6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: an Australian survey of health issues.

      Social Science & Medicine (1982)
      Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Attitude to Health, Australia, Child, Ethics, Medical, Family, Female, Health Care Rationing, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Life Style, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Organ Transplantation, Patient Selection, Quality of Health Care, economics, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Resource Allocation, Smoking, Social Justice, Social Values

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Economists have often treated the objective of health services as being the maximization of the QALYs gained, irrespective of how the gains are distributed. In a cross section of Australians such a policy of distributive neutrality received: (a) very little support when health benefits to young people compete with health benefits to the elderly; (b) only moderate support when those who can become a little better compete with those who can become much better; (c) only moderate support when smokers compete with non smokers; (d) some support when young children compete with newborns; and (e) wide spread support when parents of dependent children compete with people without children. Overall, the views of the study population were strongly egalitarian. A policy of health benefit maximization received very limited support when the consequence is a loss of equity and access to services for the elderly and for people with a limited potential for improving their health.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article