29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sense of Place, Fast and Slow: The Potential Contributions of Affordance Theory to Sense of Place

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over the past 40 years, the sense of place concept has been well-established across a range of applications and settings; however, most theoretical developments have “privileged the slow.” Evidence suggests that place attachments and place meanings are slow to evolve, sometimes not matching material or social reality (lag effects), and also tending to inhibit change. Here, we present some key blind spots in sense of place scholarship and then suggest how a reconsideration of sense of place as “fast” and “slow” could fill them. By this, we mean how direct and immediate perception–action processes presented in affordance theory (resulting in immediately perceived place meanings) can complement slower forms of social construction presented in sense of place scholarship. Key blind spots are that sense of place scholarship: (1) rarely accounts for sensory or immediately perceived meanings; (2) pays little attention to how place meanings are the joint product of attributes of environmental features and the attributes of the individual; and (3) assumes that the relationship between place attachment and behavior is linear and not constituted in dynamic relations among mind, culture, and environment. We show how these blind spots can begin to be addressed by reviewing key insights from affordance theory, and through the presentation of applied examples. We discuss future empirical research directions in terms of: (1) how sense of place is both perceived and socially constructed; (2) whether perceived and socially constructed dimensions of place can relate to one another when perceived meanings become unsituated; and (3) how place attachment may change over different stages of the life course based upon dynamic relationships between processes of perception–action and social construction. We conclude with insights into how processes of perception–action and social construction could be included in the design and management of urban landscapes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references112

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                29 September 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 1674
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , Uppsala, Sweden
                [2] 2Department of Built Environment, Aalto University , Espoo, Finland
                [3] 3Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Marino Bonaiuto, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy

                Reviewed by: Mirilia Bonnes, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy; Patrick Devine-Wright, University of Exeter, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Christopher M. Raymond, christopher.raymond@ 123456slu.se

                This article was submitted to Environmental Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01674
                5627138
                29033871
                e31f3711-c3a0-4b8a-a52f-d2e4efddb385
                Copyright © 2017 Raymond, Kyttä and Stedman.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 02 June 2017
                : 11 September 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 129, Pages: 14, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Conceptual Analysis

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                ecological psychology,place meanings,human–environment relationships,place attachment,embodied cognition,affordances,dual-process models

                Comments

                Comment on this article