0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Metacognition and the effect of incentive motivation in two compulsive disorders: Gambling disorder and obsessive–compulsive disorder

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Compulsivity is a common phenotype among psychiatric disorders, such as obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and gambling disorder (GD). Deficiencies in metacognition, such as the inability to estimate one's performance via confidence judgments could contribute to pathological decision‐making. Earlier research has shown that patients with OCD exhibit underconfidence, while patients with GD exhibit overconfidence. Moreover, it is known that motivational states (e.g. monetary incentives) influence metacognition, with gain (respectively loss) prospects increasing (respectively decreasing) confidence. Here, we reasoned that OCD and GD symptoms might correspond to an exacerbation of this interaction between metacognition and motivation.

          Methods

          We hypothesized GD's overconfidence to be exaggerated during gain prospects, while OCD's underconfidence to be worsened in loss context, which we expected to see represented in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) blood‐oxygen‐level‐dependent activity. We tested those hypotheses in a task‐based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design (27 patients with GD, 28 patients with OCD, 55 controls). The trial is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NL6171).

          Results

          We showed increased confidence for patients with GD versus patients with OCD, which could partly be explained by sex and IQ. Although our primary analyses did not support the hypothesized interaction between incentives and groups, exploratory analyses did show increased confidence in patients with GD specifically in gain context. fMRI analyses confirmed a central role for VMPFC in the processing of confidence and incentives, but no differences between the groups.

          Conclusion

          Patients with OCD and those with GD reside at opposite ends of the confidence spectrum, while no interaction with incentives was found, nor group differences in neuronal processing of confidence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

          Maximum likelihood or restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimates of the parameters in linear mixed-effects models can be determined using the lmer function in the lme4 package for R. As for most model-fitting functions in R, the model is described in an lmer call by a formula, in this case including both fixed- and random-effects terms. The formula and data together determine a numerical representation of the model from which the profiled deviance or the profiled REML criterion can be evaluated as a function of some of the model parameters. The appropriate criterion is optimized, using one of the constrained optimization functions in R, to provide the parameter estimates. We describe the structure of the model, the steps in evaluating the profiled deviance or REML criterion, and the structure of classes or types that represents such a model. Sufficient detail is included to allow specialization of these structures by users who wish to write functions to fit specialized linear mixed models, such as models incorporating pedigrees or smoothing splines, that are not easily expressible in the formula language used by lmer. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1) ISSN:1548-7660
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.

            Despite significant advances in the study of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), important questions remain about the disorder's public health significance, appropriate diagnostic classification, and clinical heterogeneity. These issues were explored using data from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a nationally representative survey of US adults. A subsample of 2073 respondents was assessed for lifetime Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn (DSM-IV) OCD. More than one quarter of respondents reported experiencing obsessions or compulsions at some time in their lives. While conditional probability of OCD was strongly associated with the number of obsessions and compulsions reported, only small proportions of respondents met full DSM-IV criteria for lifetime (2.3%) or 12-month (1.2%) OCD. OCD is associated with substantial comorbidity, not only with anxiety and mood disorders but also with impulse-control and substance use disorders. Severity of OCD, assessed by an adapted version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, is associated with poor insight, high comorbidity, high role impairment, and high probability of seeking treatment. The high prevalence of subthreshold OCD symptoms may help explain past inconsistencies in prevalence estimates across surveys and suggests that the public health burden of OCD may be greater than its low prevalence implies. Evidence of a preponderance of early onset cases in men, high comorbidity with a wide range of disorders, and reliable associations between disorder severity and key outcomes may have implications for how OCD is classified in DSM-V.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging.

              Although cells in many brain regions respond to reward, the cortical-basal ganglia circuit is at the heart of the reward system. The key structures in this network are the anterior cingulate cortex, the orbital prefrontal cortex, the ventral striatum, the ventral pallidum, and the midbrain dopamine neurons. In addition, other structures, including the dorsal prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, and lateral habenular nucleus, and specific brainstem structures such as the pedunculopontine nucleus, and the raphe nucleus, are key components in regulating the reward circuit. Connectivity between these areas forms a complex neural network that mediates different aspects of reward processing. Advances in neuroimaging techniques allow better spatial and temporal resolution. These studies now demonstrate that human functional and structural imaging results map increasingly close to primate anatomy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m.hoven@amsterdamumc.nl
                Journal
                Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
                Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1440-1819
                PCN
                Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
                John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd (Melbourne )
                1323-1316
                1440-1819
                29 June 2022
                September 2022
                : 76
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1111/pcn.v76.9 )
                : 437-449
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Department of Philosophy Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Arkin and Jellinek, Mental Health Care, and Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 4 ] Paris School of Economics Paris France
                [ 5 ] Swiss Center for Affective Science University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
                [ 6 ] Laboratory for Behavioral Neurology and Imaging of Cognition, Department of Fundamental Neurosciences University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Email: m.hoven@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl

                [†]

                Shared last authors

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0900-8565
                Article
                PCN13434
                10.1111/pcn.13434
                9541950
                35674699
                e3164a3b-1467-4d6d-a9fc-ece010e2a3b3
                © 2022 The Authors. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 May 2022
                : 21 March 2022
                : 01 June 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 6, Pages: 13, Words: 10333
                Funding
                Funded by: Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Talent Grant
                Funded by: Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen , doi 10.13039/501100003958;
                Award ID: 451‐15‐015
                Funded by: NWO Veni Fellowship
                Award ID: 916‐18‐119
                Funded by: ERC Starting Grant
                Award ID: ERC‐StG‐948671
                Funded by: Swiss National Fund Ambizione Grant
                Award ID: PZ00P3_174127
                Categories
                Regular Article
                Regular Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.0 mode:remove_FC converted:07.10.2022

                confidence,gambling disorder,metacognition,obsessive–compulsive disorder,vmpfc

                Comments

                Comment on this article