12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Hybrid therapy with locoregional steroid injection and polyglycolic acid sheets to prevent stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and study aim: The incidence of stricture formation caused by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for widespread lesions is high, and stricture formation can reduce quality of life. We evaluated the prophylactic efficacy of hybrid therapy using a locoregional steroid injection and polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets with fibrin glue to prevent stricture formation after esophageal ESD in high risk patients in whom we predicted stricture formation would be difficult to prevent with a single prophylactic steroid injection.

          Methods: Ten patients who underwent esophageal ESD were enrolled (entire-circumference: n = 6; sub-circumference, more than 5/6 of the circumference: n = 4). A single locoregional steroid injection and PGA sheets with fibrin glue were used after ESD. We evaluated the incidence of stricture formation, the number of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) procedures needed to treat the stricture formation, and adverse events of the therapy.

          Results: Esophageal stricture formation occurred in 50.0 % of patients (5/10) (median EBD sessions 0.5, range 0 – 16). Subanalysis showed that stricture formation occurred in 37.5 % of patients (3/8) excluded the lesions located near a previous scar from ESD or surgical anastomosis site (median EBD sessions 0, range 0 – 4).

          Conclusion: Hybrid therapy using a locoregional steroid injection and PGA sheets with fibrin glue may have the potential to prevent esophageal stricture formation after esophageal ESD in high risk patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predictors of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous cell neoplasms.

          Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is becoming accepted as an established treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms, the risks for developing postoperative stricture have not been elucidated. This was a retrospective study at a single institution. From January 2002 to October 2008, 65 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasms (HGINs) or m2 carcinomas treated by ESD were enrolled. Predictors of postoperative stricture were investigated by comparing results from 11 patients who developed strictures with those from 54 patients who did not. Significant differences between the two groups were observed in longitudinal diameter (45.0 +/- 15.9 mm vs. 31.5 +/- 13.6 mm) and circumferential diameter (37.2 +/- 8.6 mm vs. 26.8 +/- 9.7 mm) of the resected specimens, and the proportion of extension to the whole circumference of the lumen ( 1 / 2/ > 3 / 4 : 2 / 4 / 5 vs. 40 / 13 / 1), histologic depth (HGIN/m2 : 2 / 9 vs. 41 / 13), and procedure time (85.6 +/- 42.8 minutes vs. 53.3 +/- 30.1 minutes). Multivariate analysis revealed that circumferential extension of > 3 / 4 (odds ration [OR]: 44.2; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 4.4 - 443.6) and histologic depth to m2 (OR: 14.2; 95 %CI: 2.7 - 74.2) are reliable risk factors. Subanalysis for each category by combinations of these risk factors revealed that patients with lesions in > 3 / 4 of the circumferential area were associated with a high rate of postoperative stricture. By contrast, patients with HGIN lesions in < 3 / 4 extension have no probability of postoperative strictures. Additionally, subanalysis of patients with m2 lesions in < 3 / 4 circumferential extension revealed that circumferential diameter can be a reliable predictor for postoperative stricture. Circumferential extension and histologic depth are the reliable risk factors for postoperative strictures. In combination with circumferential diameter, we can perform effective and appropriate preventive balloon dilatations after esophageal ESD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Usefulness of oral prednisolone in the treatment of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

            Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) permits en bloc removal of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, postprocedure stricture is common after ESD for extensive tumors, and multiple endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is required for recalcitrant cases. To evaluate the effectiveness of oral prednisolone in controlling postprocedure esophageal stricture. Retrospective study. Endoscopy department at a university hospital. Patients who underwent complete circular or semicircular ESD for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma involving more than three fourths of the lumen were treated with either pre-emptive EBD or oral prednisolone. Preemptive EBD was started on the third day post-ESD and continued twice weekly for 8 weeks. Oral prednisolone was started at 30 mg/day on the third day post-ESD , tapered gradually, and then discontinued 8 weeks later. An additional EBD was performed on demand in both groups whenever dysphagia appeared. The incidence of esophageal stricture and number of EBD sessions required to relieve dysphagia. Stricture at 3 months after ESD was found in 7 of 22 patients in the preemptive EBD group but only 1 of 19 in the oral prednisolone group (P < .05). The average number of EBD sessions required was 15.6 in the preemptive EBD group and 1.7 in the oral prednisolone group (P < .0001). After complete circular ESD, 32.7 EBD sessions were needed on average in the preemptive EBD group, whereas fewer were needed in the oral prednisolone group (P < .05). Nonrandomized study. Post-ESD esophageal strictures were persistent even if treated preemptively with multiple EBD sessions, but oral prednisolone may offer a useful preventive option. Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A randomized controlled trial of endoscopic steroid injection for prophylaxis of esophageal stenoses after extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection

              Background Esophageal stenosis following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a serious adverse event that makes subsequent management more difficult. Methods This parallel, randomized, controlled, open-label study was designed to examine whether local steroid injection is an effective prophylactic treatment for esophageal stenoses following extensive ESD. This single center trial was conducted at the Keiyukai Hospital, a tertiary care center for gastrointestinal disease in Japan [University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR) on 15 September 2011 (UMIN000006327)]. Thirty-two patients with mucosal defects involving ≥75% of the esophageal circumference were randomized to receive a single dose of triamcinolone acetonide injections (n = 16) or be treated conventionally (n = 16). The primary outcome was the frequency of stricture requiring endoscopic dilatation; the surrogate primary endpoint was the number of dilatation sessions needed. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rates, the minimum diameter of the stenotic area and the duration of the course of dilatation treatments. Results The frequency of stricture was not significantly different between the groups because of insufficient statistical power, but the number of dilatation sessions required was significantly less in the steroid group (6.1 sessions [95% confidence interval, CI 2.8–9.4] versus 12.5 [95% CI 7.1–17.9] sessions in the control group; P = 0.04). The perforation rate was similar in both groups. The minimum diameter of stenotic lumens was significantly greater in the treatment group than controls (11.0 mm versus 7.1 mm, respectively; P = 0.01). The perforation rate was not significantly different between the groups (1.0% versus 0.5% in the treatment and control group, respectively). Steroid injection was effective in cases of mucosal defects encompassing the entire esophageal circumference. Conclusions Prophylactic endoscopic steroid injection appears to be a safe means of relieving the severity of esophageal stenoses following extensive ESD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endosc Int Open
                Endosc Int Open
                10.1055/s-00025476
                Endoscopy International Open
                © Georg Thieme Verlag KG (Stuttgart · New York )
                2364-3722
                2196-9736
                September 2016
                25 August 2016
                : 4
                : 9
                : E1017-E1022
                Affiliations
                Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
                Author notes
                Corresponding author Kazunari Tominaga, MD, PhD Department of Gastroenterology Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine 1-4-3AsahimachiAbeno-kuOsaka545-8585Japan+81-6-66453813 tomy@ 123456med.osaka-cu.ac.jp
                Article
                10.1055/s-0042-111906
                5025303
                27652294
                e5b59373-14c3-4f32-bb91-64b6bc2d2fdb
                © Thieme Medical Publishers
                History
                : 23 March 2016
                : 13 June 2016
                Categories
                Original article

                Comments

                Comment on this article