18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Financial Burden of Drugs Prescribed for Cancer-Associated Symptoms

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          PURPOSE:

          The financial toxicity of anticancer drugs is well-documented, but little is known about the costs of drugs used to manage cancer-associated symptoms.

          METHODS:

          We reviewed relevant guidelines and compiled drugs used to manage seven cancer-associated symptoms (anorexia and cachexia, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, constipation, diarrhea, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, cancer-associated fatigue, and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting). Using GoodRx website, we identified the retail price (cash price at retail pharmacies) and lowest price (discounted, best-case scenario of out-of-pocket costs) for patients without insurance for each drug or formulation for a typical fill. We describe lowest prices here.

          RESULTS:

          For anorexia and cachexia, costs ranged from $5 US dollars (USD; generic olanzapine or mirtazapine tablets) to $1,156 USD (brand-name dronabinol solution) and varied widely by formulation of the same drug or dosage: for olanzapine 5 mg, $5 USD (generic tablet) to $239 USD (brand-name orally disintegrating tablet). For chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, costs of duloxetine varied from $12 USD (generic) to $529 USD (brand-name). For constipation, the cost of sennosides or polyethylene glycol was <$15 USD, whereas newer agents such as methylnaltrexone were expensive ($1,001 USD). For diarrhea, the cost of generic loperamide or diphenoxylate-atropine tablets was <$15 USD. For exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, only brand-name formulations were available, range of cost, $1,072 USD-$1,514 USD. For cancer-associated fatigue, the cost of generic dexamethasone or dexmethylphenidate was <$15 USD, whereas brand-name modafinil was more costly ($1,284 USD). For a 4-drug nausea and vomiting prophylaxis regimen, costs ranged from $181 USD to $1,430 USD.

          CONCLUSION:

          We highlight the high costs of many symptom control drugs and the wide variation in the costs of these drugs. These findings can guide patient-clinician discussions about cost-effectively managing symptoms, while promoting the use of less expensive formulations when possible.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline.

          To provide evidence-based guidance on the optimum prevention and treatment approaches in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies (CIPN) in adult cancer survivors. A systematic literature search identified relevant, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of CIPN. Primary outcomes included incidence and severity of neuropathy as measured by neurophysiologic changes, patient-reported outcomes, and quality of life. A total of 48 RCTs met eligibility criteria and comprise the evidentiary basis for the recommendations. Trials tended to be small and heterogeneous, many with insufficient sample sizes to detect clinically important differences in outcomes. Primary outcomes varied across the trials, and in most cases, studies were not directly comparable because of different outcomes, measurements, and instruments used at different time points. The strength of the recommendations is based on the quality, amount, and consistency of the evidence and the balance between benefits and harms. On the basis of the paucity of high-quality, consistent evidence, there are no agents recommended for the prevention of CIPN. With regard to the treatment of existing CIPN, the best available data support a moderate recommendation for treatment with duloxetine. Although the CIPN trials are inconclusive regarding tricyclic antidepressants (such as nortriptyline), gabapentin, and a compounded topical gel containing baclofen, amitriptyline HCL, and ketamine, these agents may be offered on the basis of data supporting their utility in other neuropathic pain conditions given the limited other CIPN treatment options. Further research on these agents is warranted. © 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2016 MASCC and ESMO guideline update for the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Management of Cancer Cachexia: ASCO Guideline

              To provide evidence-based guidance on the clinical management of cancer cachexia in adult patients with advanced cancer. A systematic review of the literature collected evidence regarding nutritional, pharmacologic, and other interventions, such as exercise, for cancer cachexia. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of RCTs published from 1966 through October 17, 2019. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. The review included 20 systematic reviews and 13 additional RCTs. Dietary counseling, with or without oral nutritional supplements, was reported to increase body weight in some trials, but evidence remains limited. Pharmacologic interventions associated with improvements in appetite and/or body weight include progesterone analogs and corticosteroids. The other evaluated interventions either had no benefit or insufficient evidence of benefit to draw conclusions on efficacy. Limitations of the evidence include high drop-out rates, consistent with advanced cancer, as well as variability across studies in outcomes of interest and methods for outcome assessment. Dietary counseling may be offered with the goals of providing patients and caregivers with advice for the management of cachexia. Enteral feeding tubes and parenteral nutrition should not be used routinely. In the absence of more robust evidence, no specific pharmacological intervention can be recommended as the standard of care; therefore, clinicians may choose not to prescribe medications specifically for the treatment of cancer cachexia. Nonetheless, when it is decided to trial a drug to improve appetite and/or improve weight gain, currently available pharmacologic interventions that may be used include progesterone analogs and short-term (weeks) corticosteroids.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JCO Oncol Pract
                JCO Oncol Pract
                op
                OP
                JCO Oncology Practice
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                2688-1527
                2688-1535
                February 2022
                24 September 2021
                24 September 2021
                : 18
                : 2
                : 140-147
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
                [ 2 ]Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
                [ 3 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA
                [ 4 ]Division of Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, PA
                [ 5 ]Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
                [ 6 ]Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
                [ 7 ]Department of Hematology Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
                [ 8 ]Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
                [ 9 ]Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
                [ 10 ]Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
                Author notes
                Stacie B. Dusetzina, PhD, Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2525 West End Ave, Ste 1203, Nashville, TN 37203; e-mail: s.dusetzina@ 123456vanderbilt.edu .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0875-4731
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9638-3629
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8937-0726
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0673-879X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5433-4810
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0758-7911
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-3248
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6530-7415
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-9196
                Article
                OP.21.00466
                10.1200/OP.21.00466
                9213200
                34558297
                e786c1ac-17b7-4ad3-b90e-3ef46e8bc1fc
                © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

                Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 21 June 2021
                : 28 July 2021
                : 1 September 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 56, Pages: 0
                Categories
                ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
                Care Delivery
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article