1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of EPAS1 variants for association with bovine congestive heart failure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:  Bovine congestive heart failure (BCHF) has become increasingly prevalent in feedlot cattle in the Western Great Plains of North America. BCHF is an untreatable complex condition involving pulmonary hypertension that culminates in right ventricular failure and death. A protein variant of hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha (HIF2α, encoded by the endothelial PAS domain-containing protein 1 gene, EPAS1) was previously reported to be associated with pulmonary hypertension at altitudes exceeding 2,000 m. Our aim was to evaluate EPAS1 haplotypes for association with BCHF in feedlot cattle raised at moderate altitudes (1,200 m).

          Methods: Paired samples of clinical cases and unaffected controls were collected at four feedlots in Nebraska and Wyoming. Each pair (n =102) was matched for source, pen, breed type, sex, arrival date, and management conditions. Cases were identified by animal caretakers, euthanized, and diagnosis was confirmed at necropsy. Cases were derived from 30 different ranch operations, with the largest source contributing 32. Animals were tested for eight EPAS1 haplotypes encoding 36 possible different diploid combinations.

          Results: The common, ancestral EPAS1 haplotype encoding HIF2α with alanine (A) at position 606 and glycine (G) at position 610 was equally frequent in cases and controls (0.67). The EPAS1 variant haplotype reported to be associated with disease (encoding threonine (T) at position 606 and serine (S) at position 610) was not enriched in cases compared with controls (0.21 and 0.25, respectively). Frequencies of other EPAS1 haplotypes (e.g., encoding Q270, L362, or G671) were each less than 0.05 overall. McNemar’s test with 45 discordant pairs showed the linked T606/S610 variant was not associated with BCHF (OR = 0.73, CI 95 0.38 -1.4, p-value = 0.37).

          Conclusions: HIF2α polypeptide variants were not significantly associated with BCHF in feedlot cattle at moderate altitudes. Thus, a wider search is needed to identify genetic risk factors underlying this disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages.

          Q McNEMAR (1947)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology

            Background Case-control studies are a common and efficient means of studying rare diseases or illnesses with long latency periods. Matching of cases and controls is frequently employed to control the effects of known potential confounding variables. The analysis of matched data requires specific statistical methods. Methods The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of published, peer-reviewed matched case-control studies that used statistical methods appropriate for matched data. Using a comprehensive set of search criteria we identified 37 matched case-control studies for detailed analysis. Results Among these 37 articles, only 16 studies were analyzed with proper statistical techniques (43%). Studies that were properly analyzed were more likely to have included case patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease compared to those that did not use proper statistics (10/16 or 63%, versus 5/21 or 24%, P = 0.02). They were also more likely to have matched multiple controls for each case (14/16 or 88%, versus 13/21 or 62%, P = 0.08). In addition, studies with properly analyzed data were more likely to have been published in a journal with an impact factor listed in the top 100 according to the Journal Citation Reports index (12/16 or 69%, versus 1/21 or 5%, P ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion The findings of this study raise concern that the majority of matched case-control studies report results that are derived from improper statistical analyses. This may lead to errors in estimating the relationship between a disease and exposure, as well as the incorrect adaptation of emerging medical literature.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Prevalence of the prion protein gene E211K variant in U.S. cattle

              Background In 2006, an atypical U.S. case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) was discovered in Alabama and later reported to be polymorphic for glutamate (E) and lysine (K) codons at position 211 in the bovine prion protein gene (Prnp) coding sequence. A bovine E211K mutation is important because it is analogous to the most common pathogenic mutation in humans (E200K) which causes hereditary Creutzfeldt – Jakob disease, an autosomal dominant form of prion disease. The present report describes a high-throughput matrix-associated laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry assay for scoring the Prnp E211K variant and its use to determine an upper limit for the K211 allele frequency in U.S. cattle. Results The K211 allele was not detected in 6062 cattle, including those from five commercial beef processing plants (3892 carcasses) and 2170 registered cattle from 42 breeds. Multiple nearby polymorphisms in Prnp coding sequence of 1456 diverse purebred cattle (42 breeds) did not interfere with scoring E211 or K211 alleles. Based on these results, the upper bounds for prevalence of the E211K variant was estimated to be extremely low, less than 1 in 2000 cattle (Bayesian analysis based on 95% quantile of the posterior distribution with a uniform prior). Conclusion No groups or breeds of U.S. cattle are presently known to harbor the Prnp K211 allele. Because a carrier was not detected, the number of additional atypical BSE cases with K211 will also be vanishingly low.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data CurationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Resources
                Role: Investigation
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                F1000Res
                F1000Res
                F1000Research
                F1000Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2046-1402
                25 July 2019
                2019
                : 8
                : 1189
                Affiliations
                [1 ]U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska, 68933, USA
                [2 ]University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Clay Center, Nebraska, 68933, USA
                [3 ]Anschutz School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, 80045, USA
                [4 ]Neogen GeneSeek Operations, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68504, USA
                [1 ]Integrated Livestock Management, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
                [1 ]The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
                [1 ]Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Fermoy, Ireland
                Author notes

                Competing interests: The authors declare the following interest: co-author V.B. is a full-time employee at GeneSeek, a Neogen company that provides agrigenomic and veterinary diagnostic services. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products to declare. These interests do not alter the authors’ adherence to all the journal’s policies on sharing data and materials.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1386-1208
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0732-2590
                Article
                10.12688/f1000research.19951.1
                6733380
                31543958
                e59b6165-f1d8-407d-9258-3004a622cbbf
                Copyright: © 2019 Heaton MP et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Nebraska Beef Industry Endowment
                Award ID: 2662390323001
                Funded by: Agricultural Research Service
                Award ID: 5438-32000-033-00D
                Funded by: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
                Award ID: 2162390003
                Funding for this research was provided by the USDA, ARS appropriated projects [5438-32000-033-00D] (MPH) and The University of Nebraska Great Plains Veterinary Educational Center [2162390003] (DMG, BLVL) and the Nebraska Beef Industry Endowment [2662390323001] (BLVL).
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Articles

                heart failure,cattle,epas1,hif2a,brisket disease,pulmonary hypertension,feedlot

                Comments

                Comment on this article