1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Operationalizing the Use of Biofabricated Tissue Models as Preclinical Screening Platforms for Drug Discovery and Development.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A wide range of complex in vitro models (CIVMs) are being developed for scientific research and preclinical drug efficacy and safety testing. The hope is that these CIVMs will mimic human physiology and pathology and predict clinical responses more accurately than the current cellular models. The integration of these CIVMs into the drug discovery and development pipeline requires rigorous scientific validation, including cellular, morphological, and functional characterization; benchmarking of clinical biomarkers; and operationalization as robust and reproducible screening platforms. It will be critical to establish the degree of physiological complexity that is needed in each CIVM to accurately reproduce native-like homeostasis and disease phenotypes, as well as clinical pharmacological responses. Choosing which CIVM to use at each stage of the drug discovery and development pipeline will be driven by a fit-for-purpose approach, based on the specific disease pathomechanism to model and screening throughput needed. Among the different CIVMs, biofabricated tissue equivalents are emerging as robust and versatile cellular assay platforms. Biofabrication technologies, including bioprinting approaches with hydrogels and biomaterials, have enabled the production of tissues with a range of physiological complexity and controlled spatial arrangements in multiwell plate platforms, which make them amenable for medium-throughput screening. However, operationalization of such 3D biofabricated models using existing automation screening platforms comes with a unique set of challenges. These challenges will be discussed in this perspective, including examples and thoughts coming from a laboratory dedicated to designing and developing assays for automated screening.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          SLAS Discov
          SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D
          SAGE Publications
          2472-5560
          2472-5552
          October 2021
          : 26
          : 9
          Affiliations
          [1 ] 3D Tissue Bioprinting Laboratory (3DTBL), Division of Pre-clinical Innovation (DPI), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), NIH, Rockville, MD, USA.
          [2 ] Biomedical Ultrasonics, Biotherapy and Biopharmaceuticals Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
          Article
          S2472-5552(22)06763-6 NIHMS1831793
          10.1177/24725552211030903
          9527638
          34269079
          e07341ab-14fc-46a1-8cfe-f0f1856f5d8e
          History

          operationalization,physiological relevance,throughput,3D,biofabricated tissues,biological complexity,drug discovery,drug development,domain of validity,disease modeling,bioprinting,clinical predictability,complex in vitro models

          Comments

          Comment on this article