1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Colorectal Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Before vs During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Was the COVID-19 pandemic associated with more advanced oncologic stage at presentation for colorectal cancer?

          Findings

          This cohort study including 17 938 patients treated for colorectal cancer at 81 Italian centers between 2018 and 2021 showed that patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer during the pandemic period had higher odds of diagnoses of late-stage cancer, distant metastasis, and stenotic lesions.

          Meaning

          This study suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with diagnosis of colorectal cancer at a more advanced stage, which could potentially translate to a reduction in survival.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Delays in screening programs and the reluctance of patients to seek medical attention because of the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 could be associated with the risk of more advanced colorectal cancers at diagnosis.

          Objective

          To evaluate whether the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was associated with more advanced oncologic stage and change in clinical presentation for patients with colorectal cancer.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included all 17 938 adult patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer from March 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021 (pandemic period), and from January 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020 (prepandemic period), in 81 participating centers in Italy, including tertiary centers and community hospitals. Follow-up was 30 days from surgery.

          Exposures

          Any type of surgical procedure for colorectal cancer, including explorative surgery, palliative procedures, and atypical or segmental resections.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcome was advanced stage of colorectal cancer at diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were distant metastasis, T4 stage, aggressive biology (defined as cancer with at least 1 of the following characteristics: signet ring cells, mucinous tumor, budding, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and lymphangitis), stenotic lesion, emergency surgery, and palliative surgery. The independent association between the pandemic period and the outcomes was assessed using multivariate random-effects logistic regression, with hospital as the cluster variable.

          Results

          A total of 17 938 patients (10 007 men [55.8%]; mean [SD] age, 70.6 [12.2] years) underwent surgery for colorectal cancer: 7796 (43.5%) during the pandemic period and 10 142 (56.5%) during the prepandemic period. Logistic regression indicated that the pandemic period was significantly associated with an increased rate of advanced-stage colorectal cancer (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13; P = .03), aggressive biology (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.53; P < .001), and stenotic lesions (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31; P = .03).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This cohort study suggests a significant association between the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the risk of a more advanced oncologic stage at diagnosis among patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer and might indicate a potential reduction of survival for these patients.

          Abstract

          This cohort study evaluates whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with more advanced oncologic stage and change in clinical presentation for Italian patients with colorectal cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

            Although quality assessment is gaining increasing attention, there is still no consensus on how to define and grade postoperative complications. This shortcoming hampers comparison of outcome data among different centers and therapies and over time. A classification of complications published by one of the authors in 1992 was critically re-evaluated and modified to increase its accuracy and its acceptability in the surgical community. Modifications mainly focused on the manner of reporting life-threatening and permanently disabling complications. The new grading system still mostly relies on the therapy used to treat the complication. The classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients who underwent elective general surgery at our institution. The reproducibility and personal judgment of the classification were evaluated through an international survey with 2 questionnaires sent to 10 surgical centers worldwide. The new ranking system significantly correlated with complexity of surgery (P < 0.0001) as well as with the length of the hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A total of 144 surgeons from 10 different centers around the world and at different levels of training returned the survey. Ninety percent of the case presentations were correctly graded. The classification was considered to be simple (92% of the respondents), reproducible (91%), logical (92%), useful (90%), and comprehensive (89%). The answers of both questionnaires were not dependent on the origin of the reply and the level of training of the surgeons. The new complication classification appears reliable and may represent a compelling tool for quality assessment in surgery in all parts of the world.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Classification of Surgical Complications

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                21 November 2022
                November 2022
                21 November 2022
                : 5
                : 11
                : e2243119
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
                [4 ]Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
                [5 ]Department of Environmental and Preventive Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
                [6 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
                [7 ]Colorectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: October 7, 2022.
                Published: November 21, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43119
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Rottoli M et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Matteo Rottoli, MD, PhD, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy ( matteo.rottoli2@ 123456unibo.it ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Rottoli had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Rottoli, Poggioli.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Rottoli, Gori, Pellino, Flacco, Martellucci, Spinelli.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Rottoli, Gori, Flacco, Martellucci.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Rottoli, Gori, Pellino, Flacco, Spinelli, Poggioli.
                Statistical analysis: Flacco, Martellucci.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Rottoli, Gori, Spinelli.
                Supervision: Rottoli, Gori, Pellino, Poggioli.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Spinelli reported receiving personal fees from Johnson & Johnson and Takeda outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Group Information: The COVID–Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Study Group members appear in Supplement 2.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 3.
                Article
                zoi221212
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43119
                9679872
                36409496
                e478e392-c775-47fe-bb2f-2a0f39b1b94e
                Copyright 2022 Rottoli M et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 28 June 2022
                : 7 October 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Oncology

                Comments

                Comment on this article