16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genotype by Environment Interaction on Resistance to Cassava Green Mite Associated Traits and Effects on Yield Performance of Cassava Genotypes in Nigeria

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cassava is the main source of carbohydrate for over 70% of the people in Nigeria, the world’s largest producer and consumer of the crop. The yields of cassava are, however, relatively low in Nigeria largely due to pests and disease infections that significantly lead to inconsistencies in productivity of cassava genotypes in various environments. Fifty-eight F 1 hybrid cassava genotypes plus their two parents which served as check varieties were evaluated in three locations for two years (that is six environments). The objectives of the study were to evaluate genotype by environment interactions (GEI) on resistance to cassava green mite [CGM, Mononychellus tanajoa (Bondar)] associated traits and effects on yield performance of cassava genotypes in Nigeria and to identify superior genotypes that exhibit high stability which combine CGM resistance and high fresh root yield with general and specific environmental adaptation using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype stability index (GSI). The combined analysis of variance based on AMMI revealed significant genotype, environment, and genotype by environment interactions (GEI) for all traits. The percentage variation due to environment was higher than the percentage variation due to genotype for cassava green mite severity (CGMS), leaf retention (LR), root dry matter content (RDMC), and fresh root yield (FRY) indicating that environment greatly influenced the expression of these traits. The percentage variation due to GEI accounted for higher percentage variation than that of genotype and environment separately for all traits, indicating the influence of genotype by environment interaction on expression of the traits. These findings reveal that screening/evaluating for these traits needs multi-environment trials. According to GSI ranking, genotypes G31 (IBA131794), G19 (IBA131762), the check variety G52 (TMEB778), and G11 (IBA131748) were identified as the most stable and most resistant to CGM which also combine high FRY and other useful agronomic traits, implying that these traits in cassava can even be incorporated as preferred by farmers. These genotypes can be tested in more environments to determine their adaptability and potential recommendation for release to farmers for growing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cultivar Evaluation and Mega-Environment Investigation Based on the GGE Biplot

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Conventional breeding, marker-assisted selection, genomic selection and inbreeding in clonally propagated crops: a case study for cassava

              Key message Consolidates relevant molecular and phenotypic information on cassava to demonstrate relevance of heterosis, and alternatives to exploit it by integrating different tools. Ideas are useful to other asexually reproduced crops. Abstract Asexually propagated crops offer the advantage that all genetic effects can be exploited in farmers’ production fields. However, non-additive effects complicate selection because, while influencing the performance of the materials under evaluation, they cannot be transmitted efficiently to the following cycle of selection. Cassava can be used as a model crop for asexually propagated crops because of its diploid nature and the absence of (known) incompatibility effects. New technologies such as genomic selection (GS), use of inbred progenitors based on doubled haploids and induction of flowering can be employed for accelerating genetic gains in cassava. Available information suggests that heterosis, non-additive genetic effects and within-family variation are relatively large for complex traits such as fresh root yield, moderate for dry matter or starch content in the roots, and low for defensive traits (pest and disease resistance) and plant architecture. The present article considers the potential impact of different technologies for maximizing gains for key traits in cassava, and highlights the advantages of integrating them. Exploiting heterosis would be optimized through the implementation of reciprocal recurrent selection. The advantages of using inbred progenitors would allow shifting the current cassava phenotypic recurrent selection method into line improvement, which in turn would allow designing outstanding hybrids rather than finding them by trial and error.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                04 September 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 572200
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Biotechnology Programme, National Root Crops Research Institute, NRCRI , Umudike, Nigeria
                [2] 2 West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana , Accra, Ghana
                [3] 3 Department of Crop Science, University of Ghana , Accra, Ghana
                [4] 4 Department of Plant and Environmental Biology, University of Ghana , Accra, Ghana
                [5] 5 Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY, United States
                [6] 6 Cassava Breeding Unit, International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA) , Ibadan, Nigeria
                Author notes

                Edited by: Isabel Diaz, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain

                Reviewed by: Maria Navajas, Institut National de Recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE), France; Miodrag Grbic, University of Western Ontario, Canada

                *Correspondence: Chiedozie Egesi, cne22@ 123456cornell.edu

                This article was submitted to Plant Pathogen Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2020.572200
                7498573
                33013995
                e1a438c9-4fe4-4511-adf8-0b07fc9d8231
                Copyright © 2020 Jiwuba, Danquah, Asante, Blay, Onyeka, Danquah and Egesi

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 June 2020
                : 14 August 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 8, Equations: 5, References: 37, Pages: 13, Words: 10704
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research

                Plant science & Botany
                cassava,cassava green mite (cgm),genotype by environment interactions (gei),additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (ammi),genotype stability index (gsi),f1 hybrid

                Comments

                Comment on this article