17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Urinary incontinence is a common and predictable consequence among men with localized prostate cancer who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Despite advances in the surgical technique, urinary continence recovery time remains variable. A range of surgical and patient-related risk factors contributing to urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy have been described, including age, BMI, membranous urethral length and urethral sphincter insufficiency. Physical activity interventions incorporating aerobic exercise, resistance training and pelvic floor muscle training programmes can positively influence the return to continence in men after radical prostatectomy. Traditional approaches to improving urinary continence after radical prostatectomy have typically focused on interventions delivered during the postoperative period (rehabilitation). However, the limited efficacy of these postoperative approaches has led to a shift from the traditional reactive model of care to more comprehensive interventions incorporating exercise-based programmes that begin in the preoperative period (prehabilitation) and continue after surgery. Comprehensive prehabilitation interventions include appropriately prescribed aerobic exercise, resistance training and specific pelvic floor muscle instruction and exercise training programmes. Transperineal ultrasonography is a non-invasive and validated method for the visualization of the action of the pelvic floor musculature, providing real-time visual biofeedback to the patient during specific pelvic floor muscle instruction and training. Importantly, the waiting time before surgery can be used for the delivery of comprehensive prehabilitation exercise-based interventions to increase patient preparedness in the lead-up to surgery and optimize continence and health-related quality-of-life outcomes following radical prostatectomy.

          Abstract

          Incontinence is a common complication of radical prostatectomy and can have a considerable effect on quality of life for men who have survived prostate cancer. In the past, management of postoperative incontinence has focused on rehabilitation and postsurgical management, but prehabilitation, in the form of pelvic floor muscle exercises and training, has the potential to improve postprostatectomy continence outcomes, provide patients with agency for their own health and improve quality of life in men who have been treated for prostate cancer.

          Key points

          • The oncological curative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy can be diminished by treatment-related adverse effects that include urinary incontinence, reduced physiological functional capacity and psychosocial well-being.

          • The increasing survival of men following radical prostatectomy has resulted in the development of preoperative interventions that can improve the patients’ preoperative and postoperative experience and optimize health-related quality-of-life outcomes.

          • Preoperative exercise interventions comprising a combination of aerobic exercise, resistance training and specific pelvic floor muscle training programmes are designed to enhance the patients’ physiological functional capacity and mitigate the treatment-related adverse effects of radical prostatectomy including urinary incontinence.

          • Transperineal ultrasonography can provide a non-invasive and validated method to improve the quality and specificity of the delivery of pelvic floor muscle training interventions in men before and after they undergo radical prostatectomy.

          • A structured and coordinated prehabilitation model of care can be initiated by the surgeon and delivered through their multidisciplinary team to extend the surgical care provided to patients and optimize preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references250

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

          This article provides an update on the global cancer burden using the GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Worldwide, an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases (18.1 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and almost 10.0 million cancer deaths (9.9 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) occurred in 2020. Female breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%), followed by lung (11.4%), colorectal (10.0 %), prostate (7.3%), and stomach (5.6%) cancers. Lung cancer remained the leading cause of cancer death, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths (18%), followed by colorectal (9.4%), liver (8.3%), stomach (7.7%), and female breast (6.9%) cancers. Overall incidence was from 2-fold to 3-fold higher in transitioned versus transitioning countries for both sexes, whereas mortality varied <2-fold for men and little for women. Death rates for female breast and cervical cancers, however, were considerably higher in transitioning versus transitioned countries (15.0 vs 12.8 per 100,000 and 12.4 vs 5.2 per 100,000, respectively). The global cancer burden is expected to be 28.4 million cases in 2040, a 47% rise from 2020, with a larger increase in transitioning (64% to 95%) versus transitioned (32% to 56%) countries due to demographic changes, although this may be further exacerbated by increasing risk factors associated with globalization and a growing economy. Efforts to build a sustainable infrastructure for the dissemination of cancer prevention measures and provision of cancer care in transitioning countries is critical for global cancer control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans

            Approximately 80% of US adults and adolescents are insufficiently active. Physical activity fosters normal growth and development and can make people feel, function, and sleep better and reduce risk of many chronic diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Health promotion by social cognitive means.

              This article examines health promotion and disease prevention from the perspective of social cognitive theory. This theory posits a multifaceted causal structure in which self-efficacy beliefs operate together with goals, outcome expectations, and perceived environmental impediments and facilitators in the regulation of human motivation, behavior, and well-being. Belief in one's efficacy to exercise control is a common pathway through which psychosocial influences affect health functioning. This core belief affects each of the basic processes of personal change--whether people even consider changing their health habits, whether they mobilize the motivation and perseverance needed to succeed should they do so, their ability to recover from setbacks and relapses, and how well they maintain the habit changes they have achieved. Human health is a social matter, not just an individual one. A comprehensive approach to health promotion also requires changing the practices of social systems that have widespread effects on human health.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sean.mungovan@crinstitute.com.au
                Journal
                Nat Rev Urol
                Nat Rev Urol
                Nature Reviews. Urology
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1759-4812
                1759-4820
                8 April 2021
                : 1-23
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Westmead Private Physiotherapy Services, Westmead Private Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales Australia
                [2 ]The Clinical Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.1027.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0409 2862, Department of Professions, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, , Swinburne University of Technology, ; Hawthorn, Victoria Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.51462.34, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9952, Urology Service at the Department of Surgery, , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, ; New York, NY USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.51462.34, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9952, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, ; New York, NY USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.8761.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9919 9582, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Urology, , Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, ; Gothenburg, Sweden
                [7 ]GRID grid.420519.b, ISNI 0000 0000 9952 4517, Physical Therapy Program, , University of Jamestown, ; Fargo, ND USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.1004.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2158 5405, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, , Macquarie University, ; Macquarie Park, New South Wales Australia
                [9 ]GRID grid.51462.34, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9952, Department of Radiology, , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, ; New York, NY USA
                [10 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, Specialty of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, , The University of Sydney, ; Sydney, New South Wales Australia
                [11 ]GRID grid.413252.3, ISNI 0000 0001 0180 6477, Department of Urology, , Westmead Hospital, ; Westmead, New South Wales Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9949-2409
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2890-2447
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2041-6199
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-9171
                Article
                445
                10.1038/s41585-021-00445-5
                8030653
                33833445
                e4281c33-cb01-4328-84d9-3c86700a6343
                © Springer Nature Limited 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 25 February 2021
                Categories
                Review Article

                prostate,surgical oncology
                prostate, surgical oncology

                Comments

                Comment on this article