literature (24 %) or one database (2 %), limiting inclusion criteria by date (68 %) or language (49 %), having one person screen and another verify or screen excluded studies (6 %), having one person abstract data and another verify (23 %), not conducting risk of bias/quality appraisal (7 %) or having only one reviewer conduct the quality appraisal (7 %), and presenting results as a narrative summary (78 %). Four case studies were identified that compared the results of rapid reviews to systematic reviews. Three studies found that the conclusions between rapid reviews and systematic reviews were congruent. Conclusions Numerous rapid review approaches were identified and few were used consistently in the literature. Poor quality of reporting was observed. A prospective study comparing the results from rapid reviews to those obtained through systematic reviews is warranted. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incipient and Subclinical Tuberculosis: a Clinical Review of Early Stages and Progression of Infection.

            SUMMARYTuberculosis (TB) is the leading infectious cause of mortality worldwide, due in part to a limited understanding of its clinical pathogenic spectrum of infection and disease. Historically, scientific research, diagnostic testing, and drug treatment have focused on addressing one of two disease states: latent TB infection or active TB disease. Recent research has clearly demonstrated that human TB infection, from latent infection to active disease, exists within a continuous spectrum of metabolic bacterial activity and antagonistic immunological responses. This revised understanding leads us to propose two additional clinical states: incipient and subclinical TB. The recognition of incipient and subclinical TB, which helps divide latent and active TB along the clinical disease spectrum, provides opportunities for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to prevent progression to active TB disease and transmission of TB bacilli. In this report, we review the current understanding of the pathogenesis, immunology, clinical epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of both incipient and subclinical TB, two emerging clinical states of an ancient bacterium.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The global prevalence of latent tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

              In 1999, the WHO estimated that one-third of the world's population had latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) which was recently updated to one-fourth. However, this is still based on controversial assumptions in combination with tuberculin skin test (TST) surveys. Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) with a higher specificity than TST have since been widely implemented, but never used to estimate the global LTBI prevalence. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of LTBI estimates based on both IGRA and TST results published between 2005 and 2018. Regional and global estimates of LTBI prevalence were calculated. Stratification was performed for low, intermediate and high TB incidence countries and a pooled estimate for each area was calculated using a random effects model. Among 3280 studies screened, we included 88 studies from 36 countries with 41 IGRA (n=67 167) and 67 TST estimates (n=284 644). The global prevalence of LTBI was 24.8% (95% CI: 19.7–30.0%) and 21.2% (95% CI: 17.9–24.4%) based on IGRA and a 10 mm TST cut-off respectively. The prevalence estimates correlated well to WHO incidence rates (Rs=0.70, p<0.001). In the first study of the global prevalence of LTBI derived from both IGRA and TST surveys, we found that one-fourth of the world's population is infected. This is of relevance as both tests, although imperfect, are used to identify individuals eligible for preventive therapy. Enhanced efforts are needed targeting the large pool of latently infected as these individuals continuously constitutes an enormous source of potential active TB.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Prev Med Hyg
                J Prev Med Hyg
                JPMH
                Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
                Pacini Editore Srl
                1121-2233
                2421-4248
                06 October 2020
                September 2020
                : 61
                : 3
                : E324-E330
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa , Italy
                [2 ] IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino Hospital , Genoa, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Alfredo Montecucco, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa and IRCCS Polyclinic of San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy - E-mail: alfredo.montecucco@ 123456edu.unige.it
                Article
                10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2020.61.3.1759
                7595065
                33150222
                e8ae1a34-1da6-4b80-b278-ea2d163514e4
                ©2020 Pacini Editore SRL, Pisa, Italy

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en

                History
                : 04 September 2020
                : 24 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 24, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Overview

                tuberculosis,tb,latent tuberculosis infection,ltbi,occupational medicine,public health,congregate settings and workplaces,elimination

                Comments

                Comment on this article