34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The association between disrespect and abuse of women during childbirth and postpartum depression: Findings from the 2015 Pelotas birth cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • 18% of the women experienced at least one mistreatment type during childbirth.

          • Verbal abuse increased the likelihood of having postpartum depression.

          • The effect of verbal abuse was greater among women without antenatal depression.

          • Physical abuse increased the odds of having moderate/severe postpartum depression.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study examined the association between disrespect and abuse of women during facility-based childbirth and postpartum depression (PD) occurrence.

          Methods

          We used data from the 2015 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort, a population-based cohort of all live births in the city. We assessed 3065 mothers at pregnancy and 3-months after birth. Self-reported disrespect and abuse experiences included physical abuse, verbal abuse, denial of care, and undesired procedures. We estimate the occurrence of each disrespect and abuse type, one or more types and disrespect and abuse score. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used to assess PD. EPDS scores ≥13 and ≥15 indicated at least moderate PD and marked/severe. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by logistic regression.

          Results

          The prevalence of at least moderate PD and marked/severe PD was 9.4% and 5.7%, respectively. 18% of the women experienced at least one type of disrespect and abuse. Verbal abuse increased the odds of having at least moderate PD (OR = 1.58; 95%CI 1.06–2.33) and marked/severe PD (OR = 1.69; 95%CI 1.06–2.70) and the effect among women who did not experience antenatal depressive symptoms was greater in comparison to those who did (OR = 2.51; 95%CI 1.26–5.04 and OR = 4.27; 95%CI 1.80–10.12). Physical abuse increased the odds of having marked/severe PD (OR = 2.28; 95%CI 1.26–4.12). Having experienced three or more mistreatment types increased the odds of at least moderate PD (OR = 2.90; 95%CI 1.30 - 35.74) and marked/severe PD (OR=3.86; 95%CI 1.58–9.42).

          Limitations

          Disrespect and abuse experiences during childbirth were self-reported.

          Conclusions

          Disrespect and abuse during childbirth increased the odds of PD three months after birth. Strategies to promote high quality and respectful maternal health care are needed to prevent mother-child adverse outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review.

          To review the evidence about the prevalence and determinants of non-psychotic common perinatal mental disorders (CPMDs) in World Bank categorized low- and lower-middle-income countries. Major databases were searched systematically for English-language publications on the prevalence of non-psychotic CPMDs and on their risk factors and determinants. All study designs were included. Thirteen papers covering 17 low- and lower-middle-income countries provided findings for pregnant women, and 34, for women who had just given birth. Data on disorders in the antenatal period were available for 9 (8%) countries, and on disorders in the postnatal period, for 17 (15%). Weighted mean prevalence was 15.6% (95% confidence interval, CI: 15.4-15.9) antenatally and 19.8% (19.5-20.0) postnatally. Risk factors were: socioeconomic disadvantage (odds ratio [OR] range: 2.1-13.2); unintended pregnancy (1.6-8.8); being younger (2.1-5.4); being unmarried (3.4-5.8); lacking intimate partner empathy and support (2.0-9.4); having hostile in-laws (2.1-4.4); experiencing intimate partner violence (2.11-6.75); having insufficient emotional and practical support (2.8-6.1); in some settings, giving birth to a female (1.8-2.6), and having a history of mental health problems (5.1-5.6). Protective factors were: having more education (relative risk: 0.5; P = 0.03); having a permanent job (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.4-1.0); being of the ethnic majority (OR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1-0.8) and having a kind, trustworthy intimate partner (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.3-0.9). CPMDs are more prevalent in low- and lower-middle-income countries, particularly among poorer women with gender-based risks or a psychiatric history.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Association of Persistent and Severe Postnatal Depression With Child Outcomes

            Key Points Question What is the association of differing levels of persistence and severity of postnatal depression with long-term child outcomes? Findings This observational study of 9848 women with varying levels of postnatal depression and 8287 children found that, compared with children of women with postnatal depression that did not persist, of either moderate or severe intensity, children of women with persistent and severe depression are at an increased risk for behavioral problems by age 3.5 years as well as lower mathematics grades and depression during adolescence. Furthermore, women with persistent postnatal depression are likely to experience significant depressive symptoms until at least 11 years after childbirth. Meaning Women with persistent and severe postnatal depression should be prioritized for treatment because they are likely to continue to experience high levels of depressive symptoms and because of the high risk of adverse child development.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a sample of mothers from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study

              The aim of this study was to evaluate the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening and diagnosis of postpartum depression. Three months after delivery, EPDS was administered to 378 mothers from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Up to 15 days later, mothers were re-interviewed by mental health care professionals using a semi-structured interview based on ICD-10 (gold standard). We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point, and values were plotted as a receiver operator characteristic curve. The best cutoff point for screening postpartum depression was > 10, with 82.6% (75.3-89.9%) sensitivity and 65.4% (59.8-71.1%) specificity. For screening moderate and severe cases, the best cutoff point was > 11, with 83.8% (73.4-91.3%) sensitivity and 74.7% (69.4-79.5%) specificity. For diagnosis, EPDS was valid only for prevalence of postpartum depression in the 20-25% range, with 60% PPV for the > 13 cutoff point (59.5% sensitivity; 88.4% specificity). The specificities and PPVs for all cutoff points were below those reported by other authors. Small numbers and the calculation of PPV in samples with overrepresentation of cases in the majority of studies appear to account for these differences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Affect Disord
                J Affect Disord
                Journal of Affective Disorders
                Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
                0165-0327
                1573-2517
                01 September 2019
                01 September 2019
                : 256
                : 441-447
                Affiliations
                [a ]Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro, n° 1160, 3° andar, Pelotas CEP 96020-220, Brazil
                [b ]International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil
                [c ]Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Rio Grande, Brazil
                [d ]Centre for Global Child Health, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 555 University Ave, Toronto ON M5G 1×8, Canada
                [e ]Postgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Rua Luiz de Camões, n° 625, Pelotas CEP 96055-630, Brazil
                [f ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Warneford Ln, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. mariliaepi@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S0165-0327(19)30139-9
                10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.016
                6880287
                31252237
                e3a94271-dc5b-46c4-be36-0ad424ed4f10
                © 2019 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 January 2019
                : 23 April 2019
                : 4 June 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                disrespect and abuse,childbirth,postpartum depression,institutional violence,gender violence

                Comments

                Comment on this article