0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Localization shift of a sugar transporter contributes to phloem unloading in sweet watermelons

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nonparametric confidence interval estimators for heritability and expected selection response.

          Statistical methods have not been described for comparing estimates of family-mean heritability (H) or expected selection response (R), nor have consistently valid methods been described for estimating R intervals. Nonparametric methods, e.g., delete-one jackknifing, may be used to estimate variances, intervals, and hypothesis test statistics in estimation problems where parametric methods are unsuitable, nonrobust, or undefinable. Our objective was to evaluate normal-approximation jackknife interval estimators for H and R using Monte Carlo simulation. Simulations were done using normally distributed within-family effects and normally, uniformly, and exponentially distributed between-family effects. Realized coverage probabilities for jackknife interval (2) and parametric interval (5) for H were not significantly different from stated probabilities when between-family effects were normally distributed. Coverages for jackknife intervals (3) and (4) for R were not significantly different from stated coverages when between-family effects were normally distributed. Coverages for interval (3) for R were occasionally significantly less than stated when between-family effects were uniformly or exponentially distributed. Coverages for interval (2) for H were occasionally significantly less than stated when between-family effects were exponentially distributed. Thus, intervals (3) and (4) for R and (2) for H were robust. Means of analysis of variance estimates of R were often significantly less than parametric values when the number of families evaluated was 60 or less. Means of analysis of variance estimates of H were consistently significantly less than parametric values. Means of jackknife estimates of H calculated from log transformed point estimates and R calculated from untransformed or log transformed point estimates were not significantly different from parametric values. Thus, jackknife estimators of H and R were unbiased. Delete-one jackknifing is a robust, versatile, and effective statistical method when applied to estimation problems involving variance functions. Jackknifing is especially valuable in hypothesis test estimation problems where the objective is comparing estimates from different populations.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            New Phytologist
            New Phytol
            Wiley
            0028-646X
            1469-8137
            September 2020
            June 16 2020
            September 2020
            : 227
            : 6
            : 1858-1871
            Affiliations
            [1 ]National Watermelon and Melon Improvement Center Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (North China) Beijing Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Improvement Beijing 100097 China
            [2 ]College of Life Sciences Capital Normal University Beijing 100048 China
            [3 ]Beijing Key Laboratory of Growth and Developmental Regulation for Protected Vegetable Crops MOE Joint International Research Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding China Agricultural University Beijing 100193 China
            [4 ]Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA
            [5 ]US Department of Agriculture‐Agricultural Research Service Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health Ithaca NY14853USA
            Article
            10.1111/nph.16659
            32453446
            e25308d5-f876-428a-909b-f8193dad6884
            © 2020

            http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#am

            http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

            http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

            History

            Comments

            Comment on this article