7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      What is the difference between the first and the second/third wave of Covid-19? – German perspective

      editorial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Now it has been more than 12 months since the first cases of the new Corona virus variant SARS Cov 2 have been detected in China. The first wave of the pandemic hit a lot of countries hard and many patients died. Not enough specialized equipment and limited knowledge of the disease added to the severity of this first phase. We all learned from our mistakes made during this first wave of the pandemic and due to that the confidence to be able to manage the second wave a lot better was high. Nevertheless, much higher infection numbers, more patients in ICUs and in some countries also more deaths were seen during the second wave. In this editorial we will describe the differences between the first and second wave from a European-German perspective and look at the impact it had on different parts of our lives.

          In general, some shortcomings were relatively easy to prevent from happening again. Basic equipment such as face masks, FFP2 masks and disinfectant is not an issue anymore. The respective political systems have solved that problem. Some countries also have learned from the first wave that prevention is the only option to reduce patient numbers hitting the hospitals and especially the ICUs.

          Due to those facts, most of the European countries now thought they could deal with higher infection numbers. This, however, was an erroneous belief. Theoretical constructs such as a “Lockdown light” have failed to prove successful. Finally, only a hard Lockdown can bring down numbers sufficiently.

          In Hospitals, the experience from the first wave helped to treat patients more effectively, leading to an improved infection number/death ratio. However, the political decision to react slow and sometimes only in increments and not with full force led to a huge increase in patient numbers and consecutively soaring numbers of cases needing treatment in hospitals and ICUs. While some countries managed this second wave a lot better than the first, Germany for example did not. Meanwhile more than 20 000 deaths compared to less than 10 000 in the entire first wave is a sure indication and it was certainly not caused by the medical performance in Hospitals being poorer the second time around.

          For Orthopaedic surgeons, the second wave led to the same restrictions as the first one. Again, they became part of the interdisciplinary COVID-19 teams on the wards and again, the numbers of elective surgeries plummeted dramatically. Financial consequences will remain throughout 2021.

          The second wave was a hard test for society, particularly as it hit its peak around Christmas time. Contact restrictions, closed hotels, forbidden fireworks at New Year all that is a challenge in particular for the younger people in the societies. All those restrictions, however, can never be an excuse for people delivering abstruse theories via social media or during demonstrations. Scientists all over the world deliver reliable information, these are the people to trust - they are the only experts. Some of them also successfully developed what we all hoped for – a vaccine. Although vaccination started some days back, it will take at least until autumn 2021 to have our normal lives back. Hopefully we all learned a lesson.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Impact of COVID-19 on Italy: A Lesson for the Future

          Dear Editor, The recent paper of Gudi, et al , 1 has highlighted certain aspects of COVID-19. In particular, the attention for social and economic consequences of this emergency, usually underestimated, has been clearly and widely described. The dramatic increasing number of people with COVID-19 is now dramatically increasing in Italy and, to date, it remains a severe urgent public health emergency. 2 Hospital teams, local and national authorities are constantly working to face the dramatic consequences of COVID-19 outbreak and to fix specific issues about Emergency Department overcrowding, bed resources and available health care professionals, and the need for patient transfer to other specialized facilities. Recent literature, statistical data and rates of the disease morbidity and mortality suggest that the viral spread is still expected to grow and many new cases would occur, possibly in the hundreds of thousands of people; the preparedness of public health systems will be challenged worldwide. 1 As the outbreak of COVID-19 progresses, epidemiological data are needed to guide situational awareness and intervention strategies. Current goals are to ensure that adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) will be available, not only to health personnel but also to the whole population at risk of contagion, to minimize the risk of further infections and deaths; and to understand more clearly how this novel coronavirus can be controlled by drugs and an effective vaccine. However, this is not only a health issue, but it also gives rise to a lot of socio-economic consequences, widely modifying our lifestyles and policy, with long-term consequences; at the end of this period the whole world will probably be very different. 3 The world needs to rethink the social and health funding, and other related policies. 4 In Italy, for example, during the last decade, we lost a large amount of health funding, hospitals, and health professionals to respect the need to control public spending and to meet the EU directives. At this time, this led to a reduction in the number of hospital beds, intensive care units (ICUs), clinical laboratories, and health professionals. Moreover, it would affect doctors and nurses, with the reported dramatic effects on the current possibility of continuing to cure patients in the central and northern regions, 2 and the risk of being able to warrant adequate cures only to a few people in southern regions. Hopefully, the extraordinary economic interventions adopted to support the Italian National Health Service (SSN, Servizio Sanitario Nazionale ) to counteract COVID-19 crisis will have to become largely ordinary after the emergency if a new, future situation of health crisis is to be tackled with greater serenity and appropriate tools. Lessons from ancient history report the importance of reconsidering the whole lifestyle of people after severe crisis, usually related to infectious diseases (ie , plague epidemics, “Spanish” flu pandemics, AIDS, etc ), to create new health models and to implement health-related policies. 5 School system, national and international economy, and personal relationships are currently changing considerably; and any government must consider these in the next future. 1 Conflicts of Interest: None declared. Financial Support: None.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Spanish flu: an interdisciplinary problem

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Emergency medicine physician burnout and wellness in Canada before COVID19: a national survey

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Orthop
                J Orthop
                Journal of Orthopaedics
                Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V.
                0972-978X
                27 January 2021
                27 January 2021
                Affiliations
                [1]Department for Arthroplasty, Sports-Traumatology and General Orthopaedics, Asklepios Orthopaedic Hospital Lindenlohe, Lindenlohe 18, 92421, Schwandorf, Germany
                Article
                S0972-978X(21)00011-8
                10.1016/j.jor.2021.01.011
                7838578
                33519131
                e415a0af-fa5f-481e-80d3-9b7b5d9b33b3
                © 2021 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Editorial

                Comments

                Comment on this article