14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Gram Stain–Guided Initial Antibiotic Therapy on Clinical Response in Patients With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia : The GRACE-VAP Randomized Clinical Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This randomized clinical trial compares the clinical response to Gram stain–guided vs guideline-based antibiotic therapy in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

          Key Points

          Question

          Does Gram stain–guided antibiotic therapy restrict the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotic agents for ventilator-associated pneumonia without detrimental effects on patient outcomes?

          Findings

          In this randomized clinical trial that included 206 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit, the clinical response to Gram stain–guided antibiotic therapy was noninferior to that of guideline-based antibiotic therapy (76.7% vs 71.8%). Gram stain–guided antibiotic therapy reduced the use of antipseudomonal agents and anti–methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents.

          Meaning

          The findings of this trial suggest that Gram staining can be used in the critical care setting to ameliorate the spread of multidrug-resistant pathogens.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Gram staining should provide immediate information for detecting causative pathogens. However, the effect of Gram staining on restricting the initial antibiotic choice has not been investigated in intensive care units (ICUs).

          Objective

          To compare the clinical response to Gram stain–guided restrictive antibiotic therapy vs guideline-based broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This multicenter, open-label, noninferiority randomized clinical trial (Gram Stain-Guided Antibiotics Choice for VAP) was conducted in the ICUs of 12 tertiary referral hospitals in Japan from April 1, 2018, through May 31, 2020. Patients aged 15 years or older with a VAP diagnosis and a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score of 5 or higher were included. The primary analysis was based on the per-protocol analysis population.

          Interventions

          Patients were randomized to Gram stain–guided antibiotic therapy or guideline-based antibiotic therapy (based on the 2016 Infectious Disease Society of America and American Thoracic Society clinical practice guidelines for VAP).

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcome was the clinical response rate; clinical response was defined as completion of antibiotic therapy within 14 days, improvement or lack of progression of baseline radiographic findings, resolution of signs and symptoms of pneumonia, and lack of antibiotic agent readministration, with a noninferiority margin of 20%. Secondary outcomes were the proportions of antipseudomonal agents and anti–methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) agents as initial antibiotic therapies; 28-day mortality, ICU-free days, ventilator-free days; and adverse events.

          Results

          In total, 206 patients (median [IQR] age, 69 [54-78] years; 141 men [68.4%]) were randomized to the Gram stain–guided group (n = 103) or guideline-based group (n = 103). Clinical response occurred in 79 patients (76.7%) in the Gram stain–guided group and 74 patients (71.8%) in the guideline-based group (risk difference, 0.05; 95% CI, –0.07 to 0.17; P < .001 for noninferiority). Reduced use of antipseudomonal agents (30.1%; 95% CI, 21.5%-39.9%; P < .001) and anti-MRSA agents (38.8%; 95% CI, 29.4%-48.9%; P < .001) was observed in the Gram stain–guided group vs guideline-based group. The 28-day cumulative incidence of mortality was 13.6% (n = 14) in the Gram stain–guided group vs 17.5% (n = 18) in the guideline-based group ( P = .39). Escalation of antibiotics according to culture results was performed in 7 patients (6.8%) in the Gram stain–guided group and 1 patient (1.0%) in the guideline-based group ( P = .03). There were no significant differences between the groups in ICU-free days, ventilator-free days, and adverse events.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Results of this trial showed that Gram stain–guided treatment was noninferior to guideline-based treatment and significantly reduced the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients with VAP. Gram staining can potentially ameliorate the multidrug-resistant organisms in the critical care setting.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03506113

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

          (2013)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions.

            The causes of antibiotic resistance are complex and include human behaviour at many levels of society; the consequences affect everybody in the world. Similarities with climate change are evident. Many efforts have been made to describe the many different facets of antibiotic resistance and the interventions needed to meet the challenge. However, coordinated action is largely absent, especially at the political level, both nationally and internationally. Antibiotics paved the way for unprecedented medical and societal developments, and are today indispensible in all health systems. Achievements in modern medicine, such as major surgery, organ transplantation, treatment of preterm babies, and cancer chemotherapy, which we today take for granted, would not be possible without access to effective treatment for bacterial infections. Within just a few years, we might be faced with dire setbacks, medically, socially, and economically, unless real and unprecedented global coordinated actions are immediately taken. Here, we describe the global situation of antibiotic resistance, its major causes and consequences, and identify key areas in which action is urgently needed. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society.

              It is important to realize that guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. IDSA considers adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances.These guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients at risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), including specialists in infectious diseases, pulmonary diseases, critical care, and surgeons, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HAP and VAP are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                8 April 2022
                April 2022
                8 April 2022
                : 5
                : 4
                : e226136
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Sumiyoshi, Osaka, Japan
                [2 ]Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
                [3 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
                [4 ]Education and Training Center for Students and Professionals in Healthcare, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
                [5 ]Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan
                [6 ]Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Moriguchi, Osaka, Japan
                [7 ]Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
                [8 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Ebina General Hospital, Ebina, Kanagawa, Japan
                [9 ]Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Sapporo City General Hospital, Chuoh, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
                [10 ]Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
                [11 ]Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: February 18, 2022.
                Published: April 8, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6136
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Yoshimura J et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Kazuma Yamakawa, MD, PhD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan ( kazuma.yamakawa@ 123456ompu.ac.jp ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Yoshimura and Morimoto had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Yoshimura, Yamakawa, Ohta, Morimoto.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Yoshimura, Yamakawa, Ohta, Morimoto.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Yoshimura, Yamakawa, Ohta, Nakamura, Hashimoto, Kawada, Tskahashi, Yamagiwa, Kodate, Miyamoto, Fujimi.
                Statistical analysis: Yoshimura, Ohta, Morimoto.
                Obtained funding: Yoshimura, Yamakawa.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Yoshimura, Yamakawa, Ohta, Morimoto.
                Supervision: Yamakawa, Morimoto.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Yoshimura reported receiving manuscript fees from Japan Blood Products Organization and lecturer fees from MSD KK. Dr Yamakawa reported receiving grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma and grants from Nihon Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Dr Hashimoto reported receiving lecturer fees from MSD KK, Nihon Pharmamedical, and Asahi Kasei Pharma. Dr Morimoto reported receiving lecturer fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, Kowa, Toray, and Tsumura; manuscript fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Kowa; and advisory board fees from Novartis and Teijin. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was funded by the Public Trust Foundation of Marumo ER Medicine and Research Institute.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 3.
                Additional Contributions: Takahiro Kinoshita, MD, MPH, Philips Research North America, provided guidance and support over the years as a mentor for Dr Yoshimura. Makiko Ohtroii, Ai Sunagawa, Sachiko Kitamura, Kaori Yamamoto, Hirono Saito, and Saeko Nagano, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness, provided data management. Naoki Kanda, MD, Hitachi General Hospital; Takahiro Oishi, MD, Kansai Medical University; Naoya Miura, MD, PhD, Ebina General Hospital; Tsuyoshi Nakashima, MD, and Mami Shibata, MD, Wakayama Medical University; Akinori Osuka, MD, PhD, Chukyo Hospital; Shuhei Yamano, MD, PhD, and Kazunori Yamashita, MD, PhD, Nagasaki University Hospital; Ryota Sakurai, MD, Ayaka Matsuoka, MD, and Kota Shinada, MD, Saga University Hospital; Takayuki Taira, MD, University of the Ryukyus Hospital; Makoto Kobayashi, MD, and Osamu Fujisaki, MD, Tajima Emergency and Critical Care Medical Center, assisted with recruitment. Yuichiro Oba, MD, Osaka General Medical Center; Atsushi Hiraide, MD, PhD, Kyoto Tachibana University; and Hitoshi Yamamura, MD, PhD, Osaka Prefectural Nakakawachi Emergency and Critical Care Center, participated on the safety monitoring board.
                Article
                zoi220194
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6136
                8994124
                35394515
                e1e702db-b626-4fc0-a15c-71a6a49c4504
                Copyright 2022 Yoshimura J et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 23 November 2021
                : 18 February 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Critical Care Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article