1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nurses’ Personality Traits and Perceived Work Environments During Public Health Emergencies: Implications for Nursing Workforce Planning

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The nursing workforce faces substantial challenges, particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 era. Developing an effective strategy for workforce maintenance and the strategic deployment of nurses is crucial.

          Purpose

          This study aimed to explore and categorize nurses’ personality traits, with a focus on analyzing differences in their perceptions of the nursing work environment.

          Participants and Methods

          Between January 2023 and February 2023, a multi-center cross-sectional study was carried out involving nurses from 12 tertiary hospitals actively engaged in frontline COVID-19 response duties. Through cluster sampling, surveys were distributed among eligible nursing staff, comprising a general information questionnaire, the Chinese Big Five Personality Questionnaire-Short Form, subjective evaluations of emergency nursing management, and the Chinese Nursing Work Environment Scale for Public Health Emergencies. Various statistical analyses, such as descriptive analysis, cluster analysis, non-parametric tests, and general linear model analysis, were employed to investigate the correlation between personality types and the perception of nursing work environments.

          Results

          The analysis encompassed 1059 valid questionnaires, reflecting the experiences of frontline nurses. The majority of these nurses possessed 1–5 years of experience, held junior professional titles, volunteered for their roles, and served as attending nurses. Categorization based on personality traits revealed three groups: resilient (35.60%), ordinary (16.15%), and distressed (48.25%) types. Significantly distinct perceptions of nursing work environments emerged among these categories, with resilient and ordinary types expressing notably higher satisfaction compared to the distressed group (H value = 256.487, p < 0.001).

          Conclusion

          This study illustrates the connection between nurses’ perceived working environment and their personality traits. Nursing managers should factor in nurses’ personality traits when choosing and deploying frontline responders during public health emergencies. Prioritizing resilient-type nurses and crafting a supportive work environment that aligns with nurses’ characteristics is indispensable for an effective emergency response.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

          Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover 3 main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors, to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all 3 study designs and 4 are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available at http://www.annals.org and on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emergency nurses: a systematic review of 25 years of research.

            Burnout is an important problem in health care professionals and is associated with a decrease in occupational well-being and an increase in absenteeism, turnover and illness. Nurses are found to be vulnerable to burnout, but emergency nurses are even more so, since emergency nursing is characterized by unpredictability, overcrowding and continuous confrontation with a broad range of diseases, injuries and traumatic events.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Regulatory Flexibility: An Individual Differences Perspective on Coping and Emotion Regulation.

              People respond to stressful events in different ways, depending on the event and on the regulatory strategies they choose. Coping and emotion regulation theorists have proposed dynamic models in which these two factors, the person and the situation, interact over time to inform adaptation. In practice, however, researchers have tended to assume that particular regulatory strategies are consistently beneficial or maladaptive. We label this assumption the fallacy of uniform efficacy and contrast it with findings from a number of related literatures that have suggested the emergence of a broader but as yet poorly defined construct that we refer to as regulatory flexibility. In this review, we articulate this broader construct and define both its features and limitations. Specifically, we propose a heuristic individual differences framework and review research on three sequential components of flexibility for which propensities and abilities vary: sensitivity to context, availability of a diverse repertoire of regulatory strategies, and responsiveness to feedback. We consider the methodological limitations of research on each component, review questions that future research on flexibility might address, and consider how the components might relate to each other and to broader conceptualizations about stability and change across persons and situations. © The Author(s) 2013.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                Risk Manag Healthc Policy
                rmhp
                Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
                Dove
                1179-1594
                09 May 2024
                2024
                : 17
                : 1199-1209
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai, 200025, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]Institute of Nursing Research and Department of Nursing of Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou, 310058, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Yun Hu, School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200025, People’s Republic of China, Email huyunsy@shsmu.edu.cn
                Article
                458235
                10.2147/RMHP.S458235
                11088948
                38737419
                e67b100f-7f1e-449f-b219-db6c1ae135aa
                © 2024 Wang et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 05 January 2024
                : 02 May 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, References: 47, Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: the Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine: Nursing Development Program, and the Medical Innovation Talent Cultivation Program of Shanghai High-level Local Universities (CN) (grant numbers: HLDC22-01 and HLBKBSJJ22-07);
                This study received support from the Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan Soft Science Research Project (grant numbers: 23692115200 and 23692108700), the Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine: Nursing Development Program, and the Medical Innovation Talent Cultivation Program of Shanghai High-level Local Universities (CN) (grant numbers: HLDC22-01 and HLBKBSJJ22-07).
                Categories
                Original Research

                Social policy & Welfare
                workforce management,cross-sectional studies,human resources,health system

                Comments

                Comment on this article