10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lumen apposing metal stents for pancreatic fluid collections: Recognition and management of complications

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          For patients recovering from acute pancreatitis, the development of a pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) predicts a more complex course of recovery, and introduces difficult management decisions with regard to when, whether, and how the collection should be drained. Most PFCs resolve spontaneously and drainage is indicated only in pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis when the collections are causing symptoms and/or local complications such as biliary obstruction. Historical approaches to PFC drainage have included surgical (open or laparoscopic cystgastrostomy or pancreatic debridement), and the placement of percutaneous drains. Endoscopic drainage techniques have emerged in the last several years as the preferred approach for most patients, when local expertise is available. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have recently been developed as a tool to facilitate potentially safer and easier endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, and less commonly, for other indications, such as gallbladder drainage. Physicians considering LAMS placement must be aware of the complications most commonly associated with LAMS including bleeding, migration, buried stent, stent occlusion, and perforation. Because of the patient complexity associated with severe pancreatitis, management of pancreatic fluid collections can be a complex and multidisciplinary endeavor. Successful and safe use of LAMS for patients with pancreatic fluid collections requires that the endoscopist have a full understanding of the potential complications of LAMS techniques, including how to recognize and manage expected complications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical evaluation of a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endosonography-guided pancreatic pseudocyst and gallbladder drainage (with videos).

          Tubular plastic and metal stents have inherent shortcomings when used for transenteric drainage of fluid collections. To evaluate a novel lumen-apposing, self-expandable metal stent for EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and the gallbladder. Retrospective case series. Tertiary-care academic medical center. This study involved 15 patients (median age 54 years) with symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts who underwent 12 transgastric and 3 transduodenal pseudocyst drainage procedures. Five patients (median age 69.5 years) with acute cholecystitis underwent 4 cholecystoduodenostomies and 1 cholecystogastostomy. Stent deployment under EUS guidance, passage of an endoscope through the stent lumen for pseudocystoscopy or cholecystoscopy, transenteric endoscopy-guided interventions including biopsy, necrosectomy, and stone removal. Technical and clinical success. All stents were successfully deployed without complication, with a median time to removal of 35 days. All pseudocysts resolved after a single drainage procedure. One stent migrated into the stomach, and the remaining 14 were found to be patent at the time of removal. There was no pseudocyst recurrence during the 11.4-month median follow-up period. One gallbladder stent remains indwelling and fully patent at 12 months. Resolution of acute cholecystitis was observed immediately after stent implantation. No recurrence of symptoms was observed during a median follow-up period of 9 months. Retrospective study, small sample size, lack of control patients. Transenteric drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and the gallbladder by using a novel, lumen-apposing, metal stent was accomplished with high technical and clinical success in this pilot observational study. Further studies are warranted. Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fully covered self-expanding metal stents versus lumen-apposing fully covered self-expanding metal stent versus plastic stents for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: clinical outcomes and success.

            Endoscopic transmural drainage/debridement of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) has been performed using double-pigtail plastic (DP), fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMSs), or the novel lumen-apposing fully covered self-expanding metal stent (LAMS). Our aim was to perform a retrospective cohort study to compare the clinical outcomes and adverse events of EUS-guided drainage/debridement of WON with DP stents, FCSEMSs, and LAMSs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Gastrointest Endosc
                WJGE
                World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1948-5190
                16 September 2017
                16 September 2017
                : 9
                : 9
                : 456-463
                Affiliations
                Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States. mdesimon@ 123456bidmc.harvard.edu
                Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States
                Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States
                Author notes

                Author contributions: DeSimone ML, Asombang AW and Berzin TM contributed equally to this manuscript.

                Correspondence to: Michael L DeSimone, MD, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 1 Deaconess Rd, West Campus, Deaconess Building, Suite 306, Boston, MA 02215, United States. mdesimon@ 123456bidmc.harvard.edu

                Telephone: +1-617-6328273

                Article
                jWJGE.v9.i9.pg456
                10.4253/wjge.v9.i9.456
                5605345
                28979710
                e1b2c7b8-3c6a-492e-8241-b7e817be81f2
                ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 25 February 2017
                : 2 June 2017
                : 21 July 2017
                Categories
                Minireviews

                pancreatic fluid collection,lumen apposing metal stent,endoscopic necrosectomy,cystgastrostomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article