6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Effects of Spatial Resolution and Resampling on the Classification Accuracy of Wetland Vegetation Species and Ground Objects: A Study Based on High Spatial Resolution UAV Images

      , , , , , ,
      Drones
      MDPI AG

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          When employing remote sensing images, it is challenging to classify vegetation species and ground objects due to the abundance of wetland vegetation species and the high fragmentation of ground objects. Remote sensing images are classified primarily according to their spatial resolution, which significantly impacts the classification accuracy of vegetation species and ground objects. However, there are still some areas for improvement in the study of the effects of spatial resolution and resampling on the classification results. The study area in this paper was the core zone of the Huixian Karst National Wetland Park in Guilin, Guangxi, China. The aerial images (Am) with different spatial resolutions were obtained by utilizing the UAV platform, and resampled images (An) with different spatial resolutions were obtained by utilizing the pixel aggregation method. In order to evaluate the impact of spatial resolutions and resampling on the classification accuracy, the Am and the An were utilized for the classification of vegetation species and ground objects based on the geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) method in addition to various machine learning classifiers. The results showed that: (1) In multi-scale images, both the optimal scale parameter (SP) and the processing time decreased as the spatial resolution diminished in the multi-resolution segmentation process. At the same spatial resolution, the SP of the An was greater than that of the Am. (2) In the case of the Am and the An, the appropriate feature variables were different, and the spectral and texture features in the An were more significant than those in the Am. (3) The classification results of various classifiers in the case of the Am and the An exhibited similar trends for spatial resolutions ranging from 1.2 to 5.9 cm, where the overall classification accuracy increased and then decreased in accordance with the decrease in spatial resolution. Moreover, the classification accuracy of the Am was higher than that of the An. (4) When vegetation species and ground objects were classified at different spatial scales, the classification accuracy differed between the Am and the An.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Drones
                Drones
                MDPI AG
                2504-446X
                January 2023
                January 15 2023
                : 7
                : 1
                : 61
                Article
                10.3390/drones7010061
                e3af4bd9-28e5-4087-ba9a-8d9b648debbc
                © 2023

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article