11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Root morphophysiology changes during the habitat transition from soil to canopy of the aroid vine Rhodospatha oblongata

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Aims

          The aroid vine Rhodospatha oblongata is characterized by a habitat change from terrestrial to canopy, relying on aerial roots at maturity to obtain water and nutrients from the forest soil. We hypothesize that morphophysiological acclimation occurs in roots as they grow under atmospheric conditions. These changes would guarantee the whole-plant survival of aroid vines in the new and potentially stressful habitat of the canopy.

          Methods

          Terrestrial and aerial roots were compared on a morphophysiological basis. Root anatomy, water balance, water absorption capacity via fluorescent tracer, and photochemical activity via chlorophyll fluorescence were measured.

          Key Results

          While thin fasciculate roots occur on terrestrial crawling individuals, two clearly distinct aerial roots (anchor and feeder) are produced on canopy individuals, which both adhere to the host trunk. The colour of both aerial roots changes during development from red and brownish to striped and green at maturity. Colour changes are induced by the replacement of epidermis, exodermis and outer cortex by an inner layer of lignified cork on the root region exposed to the atmosphere. In the root region that is in contact with the host, covering substitutions do not occur and both exodermis and lignified cork, along with several epidermal hairs, appear. Water retention capacity was higher in green roots than in other root types. Rehydration capacity via water absorption by hairs of aerial roots was confirmed by fluorescence. Chlorophyll fluorescence data indicated low levels of photosynthetic capacity in aerial roots.

          Conclusions

          Plants should evolve strategies to survive stress situations. The transition from soil to canopy imposes abiotic changes and potentially stressful situations on R. oblongata. We conclude that the morphophysiological changes observed represent an important strategy that permits the maintenance of aroid roots and the survival of R. oblongata in the canopy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Spectral Determination of Chlorophylls a and b, as well as Total Carotenoids, Using Various Solvents with Spectrophotometers of Different Resolution

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annals of Botany
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0305-7364
                1095-8290
                February 16 2021
                February 09 2021
                October 10 2020
                February 16 2021
                February 09 2021
                October 10 2020
                : 127
                : 3
                : 347-360
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
                [2 ]Department of Functional Ecology, Institute of Botany CAS, Trebon, Czech Republic
                [3 ]Laboratório de Ecofisiologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Sala A1-118, Bloco A, CCS, Cidade Universitária, 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
                [4 ]Laboratório de Morfologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Sala A1-108, Bloco A, CCS, Cidade Universitária, 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
                [5 ]Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Pacheco Leão 915, Jardim Botânico, 22460-030, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [6 ]Embrapa Solos, Rua Jardim Botânico, 1024, Jardim Botânico, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22460-000, Brazil
                Article
                10.1093/aob/mcaa182
                e180acea-8719-4a4d-b38e-5a74bf77fb35
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article