Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Very Short Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients Who Underwent Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insight From the STOPDAPT-2 Trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Safety and efficacy of clopidogrel monotherapy after very short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is uncertain in patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

          Methods:

          We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis based on the complexity of PCI in the STOPDAPT-2 trial (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2), which randomly compared 1-month DAPT followed by clopidogrel monotherapy with 12-month DAPT after cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent implantation. Complex PCI was defined as any of the following: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents, >60 mm total stent lengths, and target of chronic total occlusion. The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular (cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/definite stent thrombosis/stroke) and bleeding (TIMI [Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction] major/minor) end points. The major secondary end points were the cardiovascular and bleeding end points.

          Results:

          Among the 3009 study patients, there were 509 patients (16.9%) with complex PCI (1-month DAPT: N=245, and 12-month DAPT: N=264) and 2500 patients (83.1%) without complex PCI (1-month DAPT: N=1255, and 12-month DAPT: N=1245). There were no significant interactions between the complexity of PCI and the effects of 1-month DAPT versus 12-month DAPT on the primary end point (complex PCI: 1.67% versus 5.32%, hazard ratio, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.10–0.92], P =0.04, and noncomplex PCI: 2.50% versus 3.35%, hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.47–1.20], P =0.23; P interaction =0.14), and on the major secondary cardiovascular end point (complex PCI: 1.67% versus 3.04%, hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.16–1.79], P =0.31, and noncomplex PCI: 2.02% versus 2.39%, hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.50–1.47], P =0.58; P interaction =0.49). The cumulative 1-year incidence of the major secondary bleeding end point was significantly lower in the 1-month DAPT group than in the 12-month DAPT group regardless of the complexity of PCI (complex PCI: 0% versus 2.29%, log-rank P =0.02, and noncomplex PCI: 0.48% versus 1.38%, log-rank P =0.02).

          Conclusions:

          The effects of clopidogrel monotherapy after 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT for the primary and major secondary end points were comparable in complex PCI and noncomplex PCI without significant interactions.

          Registration:

          URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02619760.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions.

              Although most clinical trials of coronary stents have measured nominally identical safety and effectiveness end points, differences in definitions and timing of assessment have created confusion in interpretation. The Academic Research Consortium is an informal collaboration between academic research organizations in the United States and Europe. Two meetings, in Washington, DC, in January 2006 and in Dublin, Ireland, in June 2006, sponsored by the Academic Research Consortium and including representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and all device manufacturers who were working with the Food and Drug Administration on drug-eluting stent clinical trial programs, were focused on consensus end point definitions for drug-eluting stent evaluations. The effort was pursued with the objective to establish consistency among end point definitions and provide consensus recommendations. On the basis of considerations from historical legacy to key pathophysiological mechanisms and relevance to clinical interpretability, criteria for assessment of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis were developed. The broadly based consensus end point definitions in this document may be usefully applied or recognized for regulatory and clinical trial purposes. Although consensus criteria will inevitably include certain arbitrary features, consensus criteria for clinical end points provide consistency across studies that can facilitate the evaluation of safety and effectiveness of these devices.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
                Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                1941-7640
                1941-7632
                May 2021
                May 2021
                : 14
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan (K.Y., H.W., T. Kimura).
                [2 ]Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan (T.M.).
                [3 ]Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyusyu, Japan (T.D., K.A.).
                [4 ]Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan (M. Ohya, K. Kadota).
                [5 ]Department of Cardiology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Izunokuni, Japan (M. Ogita).
                [6 ]Department of Cardiology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Japan (K. Takagi).
                [7 ]Cardiovascular Center, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Japan (H.S.).
                [8 ]Department of Cardiology, Minamino Cardiovascular Hospital, Hachioji, Japan (A.N.).
                [9 ]Department of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan (M.I., M.A.).
                [10 ]Department of Cardiology, Sendai Cardiovascular Center, Japan (S.F.).
                [11 ]Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Japan (M.N.).
                [12 ]Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan (S.Y.).
                [13 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Shimonoseki City Hospital, Japan (T. Kaneko).
                [14 ]Department of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical Center, Japan (Takashi Tamura).
                [15 ]Department of Cardiology, Tenri Hospital, Japan (Toshihiro Tamura).
                [16 ]Department of Cardiology, Chikamori Hospital, Kochi, Japan (K. Kawai).
                [17 ]Division of Cardiology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Japan (K.N.).
                [18 ]Division of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (K. Tanabe).
                [19 ]Department of Cardiology, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Japan (Y.I.).
                [20 ]Hanaoka Seishu Memorial Cardiovascular Clinic, Sapporo, Japan (K.I.H.).
                [21 ]Department of Cardiology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Morioka, Japan (Y.M.).
                [22 ]Department of Cardiology, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (K. Kozuma).
                [23 ]Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Japan (Y.F.).
                [24 ]Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan (Y.N.).
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010384
                34003662
                e4211c1a-024a-4faa-8482-efe7dbec14ea
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content431

                Cited by10

                Most referenced authors945