Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Neighborhood Sanitation and Infant Mortality

      1 , 2
      American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
      American Economic Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding differences in health behaviors by education.

          Using a variety of data sets from two countries, we examine possible explanations for the relationship between education and health behaviors, known as the education gradient. We show that income, health insurance, and family background can account for about 30 percent of the gradient. Knowledge and measures of cognitive ability explain an additional 30 percent. Social networks account for another 10 percent. Our proxies for discounting, risk aversion, or the value of future do not account for any of the education gradient, and neither do personality factors such as a sense of control of oneself or over one's life. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Determinants of Mortality

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Disease and Development: Evidence from Hookworm Eradication in the American South.

              This study evaluates the economic consequences of the successful eradication of hookworm disease from the American South. The hookworm-eradication campaign (c. 1910) began soon after (i) the discovery that a variety of health problems among Southerners could be attributed to the disease and (ii) the donation by John D. Rockefeller of a substantial sum to the effort. The Rockefeller Sanitary Commission (RSC) surveyed infection rates in the affected areas (eleven southern states) and found that an average of forty percent of school-aged children were infected with hookworm. The RSC then sponsored treatment and education campaigns across the region. Follow-up studies indicate that this campaign substantially reduced hookworm disease almost immediately. The sudden introduction of this treatment combines with the cross-area differences in pre-treatment infection rates to form the basis of the identification strategy. Areas with higher levels of hookworm infection prior to the RSC experienced greater increases in school enrollment, attendance, and literacy after the intervention. This result is robust to controlling for a variety of alternative factors, including differential trends across areas, changing crop prices, shifts in certain educational and health policies, and the effect of malaria eradication. No significant contemporaneous results are found for adults, who should have benefited less from the intervention owing to their substantially lower (prior) infection rates. A long-term follow-up of affected cohorts indicates a substantial gain in income that coincided with exposure to hookworm eradication. I also find evidence that eradication increased the return to schooling.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
                American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
                American Economic Association
                1945-7782
                1945-7790
                April 2018
                April 2018
                : 10
                : 2
                : 125-162
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Economics, University of Texas at Austin, 2225 Speedway, Austin, TX 78712 and NBER (email: )
                [2 ]Department of Economics, University of Texas at Austin, 2225 Speedway, Austin, TX 78712; Economics and Planning Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi; and r.i.c.e. (email: )
                Article
                10.1257/app.20150431
                38213507
                e69d6ff6-cc35-4b3b-ac0b-61d8445926ef
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content3,337

                Cited by38

                Most referenced authors324