14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluating Prognostic Bias of Critical Illness Severity Scores Based on Age, Sex, and Primary Language in the United States: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVES:

          Although illness severity scoring systems are widely used to support clinical decision-making and assess ICU performance, their potential bias across different age, sex, and primary language groups has not been well-studied.

          DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS:

          We aimed to identify potential bias of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IVa scores via large ICU databases.

          SETTING/PATIENTS:

          This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) and eICU Collaborative Research Database. SOFA and APACHE IVa scores were obtained from ICU admission. Hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Discrimination (area under receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] curve) and calibration (standardized mortality ratio [SMR]) were assessed for all subgroups.

          INTERVENTIONS:

          Not applicable.

          MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

          A total of 196,310 patient encounters were studied. Discrimination for both scores was worse in older patients compared with younger patients and female patients rather than male patients. In MIMIC, discrimination of SOFA in non-English primary language speakers patients was worse than that of English speakers (AUROC 0.726 vs. 0.783, p < 0.0001). Evaluating calibration via SMR showed statistically significant underestimations of mortality when compared with overall cohort in the oldest patients for both SOFA and APACHE IVa, female patients (1.09) for SOFA, and non-English primary language patients (1.38) for SOFA in MIMIC.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          Differences in discrimination and calibration of two scores across varying age, sex, and primary language groups suggest illness severity scores are prone to bias in mortality predictions. Caution must be taken when using them for quality benchmarking and decision-making among diverse real-world populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database

          MIMIC-III (‘Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care’) is a large, single-center database comprising information relating to patients admitted to critical care units at a large tertiary care hospital. Data includes vital signs, medications, laboratory measurements, observations and notes charted by care providers, fluid balance, procedure codes, diagnostic codes, imaging reports, hospital length of stay, survival data, and more. The database supports applications including academic and industrial research, quality improvement initiatives, and higher education coursework.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet

            Circulation, 101(23)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Crit Care Explor
                Crit Care Explor
                CC9
                Critical Care Explorations
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2639-8028
                17 January 2024
                January 2024
                : 6
                : 1
                : e1033
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, The General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
                [2 ] School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
                [3 ] Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
                [4 ] Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
                [5 ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine in Diagnosis and Monitoring Research of Zhejiang Province, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
                [6 ] Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Medical Center, The General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
                [7 ] Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
                Author notes
                For information regarding this article, E-mail: zhangzhengbo@ 123456301hospital.com.cn
                Article
                00010
                10.1097/CCE.0000000000001033
                10796141
                38239408
                e35a3efb-dcbe-4374-816f-090e2c88b984
                Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China, doi 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 62171471
                Award Recipient : Zhengbo Zhang
                Funded by: National Institute of Health
                Award ID: NIBIB R01 EB017205
                Award Recipient : Leo Anthony Celi
                Funded by: National Special Health Science Program
                Award ID: 22BJZ42
                Award Recipient : Zhengbo Zhang
                Categories
                Observational Study
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                bias evaluation,calibration,discrimination,hospital mortality,illness severity scores

                Comments

                Comment on this article