6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Labor and childbirth care for women deprived of liberty: a scoping review Translated title: Asistencia durante el trabajo de parto y el parto a mujeres privadas de libertad: revisión del alcance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Objective:

          To map and analyze scientific evidence on care provided to women deprived of liberty during labor and childbirth.

          Method:

          A scoping review, developed in accordance with JBI methodology, whose information sources were accessed in databases and gray literature. Selection was carried out between October and December 2023, based on reading titles, abstracts and descriptors, considering the following eligibility criteria: articles, dissertations and theses with different methodological designs available in full, without language and time limitations. Analysis was conducted by two independent reviewers, using inductive content analysis.

          Results:

          Fifteen studies were included. From the synthesis of results, two categories emerged: From the cell to the delivery room: care for women deprived of liberty; Experiences of women deprived of liberty during labor and childbirth.

          Conclusion:

          This study highlights the fragility of care practices during labor and childbirth, imposing significant challenges and resulting in adverse experiences that compromise the quality of motherhood and violate women’s fundamental rights.

          RESUMEN

          Objetivo:

          Mapear y analizar evidencia científica sobre la asistencia brindada a mujeres privadas de libertad durante el parto y el nacimiento.

          Método:

          Revisión de alcance, desarrollada de acuerdo con el método JBI, a cuyas fuentes de información se accedió en bases de datos y literatura gris. La selección se realizó entre octubre y diciembre de 2023, a partir de la lectura de títulos, resúmenes y descriptores, considerando los siguientes criterios de elegibilidad: artículos, disertaciones y tesis con diferentes diseños metodológicos disponibles en su totalidad, sin límite de idioma ni de tiempo. El análisis fue realizado por dos revisores independientes, utilizando análisis de contenido inductivo.

          Resultados:

          Se incluyeron 15 estudios. De la síntesis de resultados surgieron dos categorías: De la celda a la sala de partos: asistencia a mujeres privadas de libertad; Experiencias de mujeres privadas de libertad durante el trabajo de parto y el parto.

          Conclusión:

          Este estudio resalta la fragilidad de las prácticas de cuidado durante el trabajo de parto y el nacimiento, imponiendo importantes desafíos y resultando en experiencias adversas que comprometen la calidad de la maternidad y violan los derechos fundamentales de las mujeres.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

            Background Synthesis of multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review can summarize the effects of individual outcomes and provide numerical answers about the effectiveness of interventions. Filtering of searches is time consuming, and no single method fulfills the principal requirements of speed with accuracy. Automation of systematic reviews is driven by a necessity to expedite the availability of current best evidence for policy and clinical decision-making. We developed Rayyan (http://rayyan.qcri.org), a free web and mobile app, that helps expedite the initial screening of abstracts and titles using a process of semi-automation while incorporating a high level of usability. For the beta testing phase, we used two published Cochrane reviews in which included studies had been selected manually. Their searches, with 1030 records and 273 records, were uploaded to Rayyan. Different features of Rayyan were tested using these two reviews. We also conducted a survey of Rayyan’s users and collected feedback through a built-in feature. Results Pilot testing of Rayyan focused on usability, accuracy against manual methods, and the added value of the prediction feature. The “taster” review (273 records) allowed a quick overview of Rayyan for early comments on usability. The second review (1030 records) required several iterations to identify the previously identified 11 trials. The “suggestions” and “hints,” based on the “prediction model,” appeared as testing progressed beyond five included studies. Post rollout user experiences and a reflexive response by the developers enabled real-time modifications and improvements. The survey respondents reported 40% average time savings when using Rayyan compared to others tools, with 34% of the respondents reporting more than 50% time savings. In addition, around 75% of the respondents mentioned that screening and labeling studies as well as collaborating on reviews to be the two most important features of Rayyan. As of November 2016, Rayyan users exceed 2000 from over 60 countries conducting hundreds of reviews totaling more than 1.6M citations. Feedback from users, obtained mostly through the app web site and a recent survey, has highlighted the ease in exploration of searches, the time saved, and simplicity in sharing and comparing include-exclude decisions. The strongest features of the app, identified and reported in user feedback, were its ability to help in screening and collaboration as well as the time savings it affords to users. Conclusions Rayyan is responsive and intuitive in use with significant potential to lighten the load of reviewers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The qualitative content analysis process.

              This paper is a description of inductive and deductive content analysis. Content analysis is a method that may be used with either qualitative or quantitative data and in an inductive or deductive way. Qualitative content analysis is commonly used in nursing studies but little has been published on the analysis process and many research books generally only provide a short description of this method. When using content analysis, the aim was to build a model to describe the phenomenon in a conceptual form. Both inductive and deductive analysis processes are represented as three main phases: preparation, organizing and reporting. The preparation phase is similar in both approaches. The concepts are derived from the data in inductive content analysis. Deductive content analysis is used when the structure of analysis is operationalized on the basis of previous knowledge. Inductive content analysis is used in cases where there are no previous studies dealing with the phenomenon or when it is fragmented. A deductive approach is useful if the general aim was to test a previous theory in a different situation or to compare categories at different time periods.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rev Esc Enferm USP
                Rev Esc Enferm USP
                reeusp
                Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
                Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
                0080-6234
                1980-220X
                13 September 2024
                2024
                : 58
                : e20240035
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Universidade Federal do Piauí, Departamento de Enfermagem, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
                [2 ]Universidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Enfermagem, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
                [1 ]Universidade Federal do Piauí, Departamento de Enfermagem, Teresina, PI, Brasil.
                [2 ]Universidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Enfermagem, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Tatyanne Maria Pereira de Oliveira, Rua Dr. Epifánio Carvalho, 1391, Ininga, 64048-550, Teresina, PI, Brazil, tatyanneoliveira@ 123456ufpi.edu.br

                ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Maria Helena Baena de Moraes Lopes

                Autor correspondente: Tatyanne Maria Pereira de Oliveira, Rua Dr. Epifánio Carvalho, 1391, Ininga, 64048-550, Teresina, PI, Brasil, tatyanneoliveira@ 123456ufpi.edu.br

                EDITORA ASSOCIADA: Maria Helena Baena de Moraes Lopes

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9942-043X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-5439
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4976-9817
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-5369
                Article
                00812
                10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0035en
                11415216
                39303703
                e44ddadd-9628-45af-8cf9-8152c5022735

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 January 2024
                : 12 July 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 04, Tables: 04, References: 56
                Categories
                Review

                pregnant women,labor, obstetric,parturition,prisons,mujeres embarazadas,trabajo de parto,parto,prisiones

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content274

                Most referenced authors859